Verena Brandt1,2, U Joseph Schoepf3, Gilberto J Aquino1, Raffi Bekeredjian2, Akos Varga-Szemes1, Tilman Emrich1,4,5, Richard R Bayer1, Florian Schwarz6, Thomas J Kroencke6, Christian Tesche1,7,8, Josua A Decker1,6. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 5 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. 2. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 5 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. schoepf@musc.edu. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany. 5. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany. 6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. 7. Department of Cardiology, Clinic Augustinum Munich, Munich, Germany. 8. Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feasibility and diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to potentially avoid additional pre-TAVR invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe AS (n = 95, 78.6 ± 8.8 years, 53% female) undergoing pre-procedural TAVR-CT followed by ICA with quantitative coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. CCTA datasets were evaluated using CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification. CT-FFR measurements were computed using an on-site machine-learning algorithm. A combined algorithm was developed for decision-making to determine if ICA is needed based on pre-TAVR CCTA: [1] all patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 4 are referred for ICA; [2] patients with CAD-RADS 2 and 3 are evaluated utilizing CT-FFR and sent to ICA if CT-FFR ≤ 0.80; [3] patients with CAD-RADS < 2 or CAD-RADS 2-3 and normal CT-FFR are not referred for ICA. RESULTS: Twelve patients (13%) had significant CAD (≥ 70% stenosis) on ICA and were treated with PCI. Twenty-eight patients (30%) showed CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 and 24 (86%) of those were reported to have a maximum stenosis ≥ 50% during ICA. Using the proposed algorithm, significant CAD could be identified with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 100%, 78%, 40%, and 100%, respectively, potentially decreasing the number of necessary ICAs by 65 (68%). CONCLUSION: Combination of CT-FFR and CAD-RADS is able to identify significant CAD pre-TAVR and bears potential to significantly reduce the number of needed ICAs. KEY POINTS: • Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) using machine learning together with the CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification safely identifies significant coronary artery disease based on quantitative coronary angiography in patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. • The combination of CT-FFR and CAD-RADS enables decision-making and bears the potential to significantly reduce the number of needed invasive coronary angiographies.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feasibility and diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to potentially avoid additional pre-TAVR invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe AS (n = 95, 78.6 ± 8.8 years, 53% female) undergoing pre-procedural TAVR-CT followed by ICA with quantitative coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. CCTA datasets were evaluated using CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification. CT-FFR measurements were computed using an on-site machine-learning algorithm. A combined algorithm was developed for decision-making to determine if ICA is needed based on pre-TAVR CCTA: [1] all patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 4 are referred for ICA; [2] patients with CAD-RADS 2 and 3 are evaluated utilizing CT-FFR and sent to ICA if CT-FFR ≤ 0.80; [3] patients with CAD-RADS < 2 or CAD-RADS 2-3 and normal CT-FFR are not referred for ICA. RESULTS: Twelve patients (13%) had significant CAD (≥ 70% stenosis) on ICA and were treated with PCI. Twenty-eight patients (30%) showed CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 and 24 (86%) of those were reported to have a maximum stenosis ≥ 50% during ICA. Using the proposed algorithm, significant CAD could be identified with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 100%, 78%, 40%, and 100%, respectively, potentially decreasing the number of necessary ICAs by 65 (68%). CONCLUSION: Combination of CT-FFR and CAD-RADS is able to identify significant CAD pre-TAVR and bears potential to significantly reduce the number of needed ICAs. KEY POINTS: • Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) using machine learning together with the CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification safely identifies significant coronary artery disease based on quantitative coronary angiography in patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. • The combination of CT-FFR and CAD-RADS enables decision-making and bears the potential to significantly reduce the number of needed invasive coronary angiographies.
Authors: Philipp Blanke; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Stephan Achenbach; Victoria Delgado; Jörg Hausleiter; Hasan Jilaihawi; Mohamed Marwan; Bjarne L Nørgaard; Niccolo Piazza; Paul Schoenhagen; Jonathon A Leipsic Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-01
Authors: Benjamin J W Chow; Gary Small; Yeung Yam; Li Chen; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Martin Hadamitzky; Jörg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Fay Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; James K Min Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Michael Michail; Abdul-Rahman Ihdayhid; Andrea Comella; Udit Thakur; James D Cameron; Liam M McCormick; Robert P Gooley; Stephen J Nicholls; Anthony Mathur; Alun D Hughes; Brian S Ko; Adam J Brown Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian Tesche; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Taylor M Duguay; Carlo N De Cecco; Moritz H Albrecht; Domenico De Santis; Marcel C Langenbach; Akos Varga-Szemes; Brian E Jacobs; David Jochheim; Moritz Baquet; Richard R Bayer; Sheldon E Litwin; Ellen Hoffmann; Daniel H Steinberg; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Catherine M Otto; Rick A Nishimura; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Federico Gentile; Hani Jneid; Eric V Krieger; Michael Mack; Christopher McLeod; Patrick T O'Gara; Vera H Rigolin; Thoralf M Sundt; Annemarie Thompson; Christopher Toly Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hendrik Wienemann; Marcel C Langenbach; Victor Mauri; Maryam Banazadeh; Konstantin Klein; Christopher Hohmann; Samuel Lee; Isabel Breidert; Alexander Hof; Kaveh Eghbalzadeh; Elmar Kuhn; Marcel Halbach; David Maintz; Stephan Baldus; Alexander Bunck; Matti Adam Journal: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis Date: 2022-04-14