Literature DB >> 3535880

Allosteric regulation of inducer and operator binding to the lactose repressor.

T J Daly, K S Matthews.   

Abstract

The effects of cysteine modification and variations in pH on the equilibrium parameters for inducer and operator binding to the lactose repressor protein were examined. Operator binding affinity was minimally affected by increasing the pH from 7.5 to 9.2, whereas inducer binding was decreased for both the unliganded protein and the repressor-operator complex over the same range. Inducer binding to the repressor became more cooperative at high pH. The midpoint for the change in inducer affinity and cooperativity was pH 8.3; this value correlates well with cysteine ionization. The differential between repressor-operator affinity in the presence and absence of inducer was significantly decreased by modification of the protein with methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS). In contrast to unreacted protein, the inducer binding parameters for MMTS-modified repressor were largely unaffected by pH variation. The free energy for formation of the completely liganded protein was calculated for two pathways; the delta G values for these two independent routes were equivalent only for stoichiometries of four inducers and two operators per repressor molecule. All of the binding data were analyzed quantitatively by using a Monod-Wyman-Changeux two-state model for allosteric regulation. The observed dependences of the isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactoside binding curves on pH, DNA concentration, and MMTS modification were fitted by varying only the equilibrium constant between the two conformational states of the protein. With this analysis, high pH favors the T (high operator/low inducer affinity) state, while modification of cysteine-281 with MMTS elicits a shift into the R (high inducer/low operator affinity) state.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3535880     DOI: 10.1021/bi00367a020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  8 in total

1.  Cooperative activation of a eukaryotic transcription factor: interaction between Cu(I) and yeast ACE1 protein.

Authors:  P Fürst; D Hamer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Thomas Kuhlman; Zhongge Zhang; Milton H Saier; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interaction of Gal repressor with inducer and operator: induction of gal transcription from repressor-bound DNA.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; Y N Zhou; S Roy; S Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Allosteric transition pathways in the lactose repressor protein core domains: asymmetric motions in a homodimer.

Authors:  Terence C Flynn; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Yifei Kong; Christopher Booth; Kathleen S Matthews; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  One is not enough.

Authors:  Robert Daber; Kim Sharp; Mitchell Lewis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  DNA supercoiling changes the spacing requirement of two lac operators for DNA loop formation with lac repressor.

Authors:  H Krämer; M Amouyal; A Nordheim; B Müller-Hill
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Structure-guided approach to site-specific fluorophore labeling of the lac repressor LacI.

Authors:  Kalle Kipper; Nadja Eremina; Emil Marklund; Sumera Tubasum; Guanzhong Mao; Laura Christina Lehmann; Johan Elf; Sebastian Deindl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.