Carla Casulo1, Melissa C Larson2, Julianne J Lunde2, Thomas M Habermann3, Izidore S Lossos4, Yucai Wang3, Loretta J Nastoupil5, Christopher Strouse6, Dai Chihara5, Peter Martin7, Jonathon B Cohen8, Brad S Kahl9, W Richard Burack10, Jean L Koff8, Yong Mun11, Anthony Masaquel11, Mei Wu11, Michael C Wei11, Ashwini Shewade11, Jia Li11, James Cerhan2, Christopher R Flowers5, Brian K Link6, Matthew J Maurer2. 1. Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: carla_casulo@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 9. Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA. 10. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. 11. Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Novel therapies for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma are commonly evaluated in single-arm studies without formal comparison with other treatments or historical controls. Consequently, rigorously defined treatment outcomes informing expectations for novel therapeutic strategies in this population are sparse. To inform outcome expectations, we aimed to describe treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and duration of response in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receiving three or more lines of systemic therapy. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study, we developed a database of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma from eight academic centres in the USA using data collected in the LEO Cohort study (NCT02736357) and the LEO Consortium. For this analysis, eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had non-transformed grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma, and were receiving systemic therapy in the third line or later after previous therapy with an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent. Clinical data and patient outcomes were abstracted from medical records by use of a standard protocol. The index therapy for the primary analysis was defined as the first line of systemic therapy after the patient had received at least two previous systemic therapies that included an alkylating agent and an anti-CD20 therapy. The main endpoints of interest were overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Outcomes were also evaluated in subsets of clinical interest (index therapy characteristics, patient and disease characteristics, treatment history, and best response assessment). FINDINGS: We screened 933 patients with follicular lymphoma, of whom 441 were included and diagnosed between March 6, 2002, and July 20, 2018. Index therapies included immunochemotherapy (n=133), anti-CD20 antibody monotherapy (n=53), lenalidomide with or without anti-CD20 (n=37), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors with or without anti-CD20 (n=25). 57 (13%) of 441 patients received haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and 98 (23%) of 421 patients with complete data received therapy on clinical trials. After a median follow-up of 71 months (IQR 64-79) from index therapy, 5-year overall survival was 75% (95% CI 70-79), median progression-free survival was 17 months (15-19), and the overall response rate was 70% (65-74; 280 of 400 patients evaluable for response). Patients who were refractory to therapy with an alkylating agent had a lower overall response rate (170 [68%] of 251 patients vs 107 [77%] of 139 patients) and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival (72%, 95% CI 66-78 vs 81%, 73-89; hazard ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·04-2·46) than patients who were not refractory to therapy with an alkylating agent. INTERPRETATION: Patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receive heterogeneous treatments in the third-line setting or later. We observed high response rates to contemporary therapies that were of short duration. These data identify unmet needs among patients with follicular lymphoma, especially those who are refractory to alkylating agents, and might provide evidence by which clinical trials evaluating novel treatments could be assessed. FUNDING: Genentech and the National Cancer Institute.
BACKGROUND: Novel therapies for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma are commonly evaluated in single-arm studies without formal comparison with other treatments or historical controls. Consequently, rigorously defined treatment outcomes informing expectations for novel therapeutic strategies in this population are sparse. To inform outcome expectations, we aimed to describe treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and duration of response in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receiving three or more lines of systemic therapy. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study, we developed a database of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma from eight academic centres in the USA using data collected in the LEO Cohort study (NCT02736357) and the LEO Consortium. For this analysis, eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had non-transformed grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma, and were receiving systemic therapy in the third line or later after previous therapy with an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent. Clinical data and patient outcomes were abstracted from medical records by use of a standard protocol. The index therapy for the primary analysis was defined as the first line of systemic therapy after the patient had received at least two previous systemic therapies that included an alkylating agent and an anti-CD20 therapy. The main endpoints of interest were overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Outcomes were also evaluated in subsets of clinical interest (index therapy characteristics, patient and disease characteristics, treatment history, and best response assessment). FINDINGS: We screened 933 patients with follicular lymphoma, of whom 441 were included and diagnosed between March 6, 2002, and July 20, 2018. Index therapies included immunochemotherapy (n=133), anti-CD20 antibody monotherapy (n=53), lenalidomide with or without anti-CD20 (n=37), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors with or without anti-CD20 (n=25). 57 (13%) of 441 patients received haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and 98 (23%) of 421 patients with complete data received therapy on clinical trials. After a median follow-up of 71 months (IQR 64-79) from index therapy, 5-year overall survival was 75% (95% CI 70-79), median progression-free survival was 17 months (15-19), and the overall response rate was 70% (65-74; 280 of 400 patients evaluable for response). Patients who were refractory to therapy with an alkylating agent had a lower overall response rate (170 [68%] of 251 patients vs 107 [77%] of 139 patients) and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival (72%, 95% CI 66-78 vs 81%, 73-89; hazard ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·04-2·46) than patients who were not refractory to therapy with an alkylating agent. INTERPRETATION: Patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receive heterogeneous treatments in the third-line setting or later. We observed high response rates to contemporary therapies that were of short duration. These data identify unmet needs among patients with follicular lymphoma, especially those who are refractory to alkylating agents, and might provide evidence by which clinical trials evaluating novel treatments could be assessed. FUNDING: Genentech and the National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Daryl Tan; Sandra J Horning; Richard T Hoppe; Ronald Levy; Saul A Rosenberg; Bronislava M Sigal; Roger A Warnke; Yasodha Natkunam; Summer S Han; Alan Yuen; Sylvia K Plevritis; Ranjana H Advani Journal: Blood Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ian W Flinn; Carole B Miller; Kirit M Ardeshna; Scott Tetreault; Sarit E Assouline; Jiri Mayer; Michele Merli; Scott D Lunin; Andrew R Pettitt; Zoltan Nagy; Olivier Tournilhac; Karem-Etienne Abou-Nassar; Michael Crump; Eric D Jacobsen; Sven de Vos; Virginia M Kelly; Weiliang Shi; Lori Steelman; NgocDiep Le; David T Weaver; Stephanie Lustgarten; Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Pier Luigi Zinzani Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ruth Pettengell; Norbert Schmitz; Christian Gisselbrecht; Graeme Smith; William N Patton; Bernd Metzner; Dolores Caballero; Herve Tilly; Jan A Walewski; Isabelle Bence-Bruckler; Bik To; Christian H Geisler; Rik Schots; Eva Kimby; Christian J Taverna; Tomás Kozák; Peter Dreger; Ruzena Uddin; Carmen Ruiz de Elvira; Anthony H Goldstone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carla Casulo; Michelle Byrtek; Keith L Dawson; Xiaolei Zhou; Charles M Farber; Christopher R Flowers; John D Hainsworth; Matthew J Maurer; James R Cerhan; Brian K Link; Andrew D Zelenetz; Jonathan W Friedberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brian K Link; Matthew J Maurer; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Stephen M Ansell; William R Macon; Sergei I Syrbu; Susan L Slager; Carrie A Thompson; David J Inwards; Patrick B Johnston; Joseph P Colgan; Thomas E Witzig; Thomas M Habermann; James R Cerhan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Montoto; A López-Guillermo; A Altés; G Perea; A Ferrer; M Camós; L Villela; F Bosch; J Esteve; F Cervantes; J Bladé; B Nomdedeu; E Campo; J Sierra; E Montserrat Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Franck Morschhauser; Nathan H Fowler; Pierre Feugier; Reda Bouabdallah; Hervé Tilly; M Lia Palomba; Christophe Fruchart; Edward N Libby; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Ian W Flinn; Corinne Haioun; Hervé Maisonneuve; Loic Ysebaert; Nancy L Bartlett; Kamal Bouabdallah; Pauline Brice; Vincent Ribrag; Nicolas Daguindau; Steven Le Gouill; Gian M Pica; Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho; Armando López-Guillermo; Jean-François Larouche; Kiyoshi Ando; Maria Gomes da Silva; Marc André; Pierre Zachée; Laurie H Sehn; Kensei Tobinai; Guillaume Cartron; David Liu; Jianming Wang; Luc Xerri; Gilles A Salles Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Connie L Batlevi; Fushen Sha; Anna Alperovich; Ai Ni; Katy Smith; Zhitao Ying; Jacob D Soumerai; Philip C Caron; Lorenzo Falchi; Audrey Hamilton; Paul A Hamlin; Steven M Horwitz; Erel Joffe; Anita Kumar; Matthew J Matasar; Alison J Moskowitz; Craig H Moskowitz; Ariela Noy; Colette Owens; Lia M Palomba; David Straus; Gottfried von Keudell; Andrew D Zelenetz; Venkatraman E Seshan; Anas Younes Journal: Blood Cancer J Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 11.037