After this article [1] was published, concerns were raised about similarities in some of the microscopy images in Figures 1A and 1D.Specifically:In Figure 1A in this article, the 0 RBV (μg/ml), 100 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel appears similar to the 40 RBV (μg/ml), 10 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel; the 10 RBV (μg/ml), 0 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel appears similar to the 20 RBV (μg/ml), 10 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel; and the 20 RBV (μg/ml), 0 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel appears similar to the 20 RBV (μg/ml), 1000 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel.In Figure 1D in this article, the 0 RBV (μg/ml), 100 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel appears similar to the 10 RBV (μg/ml), 10 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel; and the 0 RBV (μg/ml), 250 IFN-α (IU/ml) appears similar to the 20 RBV (μg/ml), 250 IFN-α (IU/ml) panel.Follow-up on these issues is ongoing; in the meantime, the PLOS ONE Editors issue this Expression of Concern.In addition, please note that reference 16 in this article [1] has been retracted [2].
Authors: Sidhartha Hazari; Asha Patil; Virendra Joshi; Deborah E Sullivan; Cesar D Fermin; Robert F Garry; Richard M Elliott; Srikanta Dash Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: Rajesh Panigrahi; Sidhartha Hazari; Sruti Chandra; Partha K Chandra; Sibnarayan Datta; Ramazan Kurt; Craig E Cameron; Zhuhui Huang; Haitao Zhang; Robert F Garry; Luis A Balart; Srikanta Dash Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 3.240