Ebola virus (EBOV) is an aggressive filoviral pathogen that can induce severe hemorrhagic fever in humans with up to 90% fatality rate. To date, there are no clinically effective small-molecule drugs for postexposure therapies to treat filoviral infections. EBOV cellular entry and infection involve uptake via macropinocytosis, navigation through the endocytic pathway, and pH-dependent escape into the cytoplasm. We report the inhibition of EBOV cell entry via selective inhibition of vacuolar (V)-ATPase by a new series of phenol-substituted derivatives of the natural product scaffold diphyllin. In cells challenged with Ebola virus, the diphyllin derivatives inhibit viral entry dependent upon structural variations to low nanomolar potencies. Mechanistically, the diphyllin derivatives had no effect on uptake and colocalization of viral particles with endocytic marker LAMP1 but directly modulated endosomal pH. The most potent effects were reversible exhibiting higher selectivity than bafilomycin or the parent diphyllin. Unlike general lysosomotrophic agents, the diphyllin derivatives showed no major disruptions of endocytic populations or morphology when examined with Rab5 and LAMP1 markers. The dilated vacuole phenotype induced by apilimod treatment or in constitutively active Rab5 mutant Q79L-expressing cells was both blocked and reversed by the diphyllin derivatives. The results are consistent with the action of the diphyllin scaffold as a selective pH-dependent viral entry block in late endosomes. Overall, the compounds show improved selectivity and minimal cytotoxicity relative to classical endosomal acidification blocking agents.
Ebola virus (EBOV) is an aggressive filoviral pathogen that can induce severe hemorrhagic fever in humans with up to 90% fatality rate. To date, there are no clinically effective small-molecule drugs for postexposure therapies to treat filoviral infections. EBOV cellular entry and infection involve uptake via macropinocytosis, navigation through the endocytic pathway, and pH-dependent escape into the cytoplasm. We report the inhibition of EBOV cell entry via selective inhibition of vacuolar (V)-ATPase by a new series of phenol-substituted derivatives of the natural product scaffold diphyllin. In cells challenged with Ebola virus, the diphyllin derivatives inhibit viral entry dependent upon structural variations to low nanomolar potencies. Mechanistically, the diphyllin derivatives had no effect on uptake and colocalization of viral particles with endocytic marker LAMP1 but directly modulated endosomal pH. The most potent effects were reversible exhibiting higher selectivity than bafilomycin or the parent diphyllin. Unlike general lysosomotrophic agents, the diphyllin derivatives showed no major disruptions of endocytic populations or morphology when examined with Rab5 and LAMP1 markers. The dilated vacuole phenotype induced by apilimod treatment or in constitutively active Rab5 mutant Q79L-expressing cells was both blocked and reversed by the diphyllin derivatives. The results are consistent with the action of the diphyllin scaffold as a selective pH-dependent viral entry block in late endosomes. Overall, the compounds show improved selectivity and minimal cytotoxicity relative to classical endosomal acidification blocking agents.
Filoviruses are a diverse family
of lipid enveloped viruses that represent an ongoing concern for human
health. Among the most prevalent is Ebola virus (EBOV), which caught
global attention during a 2014–2016 outbreak with over 28,000
cases recorded in 10 countries and a fatality rate of approximately
40%.[1] Subsequent outbreaks in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo and Guinea have resulted in more than 3000 cases
and a case fatality of 67%. A preventative vaccine (Ervebo) and two
monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics (Inmazed and Ebanga) were recently
FDA approved. Despite early promise, remdesivir proved to provide
little efficacy in the clinic, and there remains no clinically effective
small-molecule therapy.[2]Many viral
pathogens share common steps in viral entry, suggesting
the potential for broad-spectrum therapies. Filoviral pathogens are
negative-stranded RNA viruses that encode only a few enzymes considered
traditional targets for inhibition. Viral entry into cells, where
the virus first binds to cell surface receptors followed by endosomal
trafficking before entering the cell cytoplasm, offers many important
potential host targets. EBOV cell entry involves engagement of the
virus particle with receptors that include TIM-1, which triggers uptake
via macropinocytosis.[3−7] EBOV viral particles use endosomes for delivery to lysosomes during
which a reduction in pH activates cathepsins to cleave the viral glycoprotein
(GP).[8,9] The processed form of GP can interact with
the lysosomal host cell receptor, Niemann Pick C-type 1 (NPC1).[10−13] This binding event, together with other environmental factors, is
necessary for the eventual fusion of viral and vesicular membranes,
releasing the viral contents into the cytoplasm where genome transcription
and replication can initiate and produce new virus progeny.Of interest for clinical translation are broad-spectrum viral entry
inhibitors with known pharmacological mechanisms of action toward
host targets. Agents targeting the required host factor TPC1 based
on analogues of tetrandrine are under investigation, as are specific
agents for the lysosomal NPC1 receptor.[14,15] In the cases
for known inhibitors of lipid kinases such as apilimod (PIKFyve)[16] and R-59-022 (diacyclglycerol kinase),[17] understanding the contributions of on-target
mechanisms for blockage of viral entry could offer approaches to new
antiviral agents.[18,19] Many efforts have pursued drug
repurposing as an approach to EBOV inhibitors, but developing these
agents as antiviral therapies can present challenges for optimization.[20−22] Previous research and screening efforts have identified alternative
classes of inhibitors for EBOV entry.[23−30] To date, the improvement of EBOV inhibitor activities by structural
modifications has been demonstrated only in select cases.[31−33] However, the mechanisms of viral entry blockade by these agents
remain unknown. Many EBOV entry inhibitors like chloroquine share
chemical features associated with nonselective cationic amphiphilic
drugs (CADs).[34] The antiviral drug effects
of these agents are often considered off-target trapping in acidic
vesicles and lysosomes.[35] The mechanisms
by which these effects translate to inhibition of viral entry are
unclear and remain challenging to optimize.V-ATPases mediate
acidification of endocytic vesicles by coupling
ATP hydrolysis to proton pumping. Natural product inhibitors of V-ATPase
like bafilomycin have shown utility as research tools for decades
(Figure ). The results
with natural-product-inspired synthetic macrolide, SaliPhe, demonstrated
the potential utility of a potent V-ATPase inhibitor to block viral
entry.[36−38] Despite being evaluated in disease models, these
agents have been overlooked for clinical development primarily due
to narrow selectivity. Diphyllin, a plant-derived arylnaphthalene
lactone chemotype member, is also a V-ATPase inhibitor. This compound
and its derivatives have shown broad-spectrum and selective antiviral
activity in vitro against dengue,[39,40] HIV,[41] EBOV and Marburg,[42] SARS-CoV-2,[43] influenza,[39,44,45] West Nile, Japanese encephalitis,
and tick-borne encephalitis.[40] A nanoparticle
formulation of diphyllin has shown in vivo antiviral
activity against influenza[45] and coronavirus.[46] In a lethal Zika infection mouse model, the
diphyllin-6-deoxyglucoside derivative showed significant in
vivo antiviral activity.[40]
Figure 1
Natural-product-inspired
V-ATPase inhibitors and/or other viral
entry inhibitors.
Natural-product-inspired
V-ATPase inhibitors and/or other viral
entry inhibitors.In our prior work, we
evaluated diphyllin structural analogues
to define the significance of the lactone ring. These modifications
of the diphyllin core substructure diminished inhibitory potency of
the endosome acidification, V-ATPase turnover, and EBOV cell entry
efficiency. However, diphyllin-ether derivatives showed improved selectivity
suggesting that further chemical development could lead to better
tolerated and broadly acting antiviral treatments.[42] However, there remain large gaps in our understanding of
what features could be exploited to enhance potency and selectivity
while minimizing cytotoxicity. In addition, the underlying cellular
mechanism of viral entry inhibition remains to be fully established.
Here, we evaluate a set of novel diphyllin-ether derivatives to further
refine the structural features that impact endocytic pH, effects on
EBOV trafficking, and improve potency for inhibition of EBOV into
the low nanomolar range while maintaining a wide window of selectivity.
Results
and Discussion
Rationale for Target Compounds
A
minimal survey of
diphyllin scaffold modifications focusing on the lactone ring system
was the subject of a previous publication.[42] The results indicated a loss of activity for ring open variants
of the arylnaphthalene lactone. Extensions of the lactone ring system
as hydrazones restored some biological activity, but this substitution
proved not to be a robust path for further structural modifications
to usefully active compounds. In contrast, the phenol substitution
with simple alkyl ethers including methyl, ethyl, and butyronitrile
provided compounds with improved potency for blocking viral entry
and enhanced V-ATPase inhibitory activity. Interestingly, side chains
bearing the cyclic base groups morpholino or hydroxyethylpiperazine
also provided compounds with improved viral entry inhibition and selectivity
with no observed toxicity in primary human macrophages (PHMs). Overall
potency for both activities ranged from low micromolar to the hundreds
of nanomolar.A series of phenol-substituted ethers covering
a relatively broad range of log P were pursued
to follow up on the prior observations. In particular, the effects
of the morphilino and piperazinyl groups in the side chain suggested
a role for basic nitrogen groups in enhancing the potency of viral
entry inhibition. The synthesis of ethers was established by a prior
procedure using simple alkyl halides for a few extensions presented
in Figure A to reveal
compounds 1.2–1.6 in Table . This minimal set of compounds
flanked the cLog P of diphyllin (3.34) with
three compounds higher (4.06–4.55) and two lower in value (2.60
and 3.14). Alkylation of the phenolic position with bromoacetate followed
by amidation (Figure B) was used to prepare derivatives with a hydrophilic linker in the
side chain. The two-step process provided additional structural modifications
(2.1–2.13) that included alterations
in ionizable basic groups in side chains with lower clog P values covering the range of 2.32–4.24.
Figure 2
Synthetic scheme
for alkyl and amide inhibitors. (A) (i) ClCH2CH2CH2R, K2CO3, dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO), 3–16 h, 100 °C. (B) (ii)
BrCH2COOEt, K2CO3, DMSO, 100 °C,
2 h; (iii) 0.2 M NaOH H2O:IPA (1:4), rt, 16 h; and (iv)
R2NH, triethylamine (TEA), HCTU, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 3 h, MW (irradiation), 100 °C.
Table 1
Evaluation of Diphyllin Analoguesa,b,c
Data from ref (46).
No effect on cell viability observed
at 25 μM.
EBOV = replication
competent Ebola
virus; PHM = primary human macrophage; and CC50 is for
cytotoxicity after 3 day drug treatment. Baf = bafilomycin A1, entry 1.1 = diphyllin, and AO = acridine orange; all data have been
tested in biological triplicates with different batches of compounds.
Synthetic scheme
for alkyl and amide inhibitors. (A) (i) ClCH2CH2CH2R, K2CO3, dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO), 3–16 h, 100 °C. (B) (ii)
BrCH2COOEt, K2CO3, DMSO, 100 °C,
2 h; (iii) 0.2 M NaOH H2O:IPA (1:4), rt, 16 h; and (iv)
R2NH, triethylamine (TEA), HCTU, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 3 h, MW (irradiation), 100 °C.Data from ref (46).No effect on cell viability observed
at 25 μM.EBOV = replication
competent Ebola
virus; PHM = primary human macrophage; and CC50 is for
cytotoxicity after 3 day drug treatment. Baf = bafilomycin A1, entry 1.1 = diphyllin, and AO = acridine orange; all data have been
tested in biological triplicates with different batches of compounds.
Diphyllin and Derivatives
Are Potent V-ATPase Inhibitors
The primary assays for all
compounds followed a parallel experimental
path to qualify the relative activities for: (a) V-ATPase activity
in isolated endosomal vesicles, (b) in intact HEK293 cells, and (c)
inhibition of Ebola virus infection in HeLa cells (Table , Figures S1 and S2) and in HEK293 cells (Table S1). This series of phenol ethers comprising nitrogen-containing groups
of varied pKa and lipophilicity improved
V-ATPase inhibition potency by the isolated vesicle assay. Several
analogues gave activities equivalent to or better than bafilomycin.
In cell-based endosome acidification assays, inhibitor potencies varied
over 1000-fold and were reflected in EBOV infection assays. The most
potent and selective compounds bear a three-carbon aliphatic linker
(1.3–1.6). Surprisingly, the less
lipophilic acetamide linker diminished potency even when nitrogen
heterocycles were similar. For example, the relative differences in
cellular activities for 1.3–1.5 versus 2.1–2.3 indicate significant roles for
spacer chain composition. Adding lipophilic and basic groups in the
acetamide linker (2.4–2.9) further
reduced potency to less than the parent diphyllin (1.1).
Diphyllin and Derivatives Inhibit Early Steps of Virus Infection
A time of addition assay was performed to gain further insight
into the step at which the compounds may affect virus replication
(Figure A). Compounds 1.1 and 1.5 start to show diminished activity
at 6 h and were ineffective at 18 h after virus addition to cells.
This timeframe is consistent with a block at early steps of infection
involving cell attachment through to endosomal escape of virus particles
into the cell cytoplasm. Despite being active when the virus requires
V-ATPase activity to acidify endosomes to promote infection, the trend
in potencies did not correlate with the IC50 values in
the isolated vesicle V-ATPase assay (Pearson correlation r = −0.09, Figure S3). The potential
for compound degradation in the cell culture media was evaluated for
a representative number of the acetamide side chain compounds (Figures S4 and S5) to assess if poor stability
could explain the diminished cellular activities. For the most rapidly
degraded compound 2.3, the lifetime of the parent molecule
would be >70% during the endosome acidification assay time course.
These changes in compound concentrations would not explain the minimal
activities. In addition, cell-based assays for endosome acidification
and the EBOV entry all showed meaningful correlations of the potencies
(Figure S3). While a significant correlation
exists between EBOV entry assays in two cell lines, the margin of
error of the assays conducted using HEK293 cells was larger than that
in HeLa cells. HEK293 cell loss from poor adherence contributes to
reduced overall quality and significance of the pharmacological test
(Table S1). In general, the performance
of compounds in HEK293 cells was less potent (5–10-fold) than
that of seen in HeLa cells. The reason for this difference is unclear
but may relate to the types of V-ATPase being expressed or differences
in endocytic turnover. Despite this difference, the relative potencies
of the analogues were similar to those observed in the HeLa cell entry
data and gave a positive correlation (r = 0.63, P = 0.005).
Figure 3
Time addition measurements of compound action and activity
in primary
human macrophages. (A) Time of addition of compounds indicates mechanism
of action at early steps in virus replication. HeLa cells were pretreated
for 1 h and then infected with wild-type EBOV or treated 2, 6, or
18 post infections. Cells were dosed with 1.5 (0.16 μM), 1.1 (2 μM), or 2 μM hydroxychloroquine. Infection
efficiency was normalized to untreated controls, and one-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significance by P = <0.05 (*) between time points and the untreated controls.
(B) EBOV infection in primary human macrophages. Primary human macrophages
were infected with live GFP-EBOV after pretreatment with compounds
for 1 h. Compounds were not removed before infection. Infected cells
were fixed, stained, and imaged with epifluorescent microscopy, and
infection efficiency was quantified by counting infected cells and
normalizing to the total cell count in CellProfiler software. Prism
8 software was used to generate a graph, fit curves, and calculate
IC50 values.
Time addition measurements of compound action and activity
in primary
human macrophages. (A) Time of addition of compounds indicates mechanism
of action at early steps in virus replication. HeLa cells were pretreated
for 1 h and then infected with wild-type EBOV or treated 2, 6, or
18 post infections. Cells were dosed with 1.5 (0.16 μM), 1.1 (2 μM), or 2 μM hydroxychloroquine. Infection
efficiency was normalized to untreated controls, and one-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significance by P = <0.05 (*) between time points and the untreated controls.
(B) EBOV infection in primary human macrophages. Primary human macrophages
were infected with live GFP-EBOV after pretreatment with compounds
for 1 h. Compounds were not removed before infection. Infected cells
were fixed, stained, and imaged with epifluorescent microscopy, and
infection efficiency was quantified by counting infected cells and
normalizing to the total cell count in CellProfiler software. Prism
8 software was used to generate a graph, fit curves, and calculate
IC50 values.
Diphyllin and Derivatives
Are Active against EBOV Infection
in Primary Human Macrophages
Filoviral infection of macrophages
is considered one of the primary routes of establishing and continuing
disease.[47−49] The promising activity of compounds 1.2–1.6 in HeLa cells prioritized evaluation in
PHMs. Compounds were preincubated for 1 h with PHMs before challenge
with recombinant Ebola virus encoding GFP as a marker of infection
(GFP-EBOV). At 24 h post infection, the number of infected (GFP+) cells was counted with epifluorescence imaging. A dose dependency
was calculated for each compound and normalized to the DMSO vehicle
control (Figure B).
Compounds 1.3–1.6 bear a basic nitrogen
heterocycle in the side chain and exhibited improved potencies and
selectivities with respect to 1.1–1.2. Compound 1.5 (pKa1 8.92,
pKa2 3.79) showed enhanced potency in
blocking acidification of isolated vesicles and live-cell endosomes,
which translated to the viral entry assays following the observed
trend observed previously for 1.3 and 1.4. However, compound 1.6 has a more lipophilic and basic
piperidine group (pKa 9.52) but exhibited
reduced potency and selectivity relative to 1.3–1.5. Regardless, these diphyllin derivatives represent potent EBOV entry
inhibitors with no observed cytotoxicity in PHM.
Diphyllin and
Derivatives Do Not Affect EBOV Association with
Cells
The first step of virus infection is binding to cells,
which for EBOV can occur through several receptor types after which
the virus is taken up through endocytosis. GFP-tagged virus-like particles
(GFP-VLPs) were used to monitor association with HeLa cells. Virus-like
particles, which morphologically resemble the authentic live virus,
are entry-competent but lack the virus genome; thus, they are considered
noninfectious and appropriate for use in a BSL-2 setting. HeLa cells
were pretreated with compound at concentrations near the approximate
IC50 values seen in the acridine orange assay that show
a correlation with the authentic EBOV infection assays. After incubation
with GFP-VLPs, cells were fixed, imaged with epifluorescence microscopy
(Figure A), and counted
particles present inside cells (Figure B). 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl)
amiloride (EIPA) is an inhibitor of macropinocytosis, while NH4Cl alters an endocytic buffering capacity and both serve as
controls.[50] In each case, diphyllin and
its derivatives had minimal to no effect on VLP association and uptake
in most cases. The results do not correlate with the relative potency
of the viral entry inhibition and appear to lack significance.
Figure 4
Effect of diphyllin
and derivatives on VLP cell binding. (A) Representative
images of the Ebola GFP-VLP (green) internalization assay in HeLa
cells pretreated with compounds and stained with a cell mask (yellow
dotted line) 2 h post-VLP addition. Compounds were dosed at the following
concentrations: EIPA at 50 μM, NH4Cl at 100 mM, diphyllin
(1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at 10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at
500 nM, and 2.6 at 250 nM. (B) Quantification of GFP-VLP
internalization into cells using CellProfiler software. Statistics
represent one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to no drug + VLP
control.
Effect of diphyllin
and derivatives on VLP cell binding. (A) Representative
images of the Ebola GFP-VLP (green) internalization assay in HeLa
cells pretreated with compounds and stained with a cell mask (yellow
dotted line) 2 h post-VLP addition. Compounds were dosed at the following
concentrations: EIPA at 50 μM, NH4Cl at 100 mM, diphyllin
(1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at 10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at
500 nM, and 2.6 at 250 nM. (B) Quantification of GFP-VLP
internalization into cells using CellProfiler software. Statistics
represent one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to no drug + VLP
control.
Diphyllin and Derivatives
Show Variable Effects on EBOV-VLP
Trafficking to Lysosomes
Since cell association was not affected,
subsequent steps leading to cell infection were tested. An early step
to EBOV cell entry involves macropinocytosis of the viral particle
followed by trafficking through the endocytic pathway.[3] Many reported viral entry inhibitors are sufficiently lipophilic
agents containing basic nitrogen groups that can accumulate in lysosomes
and disrupt organelle functions.[34,51] Also, NH4Cl is a known pH disruptor of the endosome–lysosome
function while impacting the trafficking of filoviral particles.A colocalization assay of GFP-VLPs with the lysosomal marker LAMP1
was used as an indicator of the successful routing of the particles
through the endocytic pathway. HeLa cells pretreated with diphyllin
derivatives at the same concentrations used in the uptake assay were
exposed to GFP-VLPs. Cells were fixed and stained for LAMP1 before
imaging and quantifying LAMP1 and GFP-VLP colocalization (Figure A,B). EIPA and NH4Cl are known to act at different steps of the uptake and trafficking
process, and both agents exhibited inhibition of GFP-VLP association
with LAMP1+ compartments (EIPA p = 0.0189,
NH4Cl p = 0.0031). Diphyllin 1.1 at 500 nM also showed a significant reduction of GFP-VLPs in LAMP1
vesicles, while the more lipophilic 1.2 showed a reduced
capacity to inhibit the same colocalization. Surprisingly, the most
basic compounds 1.3–1.6 did not inhibit
GFP-VLP colocalization with LAMP1. These results argue against a role
for a nonspecific basic nitrogen effect on lysosomal functions for
compounds 1.3–1.6. In contrast, the
less potent inhibitor 2.6 showed a moderate effect on
GFP-VLP-LAMP1 colocalization perhaps associated with the additional
basic site in the side chain. Despite a range of effects for each
treatment and LAMP1 colocalization, except for diphyllin, there appears
to be little overall correlation between the potency of viral entry
inhibitors and the trafficking of the GFP-VLP to lysosomes.
Figure 5
Impact of diphyllin
and derivatives on VLP trafficking to lysosomal
compartments. (A) Representative images of pretreated HeLa cells infected
with GFP-VLPs (green). Two hour post addition, cells were fixed, stained
for LAMP1 (red), and imaged with epifluorescent imaging. Compounds
were dosed at the following concentrations: NH4Cl at 100
mM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at 10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at 500 nM, and 2.6 at 250 nM. (B) Quantification
of the colocalization between GFP-VLPs and LAMP1+ vesicles. Statistics
represent a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to the no drug
control.
Impact of diphyllin
and derivatives on VLP trafficking to lysosomal
compartments. (A) Representative images of pretreated HeLa cells infected
with GFP-VLPs (green). Two hour post addition, cells were fixed, stained
for LAMP1 (red), and imaged with epifluorescent imaging. Compounds
were dosed at the following concentrations: NH4Cl at 100
mM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at 10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at 500 nM, and 2.6 at 250 nM. (B) Quantification
of the colocalization between GFP-VLPs and LAMP1+ vesicles. Statistics
represent a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to the no drug
control.
Diphyllin and Derivatives
Do Not Morphologically Disrupt the
Endocytic System
The diphyllin derivatives exhibited no observable
effects on the VLP trafficking to LAMP1+ vesicles, likely
lysosomes, while still inhibiting EBOV entry. The results inspired
evaluation of the impacts of these compounds on the morphology and
population of intracellular compartments of the endocytic system.
The first study made use of HEK293 cells expressing a GFP-Rab5 marker
for early endosomes (Figures and S6). Cells were treated with
compounds for 3 h and fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342 before
confocal imaging. Images of at least 10 cells per drug condition in
each biological replicate were collected, and the number of vesicles
in each image was determined.
Figure 6
Effect of diphyllin and derivatives on the morphology
and population
of Rab5+ early endocytic vesicles. (A) Confocal imaging of GFP-Rab5-expressing
HEK293 cells treated with drugs for 3 h and stained with Hoechst 33342
nuclear stain. Compounds were dosed at the following concentrations:
bafilomycin at 10 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at
10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at 500 nM, and 2.6 at 250
nM. (B) Quantification of Rab5+ punctate vesicle diameters. Rab5+
vesicles were binned based on their appearance as either punctate
or dilated structures. Diameters of vesicles were measured with ImageJ
and recorded in Prism 9 software. (C) Quantification of Rab5+ vesicle
population. Using ImageJ software, the number of vesicles (punctate
and dilated) were counted per cell and analyzed by nested one-way
ANOVA with multiple comparisons to DMSO.
Effect of diphyllin and derivatives on the morphology
and population
of Rab5+ early endocytic vesicles. (A) Confocal imaging of GFP-Rab5-expressing
HEK293 cells treated with drugs for 3 h and stained with Hoechst 33342
nuclear stain. Compounds were dosed at the following concentrations:
bafilomycin at 10 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at
10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at 500 nM, and 2.6 at 250
nM. (B) Quantification of Rab5+ punctate vesicle diameters. Rab5+
vesicles were binned based on their appearance as either punctate
or dilated structures. Diameters of vesicles were measured with ImageJ
and recorded in Prism 9 software. (C) Quantification of Rab5+ vesicle
population. Using ImageJ software, the number of vesicles (punctate
and dilated) were counted per cell and analyzed by nested one-way
ANOVA with multiple comparisons to DMSO.Vesicles were binned into two groups: punctate and dilated structures.
The average size of Rab5+ punctate structures in DMSO-treated
cells was found to be 450 nm; this is consistent with prior studies
which estimate the size of a mature endosome at 500 nm.[52] Bafilomycin treatment showed a moderate reduction
in the size of Rab5+ vesicles, with an average of 400 nm.
Like bafilomycin, compound 2.2 also induces a significant
reduction in the size of Rab5+ vesicles to an average of
380 nm. Surprisingly, all of the other diphyllin derivatives tested,
including 1.1–1.5, 2.1, 2.3, and 2.6, showed minimal to no effect
on the sizes of Rab5+ vesicles, with averages between 410
and 460 nm.The second study used mCherry-LAMP-1 as a marker
for endolysosomes
in HEK293 cells (Figure ). This experiment also used the known PIKfyve inhibitor apilimod,
previously shown to block EBOV viral entry, as a positive control.[53] Apilimod-treated cells were the only case with
any significantly altered LAMP1+ structures compared to
the DMSO vehicle. Dilated LAMP1+ structures became distinct
as enlarged and coalescing compartments.[54] However, the punctate structures were not significantly affected.
In all other compound treatments, perturbation of the LAMP1+ puncta and dilated vesicle structures was not observed.
Figure 7
Effect of diphyllin
and derivatives on the morphology and population
of LAMP1+ lysosomal vesicles. (A) Confocal imaging of mCherry-LAMP1-expressing
HEK293 cells treated with drugs for 3 h and stained with Hoechst 33342
nuclear stain. Compounds were dosed at the following concentrations:
bafilomycin at 10 nM, apilimod at 200 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at 10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at 500 nM, and 2.6 at 250 nM. (B) Quantification of LAMP1+ lysosome size.
LAMP1+ vesicles were binned based on their appearance as either punctate
or dilated structures. Diameters of vesicles were measured with ImageJ
and recorded in Prism 9 software. (C) Quantification of LAMP1+ vesicle
population. Using ImageJ software, the number of vesicles (punctate
and dilated) was counted per cell. Statistics reflect a one-way nested
ANOVA run with multiple comparisons to DMSO.
Effect of diphyllin
and derivatives on the morphology and population
of LAMP1+ lysosomal vesicles. (A) Confocal imaging of mCherry-LAMP1-expressing
HEK293 cells treated with drugs for 3 h and stained with Hoechst 33342
nuclear stain. Compounds were dosed at the following concentrations:
bafilomycin at 10 nM, apilimod at 200 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.3 at 100 nM, 1.5 at 10 nM, 2.1 at 250 nM, 2.2–2.3 at 100 nM, 2.4 at 500 nM, and 2.6 at 250 nM. (B) Quantification of LAMP1+ lysosome size.
LAMP1+ vesicles were binned based on their appearance as either punctate
or dilated structures. Diameters of vesicles were measured with ImageJ
and recorded in Prism 9 software. (C) Quantification of LAMP1+ vesicle
population. Using ImageJ software, the number of vesicles (punctate
and dilated) was counted per cell. Statistics reflect a one-way nested
ANOVA run with multiple comparisons to DMSO.
Diphyllin and Derivatives Can Block and Reverse Apilimod-Induced
Lysosomal Coalescence
Bafilomycin has been shown to reverse
the endolysosome dilation induced by the drug apilimod.[55] If V-ATPase inhibition is a mechanism for this
reversal, the diphyllin derivatives would be expected to have an impact
on the dilated compartments. The first study was designed to test
the ability of diphyllin derivatives to block the formation of apilimod-induced
large compartments in HEK293 cells expressing mCherry-LAMP1. Following
inhibitor pretreatments, the cells were challenged with apilimod,
stained with nuclear stain, and imaged by confocal microscopy (Figure A). The numbers of
large (>1 μm) dilated vesicles per cell were determined (Figure C).
Figure 8
Blockage and reversal
of apilimod-induced LAMP1 lysosomal coalescence
phenotype by diphyllin and derivatives. (A) Representative images
of mCherry-LAMP1-expressing HEK293 cells treated with 500 nM diphyllin
and 100 nM derivatives (1.2–1.5)
for 1 h followed by a 1 h 200 nM apilimod treatment. (B) Representative
images of mCherry-LAMP1-expressing cells treated with apilimod for
1 h followed by a 1 h treatment with diphyllin and derivatives. (C)
Quantification of the number of dilated mCherry+ vesicles >1 μM
in size when mCherry-LAMP1-expressing HEK293 cells were treated with
diphyllin and derivatives for 1 h followed by a 1 h apilimod treatment.
(D) Quantification of the number of dilated mCherry+ vesicles >1
μM
in size when mCherry-LAMP1-expressing HEK293 cells were treated with
apilimod for 1 h followed by a 1 h treatment with diphyllin and derivatives.
Statistics represent a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to
DMSO.
Blockage and reversal
of apilimod-induced LAMP1 lysosomal coalescence
phenotype by diphyllin and derivatives. (A) Representative images
of mCherry-LAMP1-expressing HEK293 cells treated with 500 nM diphyllin
and 100 nM derivatives (1.2–1.5)
for 1 h followed by a 1 h 200 nM apilimod treatment. (B) Representative
images of mCherry-LAMP1-expressing cells treated with apilimod for
1 h followed by a 1 h treatment with diphyllin and derivatives. (C)
Quantification of the number of dilated mCherry+ vesicles >1 μM
in size when mCherry-LAMP1-expressing HEK293 cells were treated with
diphyllin and derivatives for 1 h followed by a 1 h apilimod treatment.
(D) Quantification of the number of dilated mCherry+ vesicles >1
μM
in size when mCherry-LAMP1-expressing HEK293 cells were treated with
apilimod for 1 h followed by a 1 h treatment with diphyllin and derivatives.
Statistics represent a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to
DMSO.In cells pretreated with DMSO,
there was an average of 8 dilated
vesicles >1 μm per cell. The average dropped to nearly 1
in
cells pretreated with bafilomycin, which is known to block apilimod’s
lysosomal phenotype. Similarly, treatment with diphyllin derivatives
significantly decreased the number of large, dilated vesicles in apilimod-treated
cells.The second study assessed the ability of diphyllin derivatives
to reverse an established apilimod-induced phenotype. Apilimod pretreated
cells were challenged with the DMSO vehicle, bafilomycin, or diphyllin
derivatives. Cells were stained and imaged with confocal microscopy
following the second treatment (Figure B,D). In apilimod-treated cells with DMSO controls,
there was an average of eight large, dilated vesicles per cell. This
average significantly dropped to nearly 1 in cells treated with bafilomycin.
Similarly, diphyllin and derivatives significantly decreased the number
of large, dilated vesicles in apilimod-treated cells.Finally,
a third study was performed to evaluate whether diphyllin
derivatives could reverse the phenotype of the constitutively active
(CA) Rab5 mutant Q79L. This mutation causes enlarged dilated Rab5+ compartments that phenocopy the effects of apilimod on endolysosomes.
A prior report connecting the Q79L mutation and bafilomycin-induced
effects on vacuolation of early endosomes implicates a role for V-ATPase.[56] The diphyllin derivatives were used to test
whether V-ATPase inhibition impacts the dilated phenotype. HEK293
cells expressing GFP-Rab5 CA Q79L were used to test this hypothesis
(Figure S7A). The number of large (>1
μm)
dilated vesicles were counted (Figure S7B). Strikingly, V-ATPase inhibitors did abrogate the Rab5 CA Q79L
phenotype: DMSO-treated cells had an average of three enlarged vesicles.
In contrast, bafilomycin had an average of 1.3, diphyllin (1.1) an average of 1.5, and for compounds 1.3–1.5, there was a range of averages from 0.9 to 1.2.
Diphyllin
and Derivatives Have a Reversible Effect on the pH
of Endocytic Vesicles
While diphyllin and derivatives were
all able to prevent the pH-dependent accumulation of acridine orange
in endosomes, the dynamics of the effects are not clear. Since diphyllin
was found to be significantly less toxic to cells than bafilomycin,
the potential for reversible effects on endosome pH was assessed using
the same acridine orange assay. The reversibility assay was performed
by treating cells with compounds for 3 h, before removal by washing,
and loading with acridine orange to determine the immediate response.
The second set of cells were put into Opti-MEM serum-free media for
24 h before loading with acridine orange and evaluating the response
post washout. Acridine orange is a dichromatic cell-permeable fluorescent
dye that makes a metachromatic shift from green to red when trapped
in acidic vesicular organelles like endosomes and lysosomes. In these
acidic compartments, acridine orange is protonated and no longer permeable
to cellular membranes.When normalized with the DMSO-treated
cells, the % response can be interpreted as the percent of endogenous
vesicular acidification activity. There was no significant difference
between the vesicular acidification activity in cells before and 24
h post washout for the DMSO control treatment. However, the inhibition
of vesicular acidification was reversible to differing degrees with
bafilomycin, diphyllin, and derivatives (Figure A). Bafilomycin shows the highest percent
inhibition, but the full recovery of acridine orange pH-dependent
shift to red was not observed. In contrast, diphyllin-treated cells
(1.1) returned from an initial response of 57.5 ±
9.0% acidification activity to 90.2 ± 11.5% activity after the
24 h washout period. Likewise, the effects of compounds bearing a
nitrogen heterocycle including 1.3–1.5, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, and 2.7 were all reversible and, in many cases, exceeded diphyllin
(Figures A and S8). Interestingly, recovery of vesicular acidification
activity from derivatives 2.1 (95.3%) and 2.3 (97.0%) was not complete. Finally, cells treated with compound 1.2 bearing a simple alkyl side chain showed a contrasting
weak recovery in acidification activity that was not statistically
significant (p 0.0764).
Figure 9
Reversibility of diphyllin
and derivatives on endocytic pH. (A)
HEK293 cells were treated with compounds for 3 h. Bafilomycin was
dosed at 10 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.4 at 100 nM, and 1.5 at 10 nM.
Subsequently, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and
either loaded with acridine orange and read for the immediate post
washout response or incubated in Opti-MEM media for an additional
24 h before loading and reading the 24 h post washout response. (B)
Diphyllin and derivatives tested on the dual uptake assay. HEK293
cells pretreated with compounds for 1 h were loaded with a pH-sensitive
probe (pHRodo Green Dextran 10 kDa) and a pH-insensitive probe (TMR-Dextran
10 kDa). Bafilomycin was dosed at 10 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, NH4Cl at 40 mM, and all diphyllin analogues
(1.2–1.5) at 100 nM. Twenty minutes
after loading with the dyes, cells were stained with nuclear stain
and imaged with live-cell confocal microscopy. CellProfiler software
was used to identify stained vesicular structures and calculate the
ratio of fluorescence intensities of the pH-sensitive dye to pH-insensitive
dye. Structures were binned into small and large bins based on their
size. Statistics represent a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons
to the DMSO control for each bin.
Reversibility of diphyllin
and derivatives on endocytic pH. (A)
HEK293 cells were treated with compounds for 3 h. Bafilomycin was
dosed at 10 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, 1.2–1.4 at 100 nM, and 1.5 at 10 nM.
Subsequently, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and
either loaded with acridine orange and read for the immediate post
washout response or incubated in Opti-MEM media for an additional
24 h before loading and reading the 24 h post washout response. (B)
Diphyllin and derivatives tested on the dual uptake assay. HEK293
cells pretreated with compounds for 1 h were loaded with a pH-sensitive
probe (pHRodo Green Dextran 10 kDa) and a pH-insensitive probe (TMR-Dextran
10 kDa). Bafilomycin was dosed at 10 nM, diphyllin (1.1) at 500 nM, NH4Cl at 40 mM, and all diphyllin analogues
(1.2–1.5) at 100 nM. Twenty minutes
after loading with the dyes, cells were stained with nuclear stain
and imaged with live-cell confocal microscopy. CellProfiler software
was used to identify stained vesicular structures and calculate the
ratio of fluorescence intensities of the pH-sensitive dye to pH-insensitive
dye. Structures were binned into small and large bins based on their
size. Statistics represent a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons
to the DMSO control for each bin.However, there is the potential for unknown assay interferences
by the diphyllin derivatives despite the nonoverlapping excitation
and emission spectral properties. The pH-dependent endocytic effects
observed in HEK293 cells were evaluated using a second assay to assess
the subcellular compartment pH effects of diphyllin and derivatives
using the dual dextran uptake assay. The pH-sensitive dye, pHrodo,
was used to assess the pH of dextran-loaded endocytic vesicles; the
pH-insensitive dye, TMR, was used to assess proper dextran uptake
into the endocytic system. The effects measured on the pH-sensitive
dye (pHrodo) can be normalized to those measured on the pH-insensitive
dye (TMR) to account for changes in dextran loading after compound
treatments. Cells were pretreated with compounds for 1 h before loading
with 0.1 mg/mL pHrodo-dextran 10 kDa and 1 mg/mL TMR-dextran 10 kDa.
Cell images were split into the red (TMR) and green (pHrodo) channels
with background subtracted. The ratio of green to red intensities
was calculated for each object before binning based on size: objects ≥
1 μm in diameter and <1 μm in diameter (Figure B). Diphyllin derivatives significantly
(p < 0.0001) decrease the amount of pHrodo fluorescence
in small (<1 μm) TMR-loaded vesicles consistent with an increase
of pH. The characteristics of the larger (>1 μm) vesicle
populations
were not clear. However, the apparent pH of these compartments was
overall more alkaline and far less sensitive to the effects of NH4Cl. A significant decrease (p < 0.0001)
in the large vesicle pHrodo fluorescence was only observed with bafilomycin
and 1.4-treated cells.
Structural Features Modulate
Cellular Selectivity of the Diphyllin
Scaffold Distinct from Bafilomycin
These results implicate
the diphyllin scaffold as a core pharmacophore and highlight a critical
role of the ether linkage to nitrogen substitutions in cellular targeting
to establish potency and selectivity. Natural derivatives of diphyllin
are known that have methyl or glycosyl linkages to the phenol group.[57] An example is a 6-deoxyglucosyl-diphyllin derivative,
which showed in vivo efficacy in a Zika infection
model.[40] However, adding glycosyl groups
can enhance activities associated with cytotoxic effects.[58] The case of compounds 1.3–1.6 highlights a different substitution type using nitrogen-containing
heterocycles that affect greater potency as inhibitors of EBOV cell
entry over the parent diphyllin. These groups appear to provide >100-fold
selective compounds improving viability as host targeted antiviral
agents. Even in the analogues where the viral entry inhibition potency
is reduced, there remains a high degree of selectivity. Interestingly,
the inhibitor potencies using isolated vesicle V-ATPase do not all
correlate well with cellular activities. The physicochemical properties
of the nitrogen heterocycle in localizing the diphyllin core to the
vesicle compartments containing V-ATPase maybe a key feature to enhance
potency. A related study revealed a similar property-based morpholino
group linked through a phenol ether that targets the V0 domain of
V-ATPase.[59] Potential for further optimization
will need to find a balance that ensures cellular localization with
the target.
Effects of Diphyllin Derivatives Are Distinct
The lack
of impact of the diphyllin derivatives on vesicle trafficking is consistent
with the results of VLPs reaching the endolysomes in the presence
of the compounds. These results alone do not explain the mechanism
of viral entry inhibition. The potency of viral entry inhibition appears
related to pH effects on smaller vesicle compartments in the endosome–lysosome
pathway. A reasonable hypothesis would be that the pH-dependent viral-membrane
fusion step, such as the EBOV GP’s cathepsin processing, is
impacted. Further studies will be needed to address this potential
mechanism of action.It does appear that the potency of viral
entry inhibition correlates with the degree of intracellular vesicle
neutralization. These effects are fully reversible with diphyllin
and derivatives distinct from bafilomycin, where cells never fully
recovered vesicle acidification. Since the two compounds are in very
different structural classes, the degree of compound distribution
in cellular compartments is likely distinct. The extent to which the
reversibility contributes to the reduced cellular toxicity of the
diphyllin derivatives relative to bafilomycin is not clear. Another
emerging explanation for classifying the particular cellular effects
for bafilomycin and diphyllin could be their respective binding in
different V-ATPase subunits. The results of these inhibitors on pH
in small vesicle compartments are well supported by the data reported
here. There were no significant morphological changes to intracellular
features observed at the doses of diphyllin derivatives used for these
studies consistent with enhanced selectivity of these agents. These
results reduce the possibilities that these agents are nonspecific
lysosomotropic agents at the doses used to block viral entry. The
diphyllin side chains’ structural dependence for potency also
distinguishes them from the less potent, nontargeted, broad spectrum
antiviral effects elicited by amodiaquine, mefloquine, azithromycin,
and related classes of drugs.[21] Importantly,
the lack of structural correlations with the basicity or lipophilicity
of this series also argues against some type of unrelated lysosomal
effects on viral entry. Finally, the fact that the on-target potency
does not correlate with the viral entry inhibition implies that the
intracellular localization of these agents may be a significant feature
for improvement.
Methods
Plasmid Constructs
The mCherry-Lysosomes-20 plasmid
(i.e., LAMP1, Addgene #55073) was a gift from Michael Davidson. The
GFP-Rab5B plasmid (Addgene plasmid # 61802) was a gift from Gia Voeltz.[60] The GFP-Rab5 CAQ79L plasmid (Addgene plasmid
# 35140) was a gift from Sergio Grinstein.[61]
Cells
HEK293 cells (ATCC CRL-1573) were maintained
in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Fisher
Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (R&D
Systems, Minneapolis, MN) (referred to here as complete medium). Caco-2
cells (ATCC HTB-37) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS,
1× penicillin/streptomycin, 1× nonessential amino acids,
and 2 mM l-glutamine in T-75 flasks at 37 °C in 5% CO2 and 90% relative humidity. Cells were grown for at least
2 weeks after removing from cryopreservation before studies were conducted.
Inhibition of Cellular Vesicle Acidification
HEK293
cells were seeded into clear 96-well plates (Falcon) at 10,000 cells/well
and allowed to grow for 18–20 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in complete medium. Cells were treated with inhibitors at
varying concentrations (<2% DMSO) for 4 h before the addition of
1 μg/mL acridine orange in DMEM for 10 min before media was
removed and cells washed twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS). Fluorescent readings were taken with a Biotek Synergy 4 microplate
reader using the following filter pairings: 485/20–530/30 and
485/20–665/7 nm. Data shown are the 665/530 nm emission ratio
for 12 individual experiments. IC50 data are reported as
the concentration at which 50% of the 665/530 nm ratio was inhibited
relative to the vehicle-treated control with the standard deviation.
All compounds were also assayed without the acridine orange dye to
determine if background fluorescence was interfering with the assay.
This background fluorescence was determined by washing cells with
1× PBS twice and reading in both fluorescence wavelengths and
subtracted from the total fluorescence in both channels before determining
the fluorescent ratio after dye treatment.
Determination of Cytotoxicity
HEK293 cells were seeded
into clear 96-well plates (Falcon) at 10,000 cells/well and allowed
to grow for 18–20 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in
complete medium until they reached ∼80% confluency. Cells were
then treated with inhibitors at varying concentrations (<2%DMSO)
for 72 h. Then, 0.5 mg/ml MTT was added to cells for 4 h before quenching
the reaction with acidic isopropanol (10% Triton, 0.1 M HCl). After
incubation for 24 h at room temperature, the absorbance at 570 and
650 nm was measured using a Biotek Synergy 4 microplate reader. The
absorbance at 650 nm was subtracted from the 570 nm to normalize data
to any residual media fluorescence. Data are shown as mean ±
standard error of the mean of the normalized 570 nm absorbance. CC50 data are reported as the concentration at which cell viability
was 50% relative to the controls with the standard deviation for 12
individual experiments.
HEK293 Vesicle Isolation
The isolation
and assays were
performed similarly to that previously described.[62,63] In brief, cells were grown to confluency with complete medium in
a 175 cm2 flask (Corning) before growth media was removed
and replaced with serum-free DMEM for 2 h. To neutralize endosomes
prior to lysis, FCCP was added to the cellular media to reach a final
concentration of 1 μM. Cells were incubated with FCCP for 15
min before cells were scrapped from the plate and pelleted at 1000g for 5 min. The media was discarded and cells were resuspended
in HEK assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, 50 mM sucrose, 50
mM KCl, 90 mM potassium gluconate, 1 mM EGTA, Pierce protease inhibitor
mini tablet, pH = 7.4) and were then lysed by passage through a 22
gauge needle 10–15 times. Lysates were then centrifuged at
10,000g for 30 s with a Beckman Coulter Microfuge
22R centrifuge. The supernatant was removed and centrifuged at 14,500g for 20 min. The remaining supernatant was discarded, and
the pellet was resuspended in HEK assay buffer.
Inhibition
of Acridine Orange Quenching Assay
The vesicle
mixture was resuspended in HEK assay buffer + 1% bovine serum albumin
(BSA) + 6 μM acridine orange and split into fractions with the
protein concentration being 100 μg/mL and transferred to a clear
96-well plate. The isolated vesicles were pretreated with inhibitors
for 1 h at 37 °C. Fluorescent readings were taken with a Biotek
Synergy 4 microplate reader with the 485/20 nm excitation filter and
the 530/30 nm emission filter. Plates were read at 1 min intervals
for 2 min to measure baseline fluorescence before 5 mM ATP and 5 mM
MgCl2 were added to initiate V-ATPase activity. Readings
were taken at 1 min intervals for 1 h before the addition of 1 μg/mL
nigericin (Tocris) and further reading for 15 min at 1 min intervals.
The change in fluorescence between the 1 h time point after ATP addition
and the reading 2 min after nigericin was added were used to quantify
the activity of V-ATPase in each sample. Data are shown as mean ±
standard deviation of nine individual experiments for each compound
and concentration.
Stability in Cell Media Assessment
Compounds were suspended
in DMEM + 10% FBS at 100 mM concentration, and aliquots were removed
at 0, 4, 24, 48 h while incubating at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Sample media was diluted 1/10 in acetonitrile + 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid and cooled to 4 °C for 30 min. Samples were then centrifuged
at 14,000g, and the supernatant was removed and analyzed
by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Phenomenex
Kromasil C18 HPLC column. The percentage of the original sample peak
was used to determine the amount of compound remaining at each time
point in comparison with phenol standard. Data shown are the mean
± standard error of the mean for five individual experiments.
Stability in HEK293 Cells
HEK293 cells were seeded
into Corning 6-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well in DMEM+10% FBS and incubated overnight at 37 °C
with 5% CO2. The media was then removed and replaced with
DMEM+10% FBS containing 100 mM select inhibitors and allowed to incubate
for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Media was then collected
and cells were washed three times with cold PBS before being allowed
to dry for 15 min. A 1:1:0.0005 mixture of acetonitrile:methanol:trifluoroacetic
acid was then added to each well and incubated at 4 °C for 16
h. The supernatant was then removed and centrifuged at 14,000g for 10 min to remove cellular debris. The new supernatant
was then concentrated to 500 μL and analyzed by HPLC using Phenomenex
Kromasil C18 HPLC column. Data shown are the average of three independent
experiments.
GFP-EBOV Virus Infection Assay
Replication
competent
Zaire Ebola virus (EBOV) Mayinga strain with insertion of GFP between
the nucleoprotein (NP) and VP35, which was a kind gift from Heinz
Feldmann (NIH, Rocky Mountain Laboratory, Hamilton, MT), was produced
in Vero cells. All work was performed in a biosafety level 4 (BSL-4,
protection level 4) laboratory at Boston University.[64] The virus stock was titered on cells used in assays (HeLa,
HEK293 cells) using a focus assay and counting colonies of GFP-expressing
cells. For evaluation of small-molecule impact on infection, cells
were challenged with a virus dose corresponding to an MOI of 0.1–0.2.
Twenty-four hour post infection, cells were fixed with formalin and
washed three times with PBS. Nuclei were then stained with Hoeschst
33342 stain (1:10,000 final dilution), and cells were imaged using
a Nikon Ti-eclipse microscope and analyzed with CellProfiler. Typically,
5–10,000 cells were evaluated for infection, which at an MOI
of 0.2 corresponded over 2000 infected cells for untreated cells.
PHMs were similarly treated with compounds at varying concentrations
(<1% DMSO) for 1 h and then were infected with GFP-EBOV. IC50 data are reported at the concentration at which 50% of the
viral infection was inhibited in comparison to the controls, with
the standard deviation for four individual experiments.[42,64]
Timed Addition Assay
To gauge when treatments were
active against virus replication, compounds were added at times after
virus addition. HeLa cells were challenged with wild-type EBOV at
an MOI of 0.2 and then treated with either diphyllin, 1.5, or hydroxychloroquine either 1 h prior to infection and then at
2, 6, or 18 h post infection. All groups, including untreated controls,
were incubated for 48 h before the supernatant was collected for quantitative
real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis to measure
virus yield, and monolayers were fixed in 10% formalin for staining
of viral glycoprotein (GP) as a measure of virus replication. Since
wild-type virus was used, replication was measured by GP levels in
cells. For staining of viral GP, plates were removed from formalin
and washed three times with PBS. Staining of EBOV GP was done using
a primary antibody (Mouse Anti-EBOV, 4F3, IBT Bioservices, Cat. #0201-020)
followed by a secondary Alexa 546-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody
(Thermo, Cat. #A-21123). Nuclei were stained using Hoechst 33342 (1:10,000
final dilution). Plates were imaged on a Cytation automated imager,
and infection and nuclei counts were measured using Cell Profiler
software. For qRT-PCR, virus particles in culture supernatants were
lysed in 0.1% Triton X-100 detergent containing buffer supplemented
with RNase inhibitor as described elsewhere.[65] qPCR was conducted according to the NEB Luna Universal qRT-PCR kit
(Cat. # E3006L) using CDC-developed primer sets purchased from IDT.
GraphPad Prism was used for graphical and statistical analysis.
Production of EBOV GFP-VLPs
EBOV VLPs were produced
as previously described.[64] Briefly, VLPs
were produced by calcium phosphate cotransfection of four plasmids
encoding Ebola proteins VP40, NP, GP, and GFP-VP40 into HEK293FT cells.
VLPs were harvested from cell culture media 48 h after transfection.
Cultured media was clarified by centrifugation at 1800g for 15 min. The clarified media was overlaid on a 20 mM HEPES buffered
20% (w/v) sucrose cushion and concentrated by ultracentrifugation
at 141,118g for 2 h. VLPs were resuspended in Dulbecco’s
PBS, stored in small aliquots and frozen in liquid nitrogen prior
to storage at −80 °C. VLPs were thawed only once, immediately
prior to use.
GFP-VLP Uptake and Trafficking Assays
HeLa cells were
seeded into eight well Ibidi slides (cat. no. 80826; Ibidi, Madison,
WI) at a concentration of 20,000 cells per well and incubated overnight
prior to VLP entry studies. Compounds tested were diluted into DMEM
media containing 2% fetal bovine serum (<0.15% DMSO). Cells were
treated with the compound of interest for 1 h prior to removal of
used media and replenishing with 200 μL of fresh media containing
10 μL of VLP suspension and the same concentration of test compound.
Cells were incubated for 2 h prior to quickly rinsing three times
with 200 μL of cold Dulbecco’s PBS. Each well was filled
with 200 μL of cold PBS buffered 10% formalin and stored at
4 °C overnight until imaged on the epifluorescent microscope.
As a control, 100 mM NH4Cl (cat. no. A661, Fisher, Grand
Island, NY) was included.
Immunofluorescence Staining and Image Analysis
Wells
were washed three times in Dulbecco’s PBS and permeabilized
for 10 min with 0.1% Triton X-100 (cat. no. 9002-93-1, Fisher, Grand
Island, NY). Samples were blocked for 30 min at room temperature with
5% v/v goat serum (cat. no. ICN19135680, Life Technologies, Carlsbad,
CA) in Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS). Primary anti-LAMP1 antibody (cat
no. ab24170, Abcam) and Alexa-546 conjugated goat anti-Rabbit secondary
antibody (ThermoFisher, A11035) were used to visualize LAMP1. Cell
Mask Blue (ThermoFisher, cat no. H32720) was used at a 1:10,000 dilution
in DPBS to visualize the cell body. Fluorescence images of three channels,
green (GFP, 488 nm), orange (Alexa 546, 546 nm), and UV (Cell Mask,
350 nm) were used to visualize VLPs and cells. Ten fields of view
were used to capture immunofluorescence image stacks for each sample
using a Nikon Ti-Eclipse microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY). Z-stack images were converted to maximum intensity projections
(MIPs) and split into their corresponding channels using Fiji ImageJ.
Colocalization was quantified using the overlapping object tool on
CellProfiler. Graphpad Prism was used for ANOVA analyses.
Endosome and
Lysosome Morphology and Population Assays
HEK293 cells were
seeded in 35 mm glass-bottom dishes (Fisher Scientific)
for a confluency of approximately 70% at the time of transfection.
For early endosome morphology and population experiments, a transfection
mixture of 1 μg of GFP-Rab5 (Addgene # 61802), 7.5 μL
of Mirus transfection reagent TransIT LT1, and 250 μL of Opti-MEM
was used. For lysosome morphology and population experiments, a transfection
mixture of 750 ng of mCherry-Lysosomes-20 (Addgene plasmid #55073),
7.5 μL of Mirus transfection reagent TransIT LT1, and 100 μL
of Opti-MEM was used. The morning following the transfection, cells
were switched into DMEM+10% FBS and drugged accordingly with a final
DMSO concentration of 0.15%. Drugs were incubated with cells for 3
h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain diluted
in PBS was added to cells for a final concentration of 1:10,000 and
incubated for the final 20 min of drug treatment. After treatment,
cells were fixed in 1 mL 4% PFA for 10 min at room temperature followed
by washing with ice-cold PBS. Fixed samples were stored in PBS at
4 °C until imaging. Three biological replicates were performed
on different days.
Analysis of Endosome and Lysosome Morphology
Images
were collected as described in the confocal imaging Methods section. To analyze the morphology of endocytic vesicles,
Rab5+ or LAMP1+ vesicle sizes (diameters) were
measured using the straight edge line tool in FIJI. For each experiment,
vesicles were binned into two bins: punctate vesicular structures
or dilated (defined by a dark hole visible in the center) vesicular
structures. Diameters were recorded in Prism 8 software. Data points
collected in a nested column data table were cleaned by identifying
outliers using the ROUT method, performing the calculation for each
subcolumn separately with a Q = 0.1% (removes definitive
outliers). Data for both punctate and swollen dilated vesicular structures
were analyzed using a nested one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons
to the DMSO control.
Analysis of Endosome and Lysosome Populations
Images
were collected as described in the confocal imaging Methods section. ImageJ software was used to threshold, remove
noise, and count the number of particles in the image with an area
>0.05 μm2. For both Rab5 and LAMP1 vesicles, data
points collected in a column data table were cleaned by identifying
outliers using the ROUT method, performing the calculation with a Q = 1%. A nested one-way ANOVA was run with Dunnett’s
multiple comparison test.
Dual Dextran Uptake Endolysosomal pH Assay
HEK293 cells
were seeded in four-chamber 35 mm glass-bottom dishes (Cellvis) for
70% confluency on the day of the experiment. Drugs were incubated
with cells for 1 h, and then cells were loaded with 0.1 mg/mL pHrodo-dextran
10 kDa (Thermo Scientific) and 1 mg/mL TMR-dextran 10 kDa (ThermoFisher
Scientific) and costained with Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain for 20
min at 37 °C. After dextran loading and staining, cells were
imaged with confocal microscopy. Drug effect on pH was quantified
using the intensity of pHrodo normalized to the intensity of TMR per
vesicle. Data was binned based on vesicle size: either > or <1
μm in diameter. CellProfiler was used to quantify the images.
Prism 8 was used to graph and analyze the data with one-way ANOVA
with multiple comparisons to the DMSO control for each bin.
Reversibility
of V-ATPase Inhibition in Acridine Orange Response
HEK293
cells were seeded into 96-well black, glass-bottom plates,
and drug treatments began when cells were 90% confluent. Drugs were
diluted in DMEM + 10% FBS to be at or near their IC50 with
a final DMSO concentration of 0.15%; 100 μL of drugged media
was placed into the appropriate wells. Cells were incubated with drugs
for 3 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. After treatment, drugged
media was aspirated. Plates used to collect AO response immediately
post washout were washed with Opti-MEM and then incubated with 100
μL 1 μg/mL acridine orange in PBS for 20 min at 37 °C,
5% CO2; subsequently, cells were washed with PBS + 3% FBS
and then had fluorescent readings taken with Molecular Devices SpectraMax
M5e using the following filter pairings: 485/20–530/30 and
485/20–665/7 nm. Plates used to collect washout AO response
were washed thoroughly after drug treatment and incubated in 100 μL/well
of Opti-MEM for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2; at this point,
Opti-MEM was aspirated and the acridine orange assay was run and fluorescence
measured using the same protocol as the immediate post washout plates.
The 665/530 nm emission ratio was calculated for each well and input
into Prism 8. Ratios of treatment wells were normalized to the average
of the technical replicates of DMSO on the same plate, with DMSO as
100% endogenous vesicular acidification activity (equation used: (1
– ((DMSO-Drug)/DMSO)) × 100%. The normalized data were
cleaned using the ROUT method with a Q = 1%. Cleaned
data were compiled into a grouped table that was used to run a two-way
ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test run by comparing
cell means regardless of rows and columns and by comparing each cell
mean with every other cell mean. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnets
multiple comparisons to Diphyllin was run on the cleaned normalized
24 h washout data to determine if the derivatives had significantly
different reversibility.
Reversibility of Rab5 Constitutively Active
Mutant Q79L Phenotype
HEK293 cells were seeded in the wells
of a black, glass-bottom
6-well plate (Cellvis) for a confluency of approximately 70% at the
time of transfection. Using the calcium phosphate transfection methods
provided by Abcam, 1 μg of GFP-Rab5 CA Q79L (Addgene plasmid
# 35140) was transfected into cells overnight. The following morning,
media was changed to fresh DMEM + 10% FBS and drugs were added with
a final DMSO concentration of 0.15%. Drugs were incubated with cells
for 1 h, and then, cells were fixed, stained, and imaged with confocal
microscopy. At least five cells were analyzed per biological replicate.
Three biological replicates were performed. Images were collected
as described in the confocal imaging Methods section and analyzed in ImageJ software. Rab5+ vesicles
were measured and manually counted and were recorded in a column table
in Prism 8 software. A nested one-way ANOVA was run with Dunnett’s
multiple comparison test to determine statistical significance.
Inhibition of Apilimod-Induced Lysosomal Phenotypes
HEK293
cells were seeded in the wells of a black, glass-bottom 6-well
plate (Cellvis) for a confluency of approximately 70% at the time
of transfection. Using the calcium phosphate transfection methods
provided by Abcam, 1 μg of mCherry-Lysosomes-20 (Addgene plasmid
#55073) was transfected into cells overnight. The following morning,
media was changed to fresh DMEM + 10% FBS and drugs were added with
a final DMSO concentration of 0.15%. Drugs were incubated with cells
for 1 h, and then, apilimod was added for a final concentration of
200 nM and incubated for 30 min–1 h. Cells were then fixed,
stained, and imaged with confocal microscopy. At least five cells
were analyzed per biological replicate. Three biological replicates
were performed on different days. Images were collected as described
in the confocal imaging Methods section and
analyzed in ImageJ software. Rab5+ vesicles were measured and manually
counted and were recorded in a column table in Prism 8 software. A
nested one-way ANOVA was run with Dunnett’s multiple comparison
test to determine statistical significance.
Reversibility of Apilimod-Induced
Lysosomal Phenotypes
HEK293 cells were seeded in the wells
of a black, glass-bottom 6-well
plate (Cellvis) for a confluency of approximately 70% at the time
of transfection. Using the calcium phosphate transfection methods
provided by Abcam, 1 μg of mCherry-Lysosomes-20 (Addgene plasmid
#55073) was transfected into cells overnight. The following morning,
media was changed to fresh DMEM + 10% FBS and apilimod was added for
a final concentration of 200 nM and incubated for 1 h. Drugs were
then added with a final DMSO concentration of 0.15% and incubated
for 1 h. Cells were then stained, fixed, and imaged with confocal
microscopy. At least five cells were analyzed per biological replicate.
Three biological replicates were performed on different days. Images
were collected as described in the confocal imaging Methods section and analyzed in ImageJ software. Rab5+ vesicles were measured and manually counted and were recorded
in a column table in Prism 8 software. A nested one-way ANOVA was
run with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine statistical
significance.
Confocal Imaging
All confocal imaging
was done using
the Purdue RHPH Nikon Eclipse Ti A1 instrument using NIS-elements
AR software to capture 1024 × 1024 pixel resolution images at
1/4 frame/second on 60× and 100× oil objectives detecting
the fluorophores with channel series. Nuclear stain in all applicable
experiments was captured using Hoechst 33258 laser presets. GFP-tagged
proteins were captured using the eGFP laser presets in all applicable
experiments. mCherry-tagged proteins were captured using the mCherry
laser presets in all applicable experiments. mCherry-tagged proteins
were captured using the mCherry laser presets in all applicable experiments.
Following imaging, .nd2 files saved from the microscope were opened
in ImageJ and had the background subtracted using a rolling ball radius
of 50.0 pixels and contrast enhanced by <0.3% without normalization
or equalization of the histogram. The 16 bit image was then converted
into RGB color, where it was saved as a tiff with a scale bar.
Authors: Života Selaković; Julie P Tran; Krishna P Kota; Marija Lazić; Cary Retterer; Robert Besch; Rekha G Panchal; Veronica Soloveva; Vantongreen A Sean; Wells B Jay; Aleksandar Pavić; Tatjana Verbić; Branka Vasiljević; Kathleen Kuehl; Allen J Duplantier; Sina Bavari; Rajini Mudhasani; Bogdan A Šolaja Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Emily Happy Miller; Gregor Obernosterer; Matthijs Raaben; Andrew S Herbert; Maika S Deffieu; Anuja Krishnan; Esther Ndungo; Rohini G Sandesara; Jan E Carette; Ana I Kuehne; Gordon Ruthel; Suzanne R Pfeffer; John M Dye; Sean P Whelan; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Kartik Chandran Journal: EMBO J Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Antonia P Gunesch; Francisco J Zapatero-Belinchón; Lukas Pinkert; Eike Steinmann; Michael P Manns; Gisbert Schneider; Thomas Pietschmann; Mark Brönstrup; Thomas von Hahn Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Konstantin H Müller; Denis E Kainov; Karim El Bakkouri; Xavier Saelens; Jef K De Brabander; Christian Kittel; Elisabeth Samm; Claude P Muller Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Han Cheng; Adam Schafer; Veronica Soloveva; Dima Gharaibeh; Tara Kenny; Cary Retterer; Rouzbeh Zamani; Sina Bavari; Norton P Peet; Lijun Rong Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Patrick L Iversen; Christopher D Kane; Xiankun Zeng; Rekha G Panchal; Travis K Warren; Sheli R Radoshitzky; Jens H Kuhn; Rajini R Mudhasani; Christopher L Cooper; Amy C Shurtleff; Farooq Nasar; Melek Me Sunay; Allen J Duplantier; Brett P Eaton; Elizabeth E Zumbrun; Sandra L Bixler; Shannon Martin; J Matthew Meinig; Chih-Yuan Chiang; Mariano Sanchez-Lockhart; Gustavo F Palacios; Jeffrey R Kugelman; Karen A Martins; Margaret L Pitt; Ian Crozier; David L Saunders Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Michela Mazzon; Ana Maria Ortega-Prieto; Douglas Imrie; Christin Luft; Lena Hess; Stephanie Czieso; Joe Grove; Jessica Katy Skelton; Laura Farleigh; Joachim J Bugert; Edward Wright; Nigel Temperton; Richard Angell; Sally Oxenford; Michael Jacobs; Robin Ketteler; Marcus Dorner; Mark Marsh Journal: Viruses Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Qinghua Cui; Han Cheng; Rui Xiong; Gang Zhang; Ruikun Du; Manu Anantpadma; Robert A Davey; Lijun Rong Journal: Viruses Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Tian Liang; Shih-Kai Wang; Charles Smith; Hong Zhang; Yuanyuan Hu; Figen Seymen; Mine Koruyucu; Yelda Kasimoglu; Jung-Wook Kim; Chuhua Zhang; Thomas L Saunders; James P Simmer; Jan C-C Hu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 4.996