Literature DB >> 35356407

Exposure to Bisphenolic Analogues in the Sixth Total Diet Study - China, 2016-2019.

Jing Zhang1, Kai Yao1, Jie Yin1, Bing Lyu1, Yunfeng Zhao2, Jingguang Li2, Bing Shao1, Yongning Wu2.   

Abstract

What is already known about this topic?: Bisphenol A (BPA) and other bisphenolic compounds (BPs) are proved to pose potential endocrine disrupting properties. The primary source of BP exposure is the diet. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) established a temporary tolerable daily intake (t-TDI) of BPA 4 μg/kg body weight per day. What is added by this report?: BPs were detected in composite food samples from the Sixth China Total Diet Study (TDS) at percentages of 27.1%-78.5%. The estimated dietary exposure of BPA and bisphenol S (BPS) for an average adult were 18.1 ng/kg body weight per day and 22.2 ng/kg body weight per day, respectively. The main dietary contributors for BPs were cereals, water and beverage, meat as well as vegetables. What are the implications for public health practices?: BP dietary intake poses low risks on the Chinese general population based on the t-TDI set by EFSA. BPS presented a higher exposure level than BPA, which highlights the need to strengthen the surveillance of BP alternatives in foodstuffs. Copyright and License information: Editorial Office of CCDCW, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisphenol A; Bisphenol S; Dietary exposure

Year:  2022        PMID: 35356407      PMCID: PMC8930410          DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2022.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  China CDC Wkly        ISSN: 2096-7071


Bisphenol A (BPA) is used in the synthesis of commercial plastics, including polycarbonates and epoxy resins, which are incorporated into a wide variety of consumer goods. Exposure to BPA was suspected to result in a variety of toxicities in the neurological, reproductive, metabolic, and immune system (). Considering these potential undesirable effects, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) established a temporary tolerable daily intake (t-TDI) of 4 μg/kg body weight per day (2). Abiding by the regulations on the production and restricted use of BPA in European Union, United States, China, and other countries, BPA in commercial products was gradually replaced by its analogues, such as bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol B (BPB), and bisphenol AF (BPAF). After being put into use, these bisphenolic compounds (BPs) were released into the environment and entered the food chain. A variety of foods (cereals, fruits, meats etc.) were found to contain BPS and other analogues. Studies have shown that the genotoxicity and estrogenic activity of these alternatives are like that of BPA (3-4). The primary source of exposure to BPA for most people is through the diet from contaminated foodstuffs (5). Dietary exposure of BPA from the Canadian Total Diet Study (TDS) was evaluated in view of BPs in composite food samples (6). In China, BPA from the Fourth China TDS (2007) samples as well as BPA and several analogues from the Fifth China TDS (2010–2012) were analyzed and the estimated daily intakes (EDI) of these BPs were safe for general people (7-8). However, in past decades, China’s sustained development and progress have affected the lives of every resident. Under this circumstance, food consumption and contamination levels might have changed remarkably since China’s restriction of BPA in baby products and food contact materials implemented since 2011. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Chinese daily exposure to BPs from the Sixth TDS (2016–2019) (9). Levels of BPs in the Sixth China TDS were provided in Supplementary Tables S1–S4 (available in https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/) and summarized in Table 1, where BPA was detected in 216 out of total 288 samples, with a concentration range of non-detected value (ND) to 20.0 µg/kg, among which the highest level occurred in cereals from Jiangsu Province. The mean concentrations of BPA from food categories ranged from 0.129 µg/kg (milk)–1.02 µg/kg (meat). BPS presented a rate of detection of 78.5%, accounting for 226 samples. The maximum level 67.1 µg/kg was attributed to a sample of meats from Fujian Province. While the second largest value is 16.6 μg/kg from a meat sample in Henan Province. BPF and BPAF were found in 8.33% and 27.1% of samples, with the maximum concentrations of 1.06 μg/kg and 1.75 μg/kg, respectively.
Table 1

Occurrence of BPA and its analogues in different composite Total Diet Study samples.

Category Parameter BPA BPS BPF BPAF
Abbreviations: BPA=bisphenol A; BPS=bisphenol S; BPF=bisphenol F; BPAF=bisphenol AF; LOD=limits of detection; ND=non-detected value.
CerealsMean (μg/kg)0.4660.5450.0070.012
Medium (μg/kg)0.2560.128NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 1.44ND to 6.40ND to 0.169ND to 0.129
Detective rate (%)91.783.34.229.2
Legumes and nutsMean (μg/kg)0.4840.9840.146ND
Medium (μg/kg)0.2550.707NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 3.39ND to 4.23ND to1.06ND
Detective rate (%)87.591.737.50
PotatoesMean (μg/kg)0.3400.1630.0080.006
Medium (μg/kg)0.2710.147NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 1.35ND to 0.648ND to 0.186ND to 0.029
Detective rate (%)95.891.74.229.2
MeatsMean (μg/kg)1.0245.8270.1060.026
Medium (μg/kg)0.4762.010NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 5.82ND to 67.1ND to 0.279ND to 0.530
Detective rate (%)95.891.720.825
EggsMean (μg/kg)0.1800.130ND0.021
Medium (μg/kg)0.1690.042ND0.013
Range (μg/kg)ND to 0.544ND to 0.636NDND to 0.061
Detective rate (%)54.287.5050
Aquatic foodsMean (μg/kg)0.9271.250.0150.125
Medium (μg/kg)0.6890.621ND0.024
Range (μg/kg)0.199 to 3.31ND to 6.34ND to 0.192ND to 1.75
Detective rate (%)10095.88.379.2
MilkMean (μg/kg)0.1290.022ND0.002
Medium (μg/kg)ND0.008NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to <0.385ND to 0.148NDND to 0.026
Detective rate (%)41.729.2012.5
VegetablesMean (μg/kg)0.3470.3430.0150.010
Medium (μg/kg)0.2930.127NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 1.090.020 to 1.81ND to 0.190ND to 0.041
Detective rate (%)95.81008.337.5
FruitsMean (μg/kg)1.680.3150.0320.023
Medium (μg/kg)0.4180.111NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 20.00.026 to 1.71ND to 0.449ND to 0.175
Detective rate (%)91.710012.541.7
SugarMean (μg/kg)0.9090.0340.0110.006
Medium (μg/kg)0.6020.021NDND
Range (μg/kg)0.197 to 3.26ND to 0.114ND to 0.260ND to 0.043
Detective rate (%)91.770.84.220.8
Beverages and waterMean (μg/kg)0.2340.058NDND
Medium (μg/kg)ND0.013NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 1.57ND to 0.612NDND
Detective rate (%)20.850.000
Alcoholic beveragesMean (μg/kg)0.1610.081NDND
Medium (μg/kg)ND0.012NDND
Range (μg/kg)ND to 0.610ND to 1.54NDND
Detective rate (%)37.55000
TotalMean (μg/kg)0.5461.170.0230.019
Medium (μg/kg)0.2510.055NDND
Detective rate (%)75.378.58.3327.1
The EDIs of BPA, BPS, BPF, and BPAF for an average male adult are given in Figure 1. For BPA, the highest exposure was found in Henan (56.9 ng/kg body weight per day), while the lowest was found in Jilin (5.74 ng/kg body weight per day). Mean exposure to BPA was estimated to be 18.1 ng/kg body weight per day, significantly below the t-TDI (4 μg/kg body weight per day) recommended by the EFSA (2). The EDI of BPS in the Sixth TDS for an average Chinese male adult was 22.2 ng/kg body weight per day. Jiangsu (120 ng/kg body weight per day) and Fujian (114 ng/kg body weight per day) posed the two highest exposures in this TDS; while the exposure in Jilin residents (0.559 ng/kg body weight per day) was the lowest. BPF and BPAF presented dietary exposures of 0.485 ng/kg body weight per day and 0.384 ng/kg body weight per day, respectively.
Figure 1

EDI of BPA, BPS, BPF, and BPAF among sampling PLADs from the Sixth TDS.

EDI of BPA, BPS, BPF, and BPAF among sampling PLADs from the Sixth TDS. Abbreviations: BPs=bisphenolic compounds; EDI=estimated daily intakes; BPA=bisphenol A; BPS=bisphenol S; BPF=bisphenol F; BPAF=bisphenol AF; PLADs=provincial-level administrative divisions; TDS=Total Diet Study. The contributions of different food categories to total EDI of BPs are shown in Figure 2. The main dietary contributors for BPA were cereals (40.3%), water and beverage (17.4%) as well as vegetables (13.7%). As for BPS, the dominant contribution food groups were cereals (31.4%), followed by meats (25.4%), legumes (11.7%), vegetables (11.7%) and water and beverages (8.76%). Legumes (41.2%), meats (20.7%), and fruits (11.7%) were the top three contributors of BPF. Exposure to BPAF was mainly from cereals (22.6%), aquatic foods (21.5%) and vegetables (21.2%).
Figure 2

Contribution (% of daily intake) of the food categories to dietary BP intakes for the general Chinese population.

Contribution (% of daily intake) of the food categories to dietary BP intakes for the general Chinese population. Abbreviation: BP=bisphenolic compound; BPA=bisphenol A; BPS=bisphenol S; BPF=bisphenol F; BPAF=bisphenol AF.

DISCUSSION

In the Sixth China TDS, BPS posed a comparable rate of detection as BPA, demonstrating the wide use of BPS. Compared to BPA and BPS, BPF and BPAF appeared to possess evidently lower rates of detection and detection levels. Similar trends were found in the Fifth China TDS (8) and several other reports (10–11). Considering the similar endocrine disrupting properties and other toxicological effects of BPs, the exposure levels of BPA, BPS, BPF, and BPAF were summed up to assess the risks through dietary intake. The combined exposure levels (6.45–139 ng/kg body weight per day, Figure 1) were far below the t-TDI of BPA set by EFSA, which implied that the exposure to BPs for Chinese adults was safe. BPs were concerning in the past three China TDSs ( Supplementary Table S5, available in https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/). The BPA exposures in the Fourth and Fifth TDS were 43.0 ng/kg body weight per day (7 and 217 ng/kg body weight per day (8), respectively. The increase of BPA exposure might be attributed to the feverish growth of China’s BPA consumption from 2000 to 2014. The exposure to BPA in this study was significantly less than that in the Fifth TDS, which may be related to the measures and restrictions of BPA use in China. The exposures to BPS, BPF, and BPAF in the Sixth TDS were also lower than that in the Fifth one. The most remarkable change was that the exposure to BPS exceeded BPA and became the most dominant BP in the Sixth TDS. In Fujian and Jiangsu, the only two provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) where BPs intakes were higher than 100 ng/kg body weight per day, BPS contributed more than 80% of the total BP exposure due to the high levels of BPS in meat from Fujian and cereals from Jiangsu. It is noteworthy that Jilin implemented the “Restriction on Plastic Bags” from January 1, 2015, stipulating that the production and sale of non-degradable plastic shopping bags and plastic tableware were prohibited throughout the province. It has become China’s first PLAD to fully ban “plastics”. The EDIs of BPA and BPS in Jilin in this study were 5.74 ng/kg body weight per day and 0.559 ng/kg body weight per day, respectively, ranking lowest among the 24 PLADs. These values were lower by more than an order of magnitude than the results in the Fifth TDS (300 ng/kg body weight per day for BPA and 11.7 ng/kg body weight per day for BPS, respectively), indicating that the implementation of the restrictions affected the reduction of BPs contaminants. The total dietary exposure to BPA in the Sixth China TDS (18.13 ng/kg body weight per day) was lower than that in France (42.4 ng/kg body weight per day) (12), Canada (52–81 ng/kg body weight per day) (6), the United States (44.6 ng/kg body weight per day) (11), and the EFSA (116–159 ng/kg body weight per day) (2). However, it was higher than that of a recent survey in United States (6.0 ng/kg body weight per day) (13). The diversity in food consumption habits may be a potential reason for the relatively high BPA exposure to these Western countries. This study has several limitations. Only composite samples were analyzed for the dietary intake assessment of population in a given region, which could reveal realistic information by virtue of appropriate selection of the composite sample size and retesting of select individual samples. As for the samples with extremely high levels of contamination, the original individual samples can be assessed instead. The estimated BPs intake was based on a standard Chinese male adult (18–45 years). There was a lack of the dietary exposure data of 0–18 years-old people in this study. Furthermore, young-aged people and pregnant women are prone to be vulnerable to the endocrine disrupting compounds. The chlorinated derivatives of BPA and BPS reported higher estrogenic activity and other potential toxicities. It is necessary to continuously monitor the dietary exposure of the various BPs, including the chlorinated derivatives. This study investigated the contamination of BPs in composite food samples from the Sixth China TDS during 2016–2019. BPA and BPS were detected in more than 75% of the food samples. Dietary intakes of BPs for Chinese adults were below the t-TDI, and the major contribution was from cereals, water and beverages, meat, and vegetables. The exposure of BPS in the Sixth TDS exceeded that of BPA. This implies the need to strengthen the monitoring of BPs in foodstuffs.

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest.
Table S1

Levels of BPA in composites food samples from the Sixth China Total Diet Study (µg/kg).

Food categories HL LN HE BJ JL SX SN HA NX NM QH GS SH FJ JX JS ZJ SD HB SC GX HN GD GZ
Note: ND: non-detected value, assigned 1/2 LOD in calculations. Abbrreviations: HL=Heilongjiang; LN=Liaoning; HE=Hebei; BJ=Beijing; JL=Jilin; SX=Shanxi; SN=Shaanxi; HA=Henan; NX=Ningxia; NM=Inner Mongolia; QH=Qinghai; GS=Gansu; SH=Shanghai; FJ=Fujian; JX=Jiangxi; JS=Jiangsu; ZJ=Zhejiang; SD=Shandong; HB=Hubei; SC=Sichuan; GX=Gugangxi; HN=Hunan; GD=Guangdong; GZ=Guizhou; (the same below).
Cereals0.2561.4450.1561.341NDa0.2030.8740.9750.2950.2970.3620.1690.2740.2360.1670.2730.1620.1840.178ND0.2561.4450.1561.341
LegumesND0.2030.8740.9750.2950.2970.3620.1690.2740.2360.1670.2730.1620.1840.178ND0.207ND3.3890.5081.1660.5630.1850.723
Potatoes0.2930.404ND0.2190.6980.2390.1870.6360.2120.1851.3520.2710.2710.2740.2770.2220.2060.2330.290.2940.2490.4740.2150.393
Meat0.2135.8150.3830.3560.4531.1040.1751.7370.2280.7843.6291.6650.9260.249ND0.9041.0280.1840.2630.4730.8490.4800.3862.209
Eggs0.2070.5440.453NDNDND0.314NDNDNDND0.2460.286ND0.2090.178NDND0.2510.177ND0.2530.1610.218
Aquatic foods0.1993.3100.7700.6290.2682.4080.1991.2990.2750.9422.4860.3260.6240.6890.7240.6461.2231.3360.4860.2980.8440.6390.6890.928
Milk0.1810.2350.199ND0.025NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.153NDNDNDNDNDND0.1680.3850.2150.2360.249
Vegetables0.1530.2010.1670.453ND0.2841.0880.3470.190.4780.2310.2430.190.2960.2850.3030.5750.2910.1930.3260.3110.3360.3870.936
Fruits0.4320.2470.6060.4680.2611.4980.221.0562.6010.383ND1.4280.4050.2600.17620.0010.1540.5450.4810.2457.9330.180.542ND
Sugars1.6480.6542.0340.5200.7800.530ND0.7840.1973.2561.0661.5160.2520.5430.387ND0.6691.5110.3382.6990.8450.5490.3570.538
Water and beveragesND0.168NDNDNDNDND1.5691.534NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.161NDNDNDND0.763ND
Alcoholic beverages0.2090.188NDND0.174NDND0.4030.3560.610NDNDNDNDND0.478NDND0.159NDNDNDND0.17
Table S2

Levels of BPS in composites food samples from the Sixth China Total Diet Study (µg/kg).

Food categories HL LN HE BJ JL SX SN HA NX NM QH GS SH FJ JX JS ZJ SD HB SC GX HN GD GZ
Note: ND: non-detected value, assigned 1/2 LOD in calculations.
Cereals0.1290.3161.9830.068ND0.6750.0330.3880.1691.2690.1280.1520.0600.4950.026.4030.4010.2410.059NDND0.032ND0.021
Legumes1.2131.4081.0450.0310.0250.0741.1690.1602.5431.6390.0210.4660.3043.145ND0.9480.1611.0681.8204.2280.142ND1.9070.076
Potatoes0.1060.2430.1610.029ND0.1450.1560.4650.0360.6480.0240.1830.0580.1220.1360.2650.2580.1160.1480.027ND0.2010.1540.208
Meat0.2038.6386.669NDND2.1824.76816.5870.3782.0440.1200.10011.21567.0930.0396.2913.6482.4814.0710.2290.1040.8460.1411.976
Eggs0.0730.0440.6190.3140.0250.029ND0.0370.2140.0210.0410.0670.6360.2230.2300.1090.0210.1480.019NDND0.0740.0280.022
Aquatic foods2.1590.5986.3440.7430.0911.9211.5012.6220.0260.7571.5060.1314.5863.1270.0230.5090.0870.6441.6210.3690.0340.427ND0.159
Milk0.148NDNDNDNDND0.052ND0.0280.0380.0550.040NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.033NDND
Vegetables0.0730.9680.1730.0560.020.2230.4830.2010.7941.8070.0330.0360.0930.6080.0221.1560.8690.1060.1480.1290.020.0290.0720.124
Fruits0.0711.5980.5340.0530.0480.1220.4650.5230.1001.7140.0320.1710.1690.3290.0990.3470.0580.2560.6240.0300.1000.0390.0260.050
Sugars0.1140.0290.0690.0220.0190.0210.0210.0210.0160.1030.02NDNDNDNDND0.0280.0550.0190.0580.106NDND0.036
Water and beveragesND0.6120.0750.054NDND0.027NDND0.0260.0590.0190.2680.0180.020.099NDNDNDND0.028NDNDND
Alcoholic beverages0.0160.0290.0180.019NDND0.0190.020.083NDND1.537NDNDNDNDND0.0180.029ND0.024ND0.030ND
Table S3

Levels of BPF in composites food samples from the Sixth China Total Diet Study (µg/kg).

Food categories HL LN HE BJ JL SX SN HA NX NM QH GS SH FJ JX JS ZJ SD HB SC GX HN GD GZ
Note: ND: non-detected value, assigned 0 in calculations.
CerealsNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.169
LegumesND0.184ND0.163ND0.4440.383NDNDNDND0.624NDNDND0.288ND0.163ND0.1921.064NDNDND
PotatoesNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.186NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
MeatNDNDND0.261NDNDNDND0.2050.279NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.1680.209NDND
EggsNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Aquatic foods0.169NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.192ND
MilkNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
VegetablesNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.16NDNDNDNDNDND0.190NDNDND
Fruits0.169ND0.156NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.449NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Sugars0.26NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Water and beveragesNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Alcoholic beveragesNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Table S4

Levels of BPAF in composites food samples from the Sixth China Total Diet Study (µg/kg).

Food categories HL LN HE BJ JL SX SN HA NX NM QH GS SH FJ JX JS ZJ SD HB SC GX HN GD GZ
Note: ND: non-detected value, assigned 0 in calculations.
CerealsNDNDND0.026NDNDND0.015NDNDNDND0.1290.040NDNDNDND0.020.015NDND0.051ND
LegumesNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
PotatoesND0.0240.029NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.0160.0190.0180.018NDNDNDNDND0.018ND
MeatND0.530ND0.019NDNDNDNDNDND0.0240.018ND0.015NDND0.021NDNDNDNDNDNDND
EggsNDND0.0300.0380.017NDNDNDNDNDND0.0250.020.0200.019NDND0.0170.2NDND0.0290.0610.02
Aquatic foodsND0.0250.020.027ND0.0150.017NDND0.0160.0190.0250.0530.0170.026ND0.0260.0440.7960.0290.0291.7510.0220.025
MilkNDND0.015NDNDND0.026NDNDND0.016NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Vegetables0.0410.036ND0.0240.0230.018NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.020.026ND0.029NDND0.023ND
Fruits0.021NDND0.021ND0.018ND0.015NDND0.0180.092NDNDNDND0.0250.0520.1750.108NDNDNDND
Sugars0.036ND0.02NDNDNDNDNDND0.043NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.021ND0.02NDNDNDND
Water and beveragesNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Alcoholic beveragesNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Table S5

Estimated BPA and its analogues exposures in three Total Diet Studys (ng/kg body weight per day).

Compound The Fourth TDS 2007 The Fifth TDS 2010−2012 The Sixth TDS (this study) 2016−2019
Note: “−” means not detected. Abbrreviations: BPA=bisphenol A; BPS=bisphenol S; BPF=bisphenol F; BPAF=bisphenol AF; TDS=Total Diet Studys.
BPA4321718.1
BPS25.622.2
BPF25.10.485
BPAF0.4990.384
  10 in total

1.  Relationship between maternal exposure to bisphenol S and pregnancy duration.

Authors:  Yanjian Wan; Wenqian Huo; Shunqing Xu; Tongzhang Zheng; Bin Zhang; Yuanyuan Li; Aifen Zhou; Yiming Zhang; Jie Hu; Yingshuang Zhu; Zhong Chen; Shi Lu; Chuansha Wu; Minmin Jiang; Yangqian Jiang; Hongxiu Liu; Xueyu Yang; Wei Xia
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  LC-MS/MS analysis of bisphenol S and five other bisphenols in total diet food samples.

Authors:  Xu-Liang Cao; Ivana Kosarac; Svetlana Popovic; Simon Zhou; Daryl Smith; Robert Dabeka
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Bisphenol A: Food Exposure and Impact on Human Health.

Authors:  Susana Almeida; António Raposo; Maira Almeida-González; Conrado Carrascosa
Journal:  Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 12.811

4.  Bisphenol A and nonylphenol in foodstuffs: Chinese dietary exposure from the 2007 total diet study and infant health risk from formulas.

Authors:  Yumin Niu; Jing Zhang; Hejun Duan; Yongning Wu; Bing Shao
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 7.514

5.  To which chemical mixtures is the French population exposed? Mixture identification from the second French Total Diet Study.

Authors:  T Traoré; C Béchaux; V Sirot; A Crépet
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 6.023

6.  Concentrations and profiles of bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues in foodstuffs from the United States and their implications for human exposure.

Authors:  Chunyang Liao; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 7.  Bisphenol Analogues Other Than BPA: Environmental Occurrence, Human Exposure, and Toxicity-A Review.

Authors:  Da Chen; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Hongli Tan; Zhengui Zheng; Yong-Lai Feng; Yan Wu; Margaret Widelka
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Concentrations of bisphenol A in the composite food samples from the 2008 Canadian total diet study in Quebec City and dietary intake estimates.

Authors:  X-L Cao; C Perez-Locas; G Dufresne; G Clement; S Popovic; F Beraldin; R W Dabeka; M Feeley
Journal:  Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess       Date:  2011-06

9.  Bisphenol A and Its Analogues in Chinese Total Diets: Contaminated Levels and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Kai Yao; Jing Zhang; Jie Yin; Yunfeng Zhao; Jianzhong Shen; Haiyang Jiang; Bing Shao
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Dietary Exposures and Intake Doses to Bisphenol A and Triclosan in 188 Duplicate-Single Solid Food Items Consumed by US Adults.

Authors:  Marsha K Morgan; Matthew S Clifton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.