| Literature DB >> 35355985 |
Huan Dai1, Rongying Zheng1, Like Wang1, Jinyi Wan1, Yu Tong1, Wei Zhao2, Weixi Zhang1.
Abstract
Rationale: The imbalance of T helper (Th17) cell and regulatory T (Treg) cell are involved in allergic asthma pathogenesis. We hypothesized that ICS/LABA could modulate the Th17/Treg imbalance and that subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) could coordinate with ICS/LABA to rebalance the dysfunction of Th17/Treg.Entities:
Keywords: SCIT (subcutaneous immunotherapy); Th17; Treg; asthma; inhaled glucocorticoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35355985 PMCID: PMC8960042 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.779072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1The Flow chart of dosing schedule of SCIT injection and grouping follow-up.
Characteristic of the study population.
| Control | ICS/LABA | ICS/LABA+SCIT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 15 | 13 | 15 | |
| Age (years) | 9 (7,11) | 7 (6,9.5) | 8 (6,10) | NS |
| Sex (male/female) | 9/6 | 7/6 | 10/5 | NS |
| Constitute | 11/2 | 12/3 | NS | |
| ICS initial dosage (μg/day) | 184.6 ± 16.66 | 192 ± 17.1 | NS | |
| SIgE grade (0/1/2/3/4/5/6) | 15/0/0/0/0/0 | 0/0/1/2/2/5/3 | 0/0/1/0/2/4/8 | NS |
| Eosinophils (%) | 5.169 ± 1.077 | 7.453 ± 0.864 | NS | |
| Eosinophil count (×109/L) | 0.449 ± 0.099 | 0.680 ± 0.072 | NS | |
| PEF%pred (%) | 94.07 ± 3.055 | 74.65 ± 3.673 | 80.69 ± 4.565 | NS |
| FEV1%pred (%) | 106 ± 3.068 | 86.28 ± 3.735 | 87.24 ± 3.669 | NS |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 86.85 ± 1.179 | 89.46 ± 1.483 | 88.63 ± 1.971 | NS |
Median (25% Percentile,75% Percentile).
ICS/LABA v.s. ICS/LABA+SCIT.
Control v.s. ICS/LABA.
Control v.s. ICS/LABA+SCIT.
NS, no significance.
Figure 2Representative flow cytometric analysis figures of CD4+IL-17A+ Th17 cells (A) and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (B).
Figure 3The percentage of Th17 cells in CD4+ T cells (A), IL-17A (B), the percentage of Treg cells in CD4+ T cells (B), IL-10 (D) and the Th17/Treg ratio (E) from individuals in each groupThe monitoring parameters at the time of subject enrolled were compared between groups. (A) The percentage of Th17 cells in CD4+ T cells, (B) IL-17A, (C) the percentage of Treg cells in CD4+ T cells, (D) IL-10, (E) the Th17/Treg ratio. Statistical analyses were performed by unpaired t test for unpaired comparison. **P < 0.01.
Figure 4The percentage of Th17 cells in CD4+ T cells (A-C), IL-17A (D–F), the percentage of Treg cells in CD4+ T cells (G-I), IL-10 (J–L) and the Th17/Treg ratio (M-O) before and after treatment. Connecting lines indicates data obtained in individual before and after corresponding treatment. Statistical analyses were performed by paired t test for paired comparison (bef-treatment vs. treatment patients), while unpaired t test for unpaired comparison (ICS/LABA treated vs. ICS/LABA+SCIT treated control subjects). **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, ns, no significance.