| Literature DB >> 35355665 |
Hidetada Yamada1,2, Masahiro Nakamori2, Tomohisa Nezu2, Teppei Kotozaki1, Juri Kitamura1, Tomohiko Ohshita2, Yoshimasa Sueda1, Hirofumi Maruyama2.
Abstract
Factors that influence the decision of voluntary driving cessation in patients living with Parkinson's disease (PD) are still unclear. We aimed to reveal the factors affecting the decision of voluntary driving cessation in patients with PD. This hospital-based cross-sectional study recruited consecutive outpatients with PD. Data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and medication use were collected from the patients using semistructured interviews. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J). We excluded patients with dementia or motor impairment (Hoehn - Yahr stage > 3). We divided the patients into two groups, with and without voluntary driving cessation (D: driver; RD: retired driver), and conducted investigations using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Of the 40 patients, 8 (20.0%) voluntarily retired from driving. Patients who decided on driving cessation had a higher prevalence of freezing of gait (FOG) (D vs. RD, 25.0% vs. 87.5%; P = 0.001) and tended to have lower scores for attention in the MoCA-J (D vs. RD, 5.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 1.4; P = 0.086). Multivariable analysis showed that FOG was independently associated with driving cessation (odds ratio: 14.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.91-303.74). FOG was associated with voluntary driving cessation in patients with PD without dementia or severe motor impairment. Physicians should consider providing extensive social support to maintain patients' mobility and independence, especially if the patients have these clinical factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35355665 PMCID: PMC8958058 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4047710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurol ISSN: 0953-4180 Impact factor: 3.342
Characteristics and scores of MoCA-J of patients with and without driving cessation.
| Total ( | Driver ( | Retired driver ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 72.3 ± 7.1 | 71.7 ± 7.0 | 74.9 ± 7.2 | 0.258 |
| Female | 22 (55.0) | 17 (53.1) | 5 (62.5) | 0.634 |
| Distance from a patient's home to a hospital (km) | 11.7 ± 9.1 | 11.0 ± 8.8 | 14.6 ± 10.1 | 0.318 |
| Distance from a patient's home to a railway station (km) | 6.1 ± 5.3 | 6.2 ± 5.3 | 5.6 ± 5.8 | 0.785 |
| Years of education (years) | 13.0 ± 2.1 | 12.9 ± 2.2 | 13.4 ± 1.9 | 0.560 |
| H-Y | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.336 |
| Disease duration (years) | 5.7 ± 6.2 | 4.7 ± 3.3 | 9.6 ± 11.9 | 0.042 |
| Levodopa dose (mg) | 325.0 ± 153.6 | 334.4 ± 152.6 | 287.5 ± 162.0 | 0.447 |
| Total anti-Parkinson drug dose† (mg) | 425.2 ± 209.4 | 415.0 ± 213.8 | 466.1 ± 199.0 | 0.544 |
| The prevalence of freezing of gait (total) | 15 (37.5) | 8 (25.0) | 7 (87.5) | 0.001 |
| The prevalence of freezing of gait (during driving) | 1 (2.5) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0.613 |
| The prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness | 12 (30.0) | 8 (25.0) | 4 (50.0) | 0.168 |
| ESS total score | 6.4 ± 4.2 | 6.0 ± 3.5 | 7.8 ± 6.5 | 0.311 |
| MoCA-J total score | 23.4 ± 3.0 | 23.6 ± 3.1 | 22.8 ± 2.4 | 0.501 |
| Memory | 2.2 ± 1.6 | 2.2 ± 1.7 | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 0.742 |
| Visuospatial function | 3.2 ± 1.0 | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 0.808 |
| Executive function | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | 0.670 |
| Attention | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 4.1 ± 1.4 | 0.086 |
| Language | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 0.182 |
| Orientation | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 0.872 |
| Add one point if not educated for >12 years | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 0.492 |
† Levodopa equivalent dosage was calculated using the formula established by Tomlinson et al. [14]. ‡Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD, and noncontinuous data are presented as percentages. MoCA-J: the Japanese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment; H-Y: Hoehn-Yahr stage; ESS: Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Logistic regression analysis to assess driving cessation.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Disease duration (per 1-year increase) | 1.11 (0.92–1.21) | 0.112 | 1.10 (0.96–1.44) | 0.221 |
| Freezing of gait (freezing of gait was present) | 35.68 (4.42–833.32) | <0.001 | 14.46 (1.91–303.74) | 0.008 |
| Attention (per 1 point increase) | 0.58 (0.29–1.09) | 0.090 | 0.75 (0.35–1.53) | 0.427 |
Model 1: each variable is adjusted for age. Model 2: multivariate analysis was performed by variables with P < 0.10 in the univariate analysis. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.