| Literature DB >> 35355663 |
Clara So1, Shinyu Izumi1, Akane Ishida1, Ryo Hirakawa1, Yusaku Kusaba1, Masao Hashimoto1, Satoru Ishii1, Hideki Miyazaki2, Motoyasu Iikura1, Masayuki Hojo1.
Abstract
The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) is an effective and well-tolerated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. However, rare adverse events have been reported. We report two cases of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). A 67-year-old man and a 70-year-old man with underlying ILD presented to our hospital with a few days of fever and respiratory symptoms after receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine. Drug-related pneumonitis due to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was diagnosed. One case was diagnosed with lymphocytic alveolitis by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy. Both patients were successfully treated with corticosteroids, and they attended outpatient clinics thereafter. Although the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines have been established, further studies are needed to estimate long-term data and reports of rare adverse reactions. We present the clinical course of two cases, review previously published case reports on COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-related ILD and discuss the relevant findings.Entities:
Keywords: COVID‐19; interstitial lung disease; mRNA vaccine; steroid; vaccine‐induced pneumonitis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35355663 PMCID: PMC8942814 DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respirol Case Rep ISSN: 2051-3380
Clinical features of COVID‐19 mRNA vaccine‐related ILD and clinical outcomes
| Case | Park et al. | Yoshifuji et al. | Kono et al. | Shimizu et al. | Shimizu et al. | Shimizu et al. | Matsuzaki et al. | Case 1 | Case 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age/sex | 86/Male | 60/Male | 66/Male | 66/Male | 85/Male | 62/Male | 65/Male | 67/Male | 70/Male |
| Smoking status | Non‐smoker | Ex‐smoker | Non‐smoker | Ex‐smoker | Ex‐smoker | Non‐smoker | Ex‐smoker | Ex‐smoker | Non‐smoker |
| Underlying ILD | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Onset since given vaccine | 1 day after the first vaccination | 2 days after the second vaccination | 2 days after the second vaccination | 1 day after the first vaccination | 3–5 days after the first vaccination | 2 days after the second vaccination | 2 days after the first vaccination | 1 day after the first vaccination | 2 days after the second vaccination |
| Symptoms | Fever, dyspnoea | Dyspnoea | Fever | Fever, fatigue | Dyspnoea | Fever | Fever | Fever, dry cough | Fever, dyspnoea |
| RT‐PCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleic acid | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Autoantibodies for CVD | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | MPO‐ANCA (+) | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Serological tests at diagnosis | |||||||||
| KL‐6, U/ml | — | 800.0 | 401.0 | 1306 | 4084 | 297.0 | 214.0 | 2176 | 274.0 |
| SP‐D, ng/ml | — | 155.0 | 145.0 | 376.4 | 675.5 | 189.0 | 73.1 | 253.6 | 173.0 |
| BAL findings | |||||||||
| Macrophages, % | — | 46.9 | — | 55 | 30.7 | — | 1.0 | 33.0 | — |
| Lymphocytes, % | — | 31.3 | — | 42.3 | 62.7 | — | 14.0 | 29.0 | — |
| Neutrophils, % | — | 21.9 | — | 1.7 | 0 | — | 78.0 | 3.0 | — |
| Eosinophils, % | — | 0 | — | 1 | 6.7 | — | 7.0 | 35.0 | — |
| CD4/CD8 | — | 1.26 | — | 1.3 | 6.6 | — | 0.62 | 1.5 | — |
| Treatment provided | mPSL 1 mg/kg | mPSL 1000 mg for 3 days followed by 1 mg/kg/day | mPSL 1000 mg for 3 days followed by PSL 0.5 mg/kg/day | None | mPSL 1000 mg for 3 days followed by PSL 1 mg/kg/day | PSL 20 mg/day | mPSL 1000 mg for 3 days followed by PSL 1 mg/kg/day | mPSL 1000 mg for 3 days followed by PSL 1 mg/kg/day | PSL 0.5 mg/kg/day |
| Intubation period | None | 7 days | 2 days | None | None | None | None | None | None |
| Clinical outcomes | Improved | Improved | Improved | Improved | Improved | Improved | Improved | Improved | Improved |
Note: We defined ‘improved’ as a status in which the patient's symptoms and image findings were relieved, and the patient could be discharged.
Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; CVD, collagen vascular disease; ILD, interstitial lung disease; KL‐6, Krebs von den Lungen 6; MPO‐ANCA, myeloperoxidase‐anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; mPSL, methylprednisolone; PSL, prednisolone; RT‐PCR, real‐time fluorescence polymerase chain reaction; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SP‐D, surfactant protein D.
FIGURE 1High‐resolution computed tomography (CT) images before vaccination (A: December 2020), 1 day after COVID‐19 mRNA vaccination (B: July 2021) and after treatment (C: September 2021). After vaccination, diffuse ground‐glass opacities (GGOs) were superimposed on pre‐existing reticular opacities. The GGOs on chest CT were ameliorated after the treatment
FIGURE 2Histology of a lung specimen obtained by transbronchial lung cryobiopsy. (A) Thickening of the alveolar walls with lymphocytic infiltration (haematoxylin–eosin stain, ×200). (B) The increased collagen fibres were mottled and irregularly distributed. Against the background of these scarring changes, infiltration of inflammatory cells into alveolar walls was observed (Elastica van Gieson staining, ×100)
FIGURE 3Chest radiographs before vaccination (A: September 2020), 2 days after COVID‐19 mRNA vaccination (B: July 2021) and after treatment (C: September 2021). After vaccination, infiltrative shadows in the right lower lobe were visible. These findings ameliorated after the treatment