| Literature DB >> 35355614 |
Shinji Kawasaki1,2, Yukihide Nishimura3, Ken Kouda1, Yasunori Umemoto1, Tokio Kinoshita1,2, Takamasa Hashizaki1,2, Makoto Kawanishi1,2, Taro Nakamura4, Fumihiro Tajima1.
Abstract
Objective: To follow up patients with spinal cord injuries with subdermal low-echoic lesions in the ischial region for abnormalities after 1 year. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: A Japanese rehabilitation center. Participants: We included patients with chronic spinal cord injuries and subdermal low-echoic lesions who underwent routine inspection and palpation examinations (n = 7). Interventions: Education on pressure injury and instruction on pressure relief and seating was provided and the patients were followed up for abnormalities after 1 year. Self-reports were obtained on wheelchair sitting time, and interface pressure was recorded while the patients were seated on the wheelchair. Interface pressure measurements at the bilateral ischial regions were recorded with a force-sensitive application pressure mapping system. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the presence of subdermal low-echoic lesions in the bilateral ischial regions on ultrasonography at the 1-year follow-up examination. Secondary outcomes included wheelchair sitting time and interface pressure in the bilateral ischial regions.Entities:
Keywords: interface pressure; pressure injury; sitting time; spinal cord; ultrasonography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35355614 PMCID: PMC8959625 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.848338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1The flow of participants through the study. aPI examination consists of inspection, palpation, and ultrasonography of the bilateral ischial regions.
Participants' characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 60 | 160 | 53 | 20.7 | 26 | C8 | A |
| 2 | M | 51 | 171 | 65 | 22.0 | 30 | Th8 | A |
| 3 | M | 43 | 182 | 83 | 25.1 | 16 | C7 | A |
| 4 | M | 61 | 164 | 47 | 17.5 | 26 | Th9 | A |
| 5 | M | 60 | 162 | 65 | 24.8 | 46 | Th11 | A |
| 6 | M | 55 | 171 | 53 | 17.9 | 27 | Th6 | A |
| 7 | M | 48 | 168 | 60 | 21.3 | 20 | Th7 | A |
AIS, ASIA impairment scale; ASIA, American Spinal Cord Injury Association; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2Typical ultrasound images. (A) Ultrasound image of normal skin showing a homogeneous pattern of ultrasonic reflections from the epidermis to the right ischial bone (arrow), with a clear layer of muscle. (B) Unclear layered structure with a coarse echo texture (arrow) is most frequently seen even in areas where hypoechoic lesions are not present and judged separately from low-echoic lesions. (C) Low-echoic lesion near the right ischial region in Case 2. The image shows a hypoechoic area near the bone (arrow). This hypoechoic area did not disappear when compressed. (D) Low-echoic lesion near the right ischial region in Case 7. Heterogeneous hypoechoic areas contained high-echoic areas (arrow). The image shows an unclear layered structure and discontinuous fascia. Discontinuous fascia shows a broken or discontinuous line with heterogeneous echo signals (triangle).
Initial pressure injury examination of the study participants.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion |
| 2 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion |
| 3 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| 4 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| 5 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion |
| 6 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion |
| 7 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Wound | Free-floating | Low-echoic lesion |
Rt, right; Lt, left.
This area was an open wound with redness and ulceration on inspection.
This area had a free-floating sensation around the open wound on palpation.
Ultrasound for the examination of pressure injury.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal |
| 2 | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal |
| 3 | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| 4 | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| 5 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal |
| 6 | Normal | Normal | Low-echoic lesion | Normal |
| 7 | Low-echoic lesion | Normal | Open wound | Open wound |
Rt, right; Lt, left.
This area was open wound with redness and ulceration on inspection, and had a free-floating sensation around the open wound on palpation.
Wheelchair sitting time.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 120 | 60 |
| 2 | 15 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 60 | 30 |
| 3 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 8 | 180 | 30 |
| 4 | 16 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 240 | 120 |
| 5 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 240 | 120 |
| 6 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 240 | 30 |
| 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 60 | 30 |
Interface pressure and cushion type.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | >200 | 137 | >200 | 160 | Other air cushion | ROHO cushion |
| 2 | >200 | 156 | >200 | 172 | Form cushion | ROHO cushion |
| 3 | >200 | 105 | 128 | 115 | ROHO cushion | ROHO cushion |
| 4 | >200 | 137 | >200 | 135 | Form cushion | ROHO cushion |
| 5 | >200 | 131 | >200 | 127 | Jay 2 cushion | Jay 2 cushion |
| 6 | >200 | >200 | >200 | >200 | ROHO cushion | ROHO cushione |
| 7 | >200 | >200 | >200 | >200 | ROHO cushion | ROHO cushione |
Rt, right; Lt, left.
These areas were classified as low-echoic lesions and showed no lesions on inspection or palpation.
This area shows wound, free-floating sensation, and low-echoic lesions.
Changed to ROHO cushion (Quadtro Select mid profile).
Instructed how to adjust cushion air and fluid placement.
Changed to ROHO cushion (Quadtro Select high profile) and instructed how to adjust the cushion air.
Figure 3The interface pressure for the force-sensitive applications pressure mapping system in Cases 2 (A,B) and 7 (C,D). (A) Upon examination, the interface pressure near the bilateral ischial regions exceeded the maximum measured value of 200 mmHg. (B) A 1 year follow-up examination. The interface pressure decreased by changing from the form cushion to the ROHO cushion. (C) At the initial examination, the interface pressure near the bilateral ischial regions and greater trochanter exceeded the maximum measured value of 200 mmHg. (D) A 1 year follow-up examination. Even if the cushion type was changed or adjusted, the interface pressure in the ischial region remained above the maximum value.