Literature DB >> 3535519

Predicting acute pelvic inflammatory disease: a multivariate analysis.

A Hadgu, L Westrom, C A Brooks, G H Reynolds, S E Thompson.   

Abstract

A multivariate logistic regression analysis of patient symptoms and signs and laboratory findings associated with the diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease was performed with use of data from 628 women who were clinically diagnosed as having the disease for the first time at the University of Lund, Sweden. In 414 women (65.9%) acute pelvic inflammatory disease was laparoscopically confirmed. We developed a mathematical model that correctly predicted 87.0% of the cases of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and had an overall correct classification rate of 75.6%. Variables that were good predictors of acute pelvic inflammatory disease were purulent vaginal discharge, erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than or equal to 15 mm/hr, positive gonorrhea result, adnexal swelling on bimanual examination, and rectal temperature greater than or equal to 38 degrees C. Furthermore, we developed "mixed model I" and "mixed model II," which combine simple clinical parameters and laparoscopy in varying degrees. In mixed model I the sensitivity, specificity, and overall classification values were 93%, 67.2%, and 84.5%; in mixed model II these values were 100%, 67.2%, and 89.2%. Use of relatively simple and reproducible clinical parameters can identify those women who would most benefit from laparoscopy to diagnose acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3535519     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90324-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic inflammatory disease epidemiology: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  I Simms; J M Stephenson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Clinical versus laboratory screening for sexually transmitted infections prior to insertion of intrauterine contraception among women living with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Othman Kakaire; Josaphat Kayogoza Byamugisha; Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease: time for a rethink.

Authors:  I Simms; F Warburton; L Weström
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefoxitin for uncomplicated and complicated acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  D L Hemsell; M C Heard; P G Hemsell; B J Nobles
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Accuracy of five different diagnostic techniques in mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Hernando Gaitán; Edith Angel; Rodrigo Diaz; Arturo Parada; Lilia Sanchez; Cara Vargas
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002

6.  Association of lower genital tract inflammation with objective evidence of endometritis.

Authors:  J F Peipert; R B Ness; D E Soper; D Bass
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000

7.  Diagnostic evaluation of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  J F Peipert; D E Soper
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994

8.  Performance of clinical and laparoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection.

Authors:  J F Peipert; L A Boardman; C J Sung
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997

9.  Inpatient treatment for uncomplicated and complicated acute pelvic inflammatory disease: ampicillin/sulbactam vs. Cefoxitin.

Authors:  D L Hemsell; G D Wendel; P G Hemsell; M L Heard; B J Nobles
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.