| Literature DB >> 35355174 |
Imanol Setien-Ramos1, Jorge Lugo-Marín2,3, Laura Gisbert-Gustemps4,5,6, Emiliano Díez-Villoria7, María Magán-Maganto7, Ricardo Canal-Bedia7, Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga1,4,5,6.
Abstract
Eye-tracking studies have shown potential in effectively discriminating between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and non-ASD groups. The main objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies in adults with ASD. A total of 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Eyes and Non-Social regions proved better for discriminating between ASD and non-ASD adults, while fixation duration seems to be the outcome to choose. Active engaged tasks seem to reduce differences between ASD and non-ASD adults, regardless of the emotional content of the stimuli/task. Proportional fixation duration on eyes and non-social areas in non-active tasks (e.g. free viewing) seems to be the best eye-tracking design for increasing the sensitivity and specificity in ASD adults.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Autism spectrum disorder; Eye-tracking; Meta-analysis; Systematic review
Year: 2022 PMID: 35355174 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05524-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Autism Dev Disord ISSN: 0162-3257