Literature DB >> 35355149

Increasing shade area in feedlot heifers during heat stress: physiological and performance parameters.

J A Aguilar-Quiñones1, Leonel Avendaño-Reyes2, U Macías-Cruz3, J E Guerra-Liera4, R Vicente-Pérez5, M A Gastélum-Delgado4, R Barajas-Cruz4, S Wittayakun6, A Vicente-Pérez1.   

Abstract

Heat stress is a great challenge for feedlot operations established in arid zones. The aim of this study was to evaluate if increasing shade area in the pen improved physiological and productive variables in feedlot heifers under hot climate. A total of 510 European and Zebu heifers were randomly assigned to six pens which were divided in two treatments: (1) three pens with 100 heifers each with a shade area of 2.7 m2/head (control group [C]); and (2) three pens with 70 heifers each with a shade area of 3.7 m2/head (treated group [T]). Physiological variables respiratory frequency (RF) and body surface temperature (BST) of several anatomic regions were taken from 30 heifers per treatment (i.e., 10 heifers/pen). Feed intake on pen basis was recorded weekly and heifers were individually weighted on days 1, 26, and 66 of the study to calculate performance variables. Relative humidity (RH) and ambient temperature (AT) were recorded and used to estimate the temperature-humidity index (THI). Data was analyzed with analysis of variance. The average THI during the study was 81.7 units, which was categorized as dangerous heat stress. In both shaded areas, European heifers showed higher (P < 0.05) RF than Zebu heifers. In the afternoon, the temperature of head, neck, loin, paddle, and belly was higher (P < 0.05) in C compared with T. Heifers under T showed better (P < 0.05) daily weight gain (DWG), total weight gain (TWG), feed conversion (FC), and feed efficiency (FE) than heifers in C, with no effect on dry matter intake (DMI). Results indicate that during hot summer months, Zebu showed more tolerance to heat stress than European heifers; however, heifers under a shade area of 3.7 m2/head had better productive performance than those under a shade area of 2.7 m2/head during the finishing phase of the feedlot. Increasing the shade area in the finishing phase of beef cattle on feedlot improved some physiological and productive responses during heat stress.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bos indicus; Bos taurus; Heifers; Respiratory frequency; Surface temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35355149     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03152-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  11 in total

1.  Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle.

Authors:  F M Mitlöhner; J L Morrow; J W Dailey; S C Wilson; M L Galyean; M F Miller; J J McGlone
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase.

Authors:  K L Blaine; Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads.

Authors:  G L Hahn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  T L Mader; M S Davis; T Brown-Brandl
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Mapping the body surface temperature of cattle by infrared thermography.

Authors:  Marcia Saladini Vieira Salles; Suelen Corrêa da Silva; Fernando André Salles; Luiz Carlos Roma; Lenira El Faro; Priscilla Ayleen Bustos Mac Lean; Celso Eduardo Lins de Oliveira; Luciane Silva Martello
Journal:  J Therm Biol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.902

6.  Relationships between ambient conditions, thermal status, and feed intake of cattle during summer heat stress with access to shade.

Authors:  A K Curtis; B Scharf; P A Eichen; D E Spiers
Journal:  J Therm Biol       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.902

7.  Evaluation of infrared thermography as a diagnostic tool to predict heat stress events in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Ellen M Unruh; Miles E Theurer; Brad J White; Robert L Larson; James S Drouillard; Nora Schrag
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Effect of shade on body temperature and performance of feedlot steers.

Authors:  J B Gaughan; S Bonner; I Loxton; T L Mader; A Lisle; R Lawrence
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of shade area on performance and welfare of short-fed feedlot cattle.

Authors:  M L Sullivan; A J Cawdell-Smith; T L Mader; J B Gaughan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress.

Authors:  P J Hansen
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.145

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.