| Literature DB >> 35354885 |
Gagan Kalra1, Aniruddha Agarwal2, Alessandro Marchese3, Rupesh Agrawal4,5,6,7,8, Reema Bansal9, Vishali Gupta10.
Abstract
To develop and evaluate a fully automated pipeline that analyzes color fundus images in patients with tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis (TB SLC) for prediction of paradoxical worsening (PW). In this retrospective study, patients with TB SLC with a follow-up of 9 months after initiation of anti-tubercular therapy were included. A fully automated custom-designed pipeline was developed which was initially tested using 12 baseline color fundus photographs for assessment of repeatability. After confirming reliability using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the pipeline was deployed for all patients. The images were preprocessed to exclude the optic nerve from the fundus photo using a single-shot trainable WEKA segmentation algorithm. Two automatic thresholding algorithms were applied, and quantitative metrics were generated. These metrics were compared between PW + and PW- groups using non-parametric tests. A logistic regression model was used to predict probability of PW for assessing binary classification performance and receiver operator curves were generated to choose a sensitivity-optimized threshold. The study included 139 patients (139 eyes; 92 males and 47 females; mean age: 44.8 ± 11.3 years) with TB SLC. Pilot analysis of 12 images showed an excellent ICC for measuring the mean area, intensity, and integrated pixel intensity (all ICC > 0.89). The PW + group had significantly higher mean lesion area (p = 0.0152), mean pixel intensity (p = 0.0181), and integrated pixel intensity (p < 0.0001) compared to the PW- group. Using a sensitivity optimized threshold cut-off for mean pixel intensity, an area under the curve of 0.87 was achieved (sensitivity: 96.80% and specificity: 72.09%). Automated calculation of lesion metrics such as mean pixel intensity and segmented area in TB SLC is a novel approach with good repeatability in predicting PW during the follow-up.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35354885 PMCID: PMC8967847 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09338-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic describing our workflow for the classification pipeline.
Figure 2(A) Color fundus photograph of a representative case with TBSLC lesion; (B) Pre-processed image; (C) Lesion area selection obtained after image segmentation step.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis in PW + and PW- groups.
| Variable | PW + group | PW- Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients (n) | 44 | 95 | – | |
| Age (years ± stdev) | 42.94 ± 7.84 | 46.07 ± 6.23 | 0.66 | |
| Male (n) | 27 | 62 | 0.83 | |
| Female (n) | 14 | 33 | ||
| Duration of symptoms (weeks) | 3.81 ± 2.29 | 4.07 ± 3.16 | 0.52 | |
| Baseline BCVA (LogMAR)* | 0.92 ± 0.31 | 0.87 ± 0.39 | 0.76 | |
*: Best Corrected Visual Acuity.
Repeatability analysis from 12 images from 6 patients (6 eyes) from the fully automated ImageJ based analysis.
| Metric | Mean pixel intensity* | Area of lesion** | Integrated pixel intensity^ |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICC† | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
*: Indicates mean of pixel intensities in the selected region of interest.
**: Indicates the area of selected region of interest (in pixel squared).
^: Integrated pixel intensity: Indicates the product of Mean Pixel Intensity and Area of Lesion.
†ICC: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient to assess repeatability.
Figure 3(A), (C), and (E) show Bland–Altman plots for the pilot analysis comparing measurements of lesion area, mean pixel intensity, and product of lesion area and mean pixel intensity respectively, from two images from each of the 6 patients from the same visit. (B), (D), and (F) show box and whisker plots for lesion area, mean pixel intensity, and product of lesion area and mean pixel intensity respectively.
Comparison of colour fundus photography quantitative biomarkers between PW + and PW- groups.
| Imaging biomarker | Paradoxical Worsening (PW +) group [Mean (95% CI)] | Non-paradoxical Worsening (PW-) group [Mean (95% CI)] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Pixel Intensity* | 102.25 (94.75–110.14) | 74.44 (67.05–71.83) | 0.0181 |
| Minimum Pixel Intensity** | 91.02 (85.56–96.49) | 71.68 (69.61–73.76) | < 0.0001 |
| Maximum Pixel Intensity^ | 155.30 (147.30–163.30) | 78.76 (76.98–80.53) | < 0.0001 |
| Area of Lesion† | 49,265 (40,890–57,639) | 37,374 (32,668–42,080) | 0.0152 |
| Integrated Pixel Intensity‡ | 4,843,904 (3,972,554–5,715,255 | 2,687,416 (2,375,891–2,998,941) | < 0.0001 |
*: Indicates mean of pixel intensities in the selected region of interest.
**: Indicates the minima of pixel intensities in the selected region of interest.
^: Indicates the maxima of the pixel intensities in the selected region of interest.
†: Indicates the area of selected region of interest (in pixel squared).
‡: Indicates the product of Mean Pixel Intensity and Area of Lesion.
Figure 4Scatter plots with linear relation lines for (A) mean pixel intensity; (B); lesion area, and (C) product of mean pixel intensity and lesion area.
Figure 5Receiver operator curve (ROC) and area under curve (AUC) for identifying PW + and PW- patients using mean pixel intensity measured using our algorithm. True positivity percentage or sensitivity is represented across the y-axis and false positivity percentage or (1-specificity) is represented across the x-axis.