| Literature DB >> 35354812 |
Rina Takagi1,2,3,4, Naofumi Matsuyama5, Victor Ukleev6, Le Yu6,7,8, Jonathan S White6, Sonia Francoual9, José R L Mardegan9, Satoru Hayami5,10, Hiraku Saito11, Koji Kaneko12,13, Kazuki Ohishi14, Yoshichika Ōnuki15, Taka-Hisa Arima15,16, Yoshinori Tokura5,15,17, Taro Nakajima15,11, Shinichiro Seki5,18,10,15.
Abstract
Magnetic skyrmions are topologically stable swirling spin textures with particle-like character, and have been intensively studied as a candidate of high-density information bit. While magnetic skyrmions were originally discovered in noncentrosymmetric systems with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, recently a nanometric skyrmion lattice has also been reported for centrosymmetric rare-earth compounds, such as Gd2PdSi3 and GdRu2Si2. For the latter systems, a distinct skyrmion formation mechanism mediated by itinerant electrons has been proposed, and the search of a simpler model system allowing for a better understanding of their intricate magnetic phase diagram is highly demanded. Here, we report the discovery of square and rhombic lattices of nanometric skyrmions in a centrosymmetric binary compound EuAl4, by performing small-angle neutron and resonant elastic X-ray scattering experiments. Unlike previously reported centrosymmetric skyrmion-hosting materials, EuAl4 shows multiple-step reorientation of the fundamental magnetic modulation vector as a function of magnetic field, probably reflecting a delicate balance of associated itinerant-electron-mediated interactions. The present results demonstrate that a variety of distinctive skyrmion orders can be derived even in a simple centrosymmetric binary compound, which highlights rare-earth intermetallic systems as a promising platform to realize/control the competition of multiple topological magnetic phases in a single material.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35354812 PMCID: PMC8967868 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29131-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Magnetic phase diagram of EuAl4.
a Crystal structure of EuAl4. b H(magnetic field)-T(temperature) phase diagram for H || [001] determined from T and H dependences of magnetization, M (black triangular and circle symbols, respectively), and the H dependence of Hall resistivity, ρ (red square symbols). FM and PM represent the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic states, respectively. c Schematic illustration of the skyrmion spin texture. d Schematic illustration of the experimental geometry for the SANS measurement. kin and kout are the incident and scattered neutron wave vectors, respectively. e–g Magnetic-field dependence of magnetization M (e), longitudinal resistivity ρ (f), and Hall resistivity ρ (g) at 4 K for H || [001] and I || [100]. Black filled and red open circles correspond to the field-increasing and -decreasing processes, respectively.
Fig. 2Magnetic-field dependence of SANS patterns for EuAl4.
a–d Typical SANS patterns taken at 5.0 K at various strengths of magnetic field for H || [001]. The color scale indicates the integrated intensity. e–h Schematics of the screw (e), rhombic skyrmion lattice (f), square skyrmion lattice (g), and vortex-lattice (h) spin textures. Each phase is characterized by distinctive orientation of the fundamental magnetic modulation vectors Q1 and Q2. The rhombic and square skyrmion lattice states are the double-Q states described by Eq. (2), i.e., the superposition of two obliquely or orthogonally modulated spin helices. Background color represents the out-of-plane component of local magnetic moment m. See Supplementary Note VII and VIII for the detailed spin texture in phase IV.
Fig. 3Magnetic-field dependence of the magnetic modulation vectors in EuAl4.
a, b Schematic illustrations of Area 1 and Area 2 used for the SANS intensity integration. c, d The SANS integrated intensities for Area 1 (a) and Area 2 (b) as a function of magnetic field for H || [001] at 5.0 K. The colored lines in (c, d) are guides to the eye, showing the assignment of each magnetic reflection to either Q1 or Q1 + Q2. e, f Magnetic-field dependence of the wavenumber |Q| (e) and azimuth angle θ (f) of the fundamental magnetic modulation vector Q1. Here, θ is defined as the angle between the Q-direction and the [110] axis, as shown in Fig. 2a. g, h The corresponding data for the higher-order Q1 + Q2 magnetic satellite reflection. The black curves in (g, h) represent the theoretical |Q| and θ values for Q1 + Q2 reflection calculated from fundamental magnetic reflections in (e, f), which agree well with the experimental data. The gray regions between phases I and II indicate the phase coexistence region (see Supplementary Note IV).
Fig. 4Polarized SANS study of the modulated magnetic states.
a, b Schematic illustration of (a) experimental setup and (b) the magnetic scattering selection rules. Sn represents the direction of the neutron polarization, which is aligned parallel or antiparallel with kin || [001]. Only a modulated spin component normal to Q can give rise to magnetic neutron scattering. In this setup, spin-flip (SF) scattering arises due to the in-plane component of perpendicular to both Q and Sn || [001] (red arrow), and non-spin-flip (NSF) scattering arises due to the out-of-plane component of parallel to Sn || [001] (blue arrow). c Temperature variations of the scattering intensity of SF and NSF channels at 1 T. d, e Schematic illustration of SANS patterns for phases II and III. The arrows indicate the line-scan directions of (f–i). f–i Line-scan profiles for (f, g) spin-flip and (h, i) non-spin-flip channels measured in phases II and III at 1 T, which detect in-plane and out-of-plane component of (i.e. and ), respectively. Here, the scattering intensity is integrated for the range of q = 0.175 ± 0.005 Å-1. The asymmetry of two peak intensities in phase II (f, h) is probably due to different populations of the two equivalent magnetic domains.