Literature DB >> 35353319

The Current Landscape of Research Advocacy and Education for Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Reese M Garcia1, Andrea J Dwyer2, Sharyn Worrall3, Keavy McAbee3, Anjelica Q Davis3.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Research advocacy is an evolving concept and should be tailored for the colorectal cancer research community. Research advocacy training and evaluation must be designed for the patient community with their insight included at each step of engagement, training, and implementation. Patient advocates bring a great deal of expertise to the research review process, but it is important to ensure that their insight is appropriately placed, and they bring an appropriate orientation to the research process as the most informed patient. This can be accomplished in part by providing advocates with the proper training, employing universal core competencies, and applying principles of adult learning. Additionally, the research community, advocacy organizations, and industry partners must understand the need to diversify the voices that are being leveraged to guide research, recognizing the importance of adequate mental health tools and compensation commensurate with their experience. As a community, it is necessary that we create and implement training programs, as well as evaluate and measure their impact to continually improve and tailor the delivery of this specific education. Research advocacy has become a necessity to the field, and when implemented effectively, research advocates can have a significant impact on the delivery of health care research, improving health outcomes for all those affected by colorectal cancer.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Patient advocacy; Patient centricity; Patient education; Patient engagement; Research advocacy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35353319     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00970-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  1 in total

1.  Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study.

Authors:  Ilya Ivlev; Kelly J Vander Ley; Jack Wiedrick; Kira Lesley; Amy Forester; Rebekah Webb; Marina Broitman; Karen B Eden
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.