Bianca Aibuedefe1, Kendall S Hamilton2, Valeda Yong3, Sarah M Kling3, Huaqing Zhao4, Juan L Poggio5. 1. Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. kendall.hamilton@temple.edu. 3. Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Education and Data Science, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 5. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital and Jeanes Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the disparities for minority patients with cancer have been well established, few studies have illustrated disparities in cancer outcomes while controlling for potential confounding factors. The current study was designed to address these confounding variables and how they influence the treatment and survival time for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, black and Hispanic patients were compared with white patients with rectal cancer for the rates of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery in addition to survival time after diagnosis. Following this analysis, confounding variables were controlled for and analysis was repeated with groups of comparable demographic variables. RESULTS: Before controlling for confounding variables, there were significant differences in treatment and survival for both Hispanic and black patients compared with white. Following matching, black patients continued to have lower rates of treatment and shorter survival times. CONCLUSIONS: These differences in treatment methods and survival outcomes for minorities, particularly black patients, highlight the need for more advocacy and focus on these underrepresented populations with rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: While the disparities for minority patients with cancer have been well established, few studies have illustrated disparities in cancer outcomes while controlling for potential confounding factors. The current study was designed to address these confounding variables and how they influence the treatment and survival time for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, black and Hispanic patients were compared with white patients with rectal cancer for the rates of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery in addition to survival time after diagnosis. Following this analysis, confounding variables were controlled for and analysis was repeated with groups of comparable demographic variables. RESULTS: Before controlling for confounding variables, there were significant differences in treatment and survival for both Hispanic and black patients compared with white. Following matching, black patients continued to have lower rates of treatment and shorter survival times. CONCLUSIONS: These differences in treatment methods and survival outcomes for minorities, particularly black patients, highlight the need for more advocacy and focus on these underrepresented populations with rectal cancer.
Authors: Chyke A Doubeni; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jacqueline M Major; Mario Schootman; Min Lian; Yikyung Park; Barry I Graubard; Albert R Hollenbeck; Rashmi Sinha Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R M Mayberry; R J Coates; H A Hill; L A Click; V W Chen; D F Austin; C K Redmond; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; C P Hunter; M A Haynes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-11-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Yinzhi Lai; Chun Wang; Jesse M Civan; Juan P Palazzo; Zhong Ye; Terry Hyslop; Jianqing Lin; Ronald E Myers; Bingshan Li; Binghua Jiang; Ashwin Sama; Jinliang Xing; Hushan Yang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 22.682