Literature DB >> 35353118

Assessment of Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography Diagnostics in Differentiating Takotsubo Syndrome From Myocardial Infarction.

Fabian Laumer1, Davide Di Vece2, Victoria L Cammann2, Michael Würdinger2, Vanya Petkova2, Maximilian Schönberger2, Alexander Schönberger2, Julien C Mercier2, David Niederseer2, Burkhardt Seifert3, Moritz Schwyzer4, Rebekka Burkholz1, Luca Corinzia1, Anton S Becker4, Frank Scherff2, Sofie Brouwers2, Aju P Pazhenkottil2,5, Svetlana Dougoud2, Michael Messerli5, Felix C Tanner2, Thomas Fischer6, Victoria Delgado7, P Christian Schulze8, Christian Hauck9, Lars S Maier9, Ha Nguyen10, Sven Y Surikow10, John Horowitz10, Kan Liu11, Rodolfo Citro12,13, Jeroen Bax7, Frank Ruschitzka2, Jelena-Rima Ghadri2, Joachim M Buhmann1, Christian Templin3.   

Abstract

Importance: Machine learning algorithms enable the automatic classification of cardiovascular diseases based on raw cardiac ultrasound imaging data. However, the utility of machine learning in distinguishing between takotsubo syndrome (TTS) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been studied.
Objectives: To assess the utility of machine learning systems for automatic discrimination of TTS and AMI. Design, Settings, and Participants: This cohort study included clinical data and transthoracic echocardiogram results of patients with AMI from the Zurich Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry and patients with TTS obtained from 7 cardiovascular centers in the International Takotsubo Registry. Data from the validation cohort were obtained from April 2011 to February 2017. Data from the training cohort were obtained from March 2017 to May 2019. Data were analyzed from September 2019 to June 2021. Exposure: Transthoracic echocardiograms of 224 patients with TTS and 224 patients with AMI were analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the machine learning system evaluated on an independent data set and 4 practicing cardiologists for comparison. Echocardiography videos of 228 patients were used in the development and training of a deep learning model. The performance of the automated echocardiogram video analysis method was evaluated on an independent data set consisting of 220 patients. Data were matched according to age, sex, and ST-segment elevation/non-ST-segment elevation (1 patient with AMI for each patient with TTS). Predictions were compared with echocardiographic-based interpretations from 4 practicing cardiologists in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and AUC calculated from confidence scores concerning their binary diagnosis.
Results: In this cohort study, apical 2-chamber and 4-chamber echocardiographic views of 110 patients with TTS (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [12.1] years; 103 [90.4%] were female) and 110 patients with AMI (mean [SD] age, 69.1 [12.2] years; 103 [90.4%] were female) from an independent data set were evaluated. This approach achieved a mean (SD) AUC of 0.79 (0.01) with an overall accuracy of 74.8 (0.7%). In comparison, cardiologists achieved a mean (SD) AUC of 0.71 (0.03) and accuracy of 64.4 (3.5%) on the same data set. In a subanalysis based on 61 patients with apical TTS and 56 patients with AMI due to occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the model achieved a mean (SD) AUC score of 0.84 (0.01) and an accuracy of 78.6 (1.6%), outperforming the 4 practicing cardiologists (mean [SD] AUC, 0.72 [0.02]) and accuracy of 66.9 (2.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a real-time system for fully automated interpretation of echocardiogram videos was established and trained to differentiate TTS from AMI. While this system was more accurate than cardiologists in echocardiography-based disease classification, further studies are warranted for clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35353118      PMCID: PMC8968683          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   30.154


  24 in total

1.  Machine Learning and the Profession of Medicine.

Authors:  Alison M Darcy; Alan K Louie; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Contemporary Imaging in Takotsubo Syndrome.

Authors:  Rodolfo Citro; Gianluca Pontone; Leonardo Pace; Concetta Zito; Angelo Silverio; Eduardo Bossone; Federico Piscione
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 3.  Takotsubo syndrome: aetiology, presentation and treatment.

Authors:  Ken Kato; Alexander R Lyon; Jelena-R Ghadri; Christian Templin
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Machine Learning Analysis of Left Ventricular Function to Characterize Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Sergio Sanchez-Martinez; Nicolas Duchateau; Tamas Erdei; Gabor Kunszt; Svend Aakhus; Anna Degiovanni; Paolo Marino; Erberto Carluccio; Gemma Piella; Alan G Fraser; Bart H Bijnens
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; HongJu Zhang; Zhen Wang; Mehmet Aydar; Takeshi Kitai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Prognostic Value of Combined Clinical and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Data Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Julian Betancur; Yuka Otaki; Manish Motwani; Mathews B Fish; Mark Lemley; Damini Dey; Heidi Gransar; Balaji Tamarappoo; Guido Germano; Tali Sharir; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-10-18

8.  Utility of a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Guide Novices to Acquire Echocardiograms for Limited Diagnostic Use.

Authors:  Akhil Narang; Richard Bae; Ha Hong; Yngvil Thomas; Samuel Surette; Charles Cadieu; Ali Chaudhry; Randolph P Martin; Patrick M McCarthy; David S Rubenson; Steven Goldstein; Stephen H Little; Roberto M Lang; Neil J Weissman; James D Thomas
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Criteria, and Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Jelena-Rima Ghadri; Ilan Shor Wittstein; Abhiram Prasad; Scott Sharkey; Keigo Dote; Yoshihiro John Akashi; Victoria Lucia Cammann; Filippo Crea; Leonarda Galiuto; Walter Desmet; Tetsuro Yoshida; Roberto Manfredini; Ingo Eitel; Masami Kosuge; Holger M Nef; Abhishek Deshmukh; Amir Lerman; Eduardo Bossone; Rodolfo Citro; Takashi Ueyama; Domenico Corrado; Satoshi Kurisu; Frank Ruschitzka; David Winchester; Alexander R Lyon; Elmir Omerovic; Jeroen J Bax; Patrick Meimoun; Guiseppe Tarantini; Charanjit Rihal; Shams Y-Hassan; Federico Migliore; John D Horowitz; Hiroaki Shimokawa; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Christian Templin
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Fully Automated Echocardiogram Interpretation in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey Zhang; Sravani Gajjala; Pulkit Agrawal; Geoffrey H Tison; Laura A Hallock; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Mats H Lassen; Eugene Fan; Mandar A Aras; ChaRandle Jordan; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Michelle Melisko; Atif Qasim; Sanjiv J Shah; Ruzena Bajcsy; Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Gender Differences in Takotsubo Syndrome.

Authors:  Tsutomu Murakami; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24

Review 2.  Machines that save lives in the intensive care unit: the ultrasonography machine.

Authors:  Paul H Mayo; Michelle Chew; Ghislaine Douflé; Armand Mekontso-Dessap; Mangala Narasimhan; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 41.787

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.