| Literature DB >> 35352235 |
Aleksi J Sihvonen1,2, Seppo Soinila3, Teppo Särkämö4.
Abstract
Post-stroke neuroplasticity and cognitive recovery can be enhanced by multimodal stimulation via environmental enrichment. In this vein, recent studies have shown that enriched sound environment (i.e., listening to music) during the subacute post-stroke stage improves cognitive outcomes compared to standard care. The beneficial effects of post-stroke music listening are further pronounced when listening to music containing singing, which enhances language recovery coupled with structural and functional connectivity changes within the language network. However, outside the language network, virtually nothing is known about the effects of enriched sound environment on the structural connectome of the recovering post-stroke brain. Here, we report secondary outcomes from a single-blind randomized controlled trial (NCT01749709) in patients with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke (N = 38) who were randomly assigned to listen to vocal music, instrumental music, or audiobooks during the first 3 post-stroke months. Utilizing the longitudinal diffusion-weighted MRI data of the trial, the present study aimed to determine whether the music listening interventions induce changes on structural white matter connectome compared to the control audiobook intervention. Both vocal and instrumental music groups increased quantitative anisotropy longitudinally in multiple left dorsal and ventral tracts as well as in the corpus callosum, and also in the right hemisphere compared to the audiobook group. Audiobook group did not show increased structural connectivity changes compared to both vocal and instrumental music groups. This study shows that listening to music, either vocal or instrumental promotes wide-spread structural connectivity changes in the post-stroke brain, providing a fertile ground for functional restoration.Entities:
Keywords: Environmental enrichment; Music; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Structural connectivity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35352235 PMCID: PMC9279272 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-022-00661-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Imaging Behav ISSN: 1931-7557 Impact factor: 3.224
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients
| Demographic | ||||
| Sex (male/female) | 5/7 | 11/4 | 7/4 | 0.239 (χ2) |
| Age (years) | 58.5 (30.0) | 55.0 (12.0) | 61.0 (20.3) | 0.218 ( |
| Education (years) | 14.8 (3.6) | 13.0 (6.0) | 11.5 (5.3) | 0.450 ( |
| Music background (pre-stroke) | ||||
| Formal music traininga | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (1.0) | 0.218 (H) |
| Instrument playinga | 0.0 (5.0) | 0.0 (3.0) | 0.0 (5.0) | 0.762 (H) |
| Music listening prior to strokea | 5.0 (0.8) | 5.0 (0.0) | 5.0 (3.0) | 0.265 (H) |
| Clinical | ||||
| Stroke type (infarct/haemorrhage) | 10/2 | 9/6 | 7/4 | 0.398 (χ2) |
| Verbal fluencyb | 7.5 (8.8) | 9.0 (9.5) | 10.0 (5.0) | 0.715 (H) |
| Namingc | 18.5 (3.3) | 18.0 (3.0) | 18.0 (4.0) | 0.444 (H) |
| Auditory Comprehensiond | 30.0 (2.5) | 29.0 (6.0) | 27.0 (10.0) | 0.112 (H) |
| Amusia Overalle (no/yes) | 5/7 | 9/6 | 2/9 | 0.103 (χ2) |
| Lesion laterality (left/right) | 6/6 | 7/8 | 7/4 | 0.676 (χ2) |
| Lesion volume in cm3 | 29.0 (71.1) | 45.3 (88.3) | 18.5 (11.2) | 0.712 ( |
Data are median (IQR) unless otherwise stated. Significant group differences are shown in bold
F one-way ANOVA, H Kruskal–Wallis test, χ2 chi-square test
aLikert scale 0–5 (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = once a month, 3 = once a week, 4 = 2–3 times a week, 5 = daily)
bClassification based on Verbal Fluency Test
cClassification based on shortened Boston Naming test
dClassification based on shortened Token Test
eClassification based on the MBEA Scale & Rhythm subtest average score (< 75% cut-off)
Fig. 1Structural white matter connectometry changes (3 months > Acute). Significant changes in connectometry showing increased structural white matter connectivity between (A) VMG and ABG (3 months > Acute) and (B) IMG and ABG (3 months > Acute). ABG = Audiobook group, IMG = Instrumental music group, L = left, QA = Quantitative anisotropy, R = right, VMG = Vocal music group
Fig. 2Comparison of significant connectometry findings. (A) Positively associated white matter tracts for VMG > ABG (red) and IMG > ABG (blue). (B) Positively associated white matter tracts for VMG only [(VMG > ABG) – (IMG > ABG)] (green) and IMG only [(IMG > ABG) – (VMG > ABG)] (yellow). ABG = Audiobook group, IMG = Instrumental music group, L = left, QA = Quantitative anisotropy, R = right, VMG = Vocal music group