Literature DB >> 35351827

Cortico-Striatal Control over Adaptive Goal-Directed Responding Elicited by Cues Signaling Sucrose Reward or Punishment.

Laurie Hamel1, Bilgehan Cavdaroglu1, Dylan Yeates1, David Nguyen1, Sadia Riaz1, Dylan Patterson2, Nisma Khan1, Nardin Kirolos1, Katherine Roper1, Quynh An Ha1, Rutsuko Ito3,2.   

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) have been associated with the expression of adaptive and maladaptive behavior elicited by fear-related and drug-associated cues. However, reported effects of mPFC manipulations on cue-elicited natural reward-seeking and inhibition thereof have been varied, with few studies examining cortico-striatal contributions in tasks that require adaptive responding to cues signaling reward and punishment within the same session. The current study aimed to better elucidate the role of mPFC and NAc subdivisions, and their functional connectivity in cue-elicited adaptive responding using a novel discriminative cue responding task. Male Long-Evans rats learned to lever-press on a VR5 schedule for a discriminative cue signaling reward, and to avoid pressing the same lever in the presence of another cue signaling punishment. Postacquisition, prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) areas of the mPFC, NAc core, shell, PL-core, or IL-shell circuits were pharmacologically or chemogenetically inhibited while animals performed under (1) nonreinforced (extinction) conditions, where the appetitive and aversive cues were presented in alternating trials alone or as a compound stimulus; and (2) reinforced conditions, whereby cued responding was accompanied by associated outcomes. PL and IL inactivation attenuated nonreinforced and reinforced goal-directed cue responding, whereas NAc core and shell inactivation impaired nonreinforced responding for the appetitive, but not aversive cue. Furthermore, PL-core and IL-shell inhibition disinhibited nonreinforced but not reinforced cue responding. Our findings implicate the mPFC as a site of confluence of motivationally significant cues and outcomes, and in the regulation of nonreinforced cue responding via downstream NAc targets.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The ability to discriminate and respond appropriately to environmental cues that signal availability of reward or punishment is essential for survival. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) have been implicated in adaptive and maladaptive behavior elicited by fear-related and drug-associated cues. However, less is known about the role they play in orchestrating adaptive responses to natural reward and punishment cues within the same behavioral task. Here, using a novel discriminative cue responding task combined with pharmacological or chemogenetic inhibition of mPFC, NAc and mPFC-NAc circuits, we report that mPFC is critically involved in responding to changing cued response-outcomes, both when the responses are reinforced, and nonreinforced. Furthermore, the mPFC coordinates nonreinforced discriminative cue responding by suppressing inappropriate responding via downstream NAc targets.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medial prefrontal cortex; motivation; nucleus accumbens; punishment; reward; stimulus discrimination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35351827      PMCID: PMC9087743          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2175-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  73 in total

1.  Positive and negative motivation in nucleus accumbens shell: bivalent rostrocaudal gradients for GABA-elicited eating, taste "liking"/"disliking" reactions, place preference/avoidance, and fear.

Authors:  Sheila M Reynolds; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Prefrontal cortex mediates extinction of responding by two distinct neural mechanisms in accumbens shell.

Authors:  Ali Ghazizadeh; Frederic Ambroggi; Naomi Odean; Howard L Fields
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The hippocampal-striatal axis in learning, prediction and goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  C M A Pennartz; R Ito; P F M J Verschure; F P Battaglia; T W Robbins
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Choice for Drug or Natural Reward Engages Largely Overlapping Neuronal Ensembles in the Infralimbic Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Simone Pfarr; Laura Schaaf; Janine K Reinert; Elisabeth Paul; Frank Herrmannsdörfer; Martin Roßmanith; Thomas Kuner; Anita C Hansson; Rainer Spanagel; Christoph Körber; Wolfgang H Sommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The projections of the ventral tegmental area and adjacent regions: a combined fluorescent retrograde tracer and immunofluorescence study in the rat.

Authors:  L W Swanson
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1982 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Neurons in rat medial prefrontal cortex show anticipatory rate changes to predictable differential rewards in a spatial memory task.

Authors:  W E Pratt; S J Mizumori
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Prelimbic to Accumbens Core Pathway Is Recruited in a Dopamine-Dependent Manner to Drive Cued Reinstatement of Cocaine Seeking.

Authors:  Ellen M McGlinchey; Morgan H James; Stephen V Mahler; Caroline Pantazis; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Topographical organization of the efferent projections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: an anterograde tract-tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin.

Authors:  S R Sesack; A Y Deutch; R H Roth; B S Bunney
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-12-08       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Differential Contributions of Nucleus Accumbens Subregions to Cue-Guided Risk/Reward Decision Making and Implementation of Conditional Rules.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; David R Montes; Maric M T Tse; Mieke van Holstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Losing Control: Excessive Alcohol Seeking after Selective Inactivation of Cue-Responsive Neurons in the Infralimbic Cortex.

Authors:  Simone Pfarr; Marcus W Meinhardt; Manuela L Klee; Anita C Hansson; Valentina Vengeliene; Kai Schönig; Dusan Bartsch; Bruce T Hope; Rainer Spanagel; Wolfgang H Sommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.