Literature DB >> 3535137

The biomechanical effects of tight suture closure upon fascia.

I K Stone, J A von Fraunhofer, B J Masterson.   

Abstract

The biomechanical effect of tight suture closure of fascial incisions in male rats was evaluated. The incision of rats in group 1 was closed with maximum tension on the first throw of the approximating knot. The incision of rats in group 2 was closed in a similar manner, however a 3.14 squared millimeter rod was placed in the suture loop before securing the first throw. The rod was removed after the knot was formed and fascial edges were observed to be loosely approximated. All rats were sacrificed after seven days. The abdominal fascial and muscle unit was dissected and a 1 by 6 centimeter strip containing two suture loops was excised. Scanning electron microscopic examination of tissue specimens, tensile strength measurements and energy-to-failure under tensile loading studies were performed. Specimens for hydroxyproline assay were obtained from the tissue immediately surrounding the incision and between two suture loops. The scanning electron microphotographs of group 1 showed tissue overlap from the excessive force on the initial knot throws. Wounds loosely approximated had proper alignment of the wound edges and had greater proliferative activity in the clefts of the wounds. The tensile strength and energy-to-failure studies showed loosely approximated wounds to be far stronger (p less than 0.001). No statistically significant difference (p greater than 0.05) was found between hydroxyproline assays of the two groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3535137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  10 in total

1.  Tensile strength and host response towards different polypropylene implant materials used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model.

Authors:  Maja L Konstantinovic; Eline Pille; Marta Malinowska; Eric Verbeken; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-10-10

2.  Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Rachel M Clark
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  The use of barbed sutures in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

4.  Surgical sutures: coincidence or experience?

Authors:  K-T von Trotha; J Grommes; N Butz; A Lambertz; C D Klink; U P Neumann; M Jacobs; M Binnebösel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Randi H Goldman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manuel Ferrer-Márquez; Ricardo Belda-Lozano; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model.

Authors:  Christian D Klink; Marcel Binnebösel; Hamid P Alizai; Andreas Lambertz; Klaus T Vontrotha; Elmar Junker; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug; Ulf P Neumann; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Surgical benefits of bidirectional knotless barbed sutures over conventional sutures for uterine repair during cesarean section-A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Preeti Deedwania; Abhishek Singh; Tejas Patel
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-28

9.  Force sensing in surgical sutures.

Authors:  Tim Horeman; Evert-Jan Meijer; Joris J Harlaar; Johan F Lange; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Holding Strength of Suture: An Experimental Study Using Porcine Kidney.

Authors:  Ünsal Özkuvanci; Haluk Akpinar; Mert Ali Karadag; Muhammet İrfan Dönmez; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.