| Literature DB >> 35350637 |
Wen-Tsao Pan1, Wu Zhonghuan2,3, Chen Shiqi1, Xiao Siyi1, Tang Yanping1, Liang Danying1.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has spread across the country negatively impacting on the economy. This paper uses the panel data of 14 prefecture-level cities from 2015 to 2020 in Hunan to determine the factors and effects of economic downturns based on the spatial econometric model. We calculate the Moran index, so-called the Moran's I, to analyse the impact of each factor on the economy. The results show that the spatial correlation of the cities around Chang-Zhu-Tan is high, and the economic growth of the entire province can be influenced by these cities. These cities should adopt strategies to improve the economy, such as reducing the tax revenues, improving the local financial revenues, and reducing the ineffective educational input. These results can also be helpful for policymakers, who will attempt to retransform the Hunan economy during the post-COVID era.Entities:
Keywords: LM test; The post-COVID era; national economy; panel data regression analysis; spatial autocorrelation analysis; spatial econometric model
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35350637 PMCID: PMC8957816 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.802197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Regional GDP of Hunan province in 6 years.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 41781.49 | 3.8 |
| 2019 | 39752.1 | 7.6 |
| 2018 | 36425.78 | 7.8 |
| 2017 | 34590.6 | 8 |
| 2016 | 31244.7 | 7.9 |
| 2015 | 29047.2 | 8.6 |
GDP, gross domestic product.
Mean = 35473.645; SD = 4452.7816; Coefficient of variation 0.125523657.
Figure 1The impact of local fiscal revenue (x1).
Figure 2The impact of local fiscal revenue (x1).
Figure 8Significance map 1 (x1).
Figure 3The impact of total wages of employed workers (x2).
Figure 9Significance map 2 (x2).
Figure 4The impact of total value of imported goods (x3).
Figure 10Significance map 3 (x3).
Figure 5The impact of total value of agricultural output (x4).
Figure 11Significance map 4 (x4).
Figure 6The impact of industrial value-added index (x5).
Figure 12Significance map 5 (x5).
Figure 7The impact of education input (x5).
Figure 13Significance map 6 (x6).
Results of general regression analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −21561.9 | 13305.3 | −1.62055 | 0.14915− |
| X1 | −3.97051 | 4.14586 | −0.957704 | 0.37011− |
| X2 | 13.1271 | 3.73844 | 3.51139 | 0.00984*** |
| X3 | 200.884 | 124.211 | 1.61727 | 0.14985− |
| X4 | 0.000315832 | 0.000531627 | 0.594085 | 0.57115− |
| X5 | −17.0679 | 5.29043 | −3.22618 | 0.01453** |
| X6 | 0.000452168 | 0.000144838 | 3.12188 | 0.01680** |
| R2 | 0.995747 | Mean dependent var | 2892.86 | |
| S.E. of regression | 238.42 | S.D dependent var | 2585.02 | |
| Sum squared resid | 397,910 | Akaike info criterion | 197.299 | |
| Log likelihood | −91.6496 | Schwarz criterion | 201.773 | |
Regression analysis under the condition of a spatial error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −9864.87 | 8738.91 | −1.12884 | 0.25896− |
| X1 | −12.6926 | 4.13371 | −3.07052 | 0.00214*** |
| X2 | 19.0856 | 3.96255 | 4.81648 | 0.00000*** |
| X3 | 87.5077 | 81.4873 | 1.07388 | 0.28288− |
| X4 | 0.000442024 | 0.000338078 | 1.30746 | 0.19106− |
| X5 | −6.98233 | 6.46173 | −1.08057 | 0.27989− |
| X6 | 0.000230957 | 0.000188423 | 1.22574 | 0.00000*** |
| R2 | 0.989472 | Mean dependent var | 2892.857143 | |
| S.E. of regression | 265.245 | S.D dependent var | 2585.01922 | |
| Sigma-square | 70354.8 | Akaike info criterion | 186.414 | |
| Log likelihood | −86.206758 | Schwarz criterion | 190.887 | |
Regression analysis with spatial lag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −19,326 | 8806.79 | −1.54529 | 0.02820** |
| X1 | −8.07057 | 3.83835 | −2.10261 | 0.03550** |
| X2 | 16.7747 | 3.44211 | 4.87339 | 0.00000*** |
| X3 | 182.772 | 81.9198 | 2.23111 | 0.02567** |
| X4 | 0.000515639 | 0.000368178 | 1.40052 | 0.16136− |
| X5 | −23.245 | 5.25555 | −4.42295 | 0.00001*** |
| X6 | 0.000482438 | 9.608e−005 | 5.02121 | 0.00000*** |
| R2 | 0.996392 | Mean dependent var | 2892.86 | |
| S.E. of regression | 155.271 | S.D dependent var | 2585.02 | |
| Sigma-square | 24109.2 | Akaike info criterion | 197.018 | |
| Log likelihood | −90.509 | Schwarz criterion | 202.13 | |
Panel data model for estimating regional GDP with no spatial effect.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0.983 | 0.987 | 0.986 | 0.990 | ||
| X1 | 3.430*** | 2.907*** | 2.826*** | 2.900*** | |
| X2 | 4.289*** | 4.391*** | 4.419*** | 4.412*** | |
| LogP | X3 | 0.041− | −1.007− | −1.677* | −0.667− |
| X4 | −0.501− | −1.670* | −0.573− | −2.013** | |
| X5 | −4.110*** | −2.875*** | −4.146*** | −2.463** | |
| X6 | 6.442*** | 3.580*** | 6.358*** | 2.883*** | |
| LM spatial lag test | 0.0002− | 0.0000− | 0.0000− | 0.0010− | |
| LM spatial error test | 12.3880*** | 11.6022*** | 7.5131*** | 3.3127* | |
| Robust LM spatial lag test | 1.7989− | 1.3267− | 0.9845− | 0.3606− | |
| Robust LM spatial error test | 14.1866*** | 12.9289*** | 8.4977*** | 3.6724* | |
GDP, gross domestic product; OLS, ordinary least squares.