| Literature DB >> 35350612 |
Zhichao Wang1,2, Fang Wu3, Qianbing Zhou4, Yumin Qiu1,2, Jianning Zhang1,2, Qiang Tu1,2, Zhe Zhou1,2, Yijia Shao3, Shiyue Xu1,2, Yan Wang3, Jun Tao1,2,3.
Abstract
Berberine (BBR) has been demonstrated to exert cardiovascular protective effects by regulating gut microbiota. However, few studies examine the effect of BBR on the gut microbiota in hypertension. This study aims to investigate the role of BBR in regulating microbial alterations and vascular function in hypertension. C57BL/6 J mice were infused with Ang II (0.8 mg/kg/day) via osmotic minipumps and treated with BBR (150 mg/kg/day) or choline (1%) for 4 weeks. Blood pressure was detected by tail-cuff measurement once a week. Abdominal aorta pulse wave velocity (PWV) and endothelium dependent vasodilatation were measured to evaluate vascular function. Vascular remodeling was assessed by histological staining of aortic tissue. The fecal microbiota was profiled using 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing. Plasma trimethylamine (TMA)/trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and hepatic FMO3 expression were measured. We found that BBR treatment significantly alleviated the elevated blood pressure, vascular dysfunction, and pathological remodeling in Ang II-induced hypertensive mice, while choline treatment aggravated hypertension-related vascular dysfunction. 16S rDNA gene sequencing results showed that BBR treatment altered gut microbiota composition (reduced the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio and increased the abundances of Lactobacillus). Moreover, BBR inhibited FMO3 expression and plasma TMA/TMAO production in hypertensive mice. TMAO treatment increased the apoptosis and oxidative stress of human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) and aggravated Ang II-induced HAECs dysfunction in vitro. These results indicate that the protective effect of BBR in hypertension might be attributed (at least partially) to the inhibition of TMAO production via regulating the gut microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: TMAO; angiotensin II; berberine; gut microbiota; hypertension; vascular dysfunction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35350612 PMCID: PMC8957906 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.814855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1BBR lowers blood pressure and attenuates impaired endothelium dependent vasodilation and elevated PWV in Ang II induced hypertensive mice. (A) Systolic blood pressure (SBP), (B) diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and endothelium dependent vasodilation (C) of mice from each group. (D) Representative images of abdominal aorta PWV by ultrasound in each group. (E) Quantitative analysis of PWV in each group. n = 5 for each group; *p < 0.05 vs. AngII group, #p < 0.05 vs. Choline+AngII group, $p < 0.05 vs. AngII group.
Figure 2BBR restores the thickness and elastic fiber of aorta in Ang II induced hypertensive mice. (A) HE, Masson, and EVG staining of Aortic tissue in each group. Quantitative analysis of media thickness (B) and elastic fiber lamina (C) of aorta from each group. n = 5 for each group; *p < 0.05.
Figure 3The effect of BBR on gut microbiota community composition. (A) Unweighted UniFrac-based PCoA plots illustrating differences in gut microbiota among groups (β-diversity). (B) Relative abundance of gut microbiota (phylum level) in each group. (C) Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio in each group. (D) Indicator analysis at genus and species level in each group. (E) Abundances of Lactobacillus in each group. n = 5 for each group; *p < 0.05.
Figure 4BBR Inhibited TMAO Synthesis in Ang II-Induced Hypertensive Mice. (A) Plasma TMA level of each group (n = 5). (B) Plasma TMAO level of each group (n = 5). (C) Western blotting detection of FMO3 expression in the liver. (D) Statistical analysis of hepatic FMO3 expression of each group (n = 4). (E) Linear correlation between TMAO level and PWV, media thickness of aorta, SBP and endothelium dependent vasodilation (n = 10). *p < 0.05.
Figure 5Apoptosis ratio, intracellular ROS and NO levels of HAECs induced by different concentrations of TMAO in vitro. (A) Representative images of apoptosis ratio. Quantitative analysis of apoptosis ratio (B), relative ROS levels (C) and relative NO levels (D). n = 5 for each group; *p < 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 6The in vitro function of HAECs treated with TMAO (500 μmol/L) and Ang II (2 μmol/L). (A) Representative images of in vitro function of HAECs (including transwell migration, wound healing and tube formation). (B) Quantitative analysis of in vitro function of HAECs. n = 5 for each group; *p < 0.05 vs. control group, #p < 0.05 vs. TMAO group, $p < 0.05 vs. AngII group.