| Literature DB >> 35350566 |
Kun Liu1, Xin Gao1, Baoqiang Kang1, Yunpeng Liu2, Dingding Wang3, Yi Wang1.
Abstract
Exosomes are lipid membrane bilayer-encapsulated vesicles secreted by cells into the extracellular space. They carry abundant inclusions (such as nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids) that play pivotal roles in intercellular communication. Tumor stem cells are capable of self-renewal and are crucial for survival, proliferation, drug resistance, metastasis, and recurrence of tumors. The miRNAs (microRNAs) in exosomes have various functions, such as participating in inflammatory response, cell migration, proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Tumor stem cells secrete exosomes that act as important messengers involved in various tumor processes and several studies provide increasing evidence supporting the importance of these exosomes in tumor recurrence and metastasis. This review primarily focuses on the production and secretion of exosomes from tumors and tumor stem cells and their effects on cancer progression. Cancer stem cancer derived exosome play an important massager in the tumor microenvironment. It also emphasizes on the study of tumor stem cell exosomes in the light of cancer metastasis and recurrence aiming to provide valuable insights and novel perspectives, which could be beneficial for developing effective diagnostic and treatment strategies.Entities:
Keywords: cancer stem cells; exosomes; metastasis; tumor; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35350566 PMCID: PMC8958025 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.836548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Summary of isolation methods for exosomes.
| Isolation methods | Advantages and disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Ultracentrifugation | Time consuming. Require specific equipment. Contamination by other Evs. Simple Cost-effective. |
| Sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation | Time-consuming, hard to access ultra- centrifugation equipment, change in osmotic environ- ment, co-isolating contaminants. Most studied and most commonly used, easy to handle with simple principle. |
| Immunoaffinity | Enables continuous mixing and isolation of EVs using immunomagnetic beads. EVs are enriched by immunomagnetic selection and retained as tight aggregates by magnetic force. The retained clusters could be subsequently probed with secondary markers for optical detection. Suitable for different EVs Allows positive and negative selection. Expensive. |
| Contact-free sorting of EVs | The device consists of a pair of interdigitated transducers to generate standing ultrasound wave to exert differential forces on vesicles of different sizes. During operation, vesicles in an acoustic region experience radiation pressure that is proportional to the vesicle size and move toward the pressure node. Larger vesicles move faster than smaller vesicles, thereby forming differential separation trajectories. By |
| Microfluidic filtering methods for EV isolation and sorting | The device consists of size-selective filters (<1 μm) and capillary guide and is assembled by a magnetic sandwich. A nanoscale lateral displacement array that sorts differentially sized vesicles through displacement trajectories. Due to the differential vesicle trajectories, larger vesicles would be displaced to the right channel (fully bumped) while small vesicles followed a zigzag path. When sorted in the device, fluorescent-labeled EVs confirmed the differential displacement trajectories. |
| Filtration | Easy. Inexpensive. Suitable for big volumes. Losses during the process. Deform particles. |
| Size-exclusion chromatography | Suitable for different EVs Inexpensive. Higher purity. Not suitable for big volumes Time-consuming. Require specific equipment. |
| Microfluidics technology | Good results with small amounts. Fast and simple. Expensive. |
| Commercial kits | Easy Simple. Expensive. Long incubation periods. Long incubation periods. |
Summary of exosome characterization techniques.
| Methods | Instrument | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Morphological | SEM | Provides three-dimensional surface information. |
| TEM | Superior image resolution and can be used with immunogold labeling to provide molecular characterization. | |
| cryo-EM | Enables analysis of EVs morphology without extensive processing. | |
| AFM | Provide information on both surface topology and local material properties. | |
| Size | NTA( Nanoparticle tracking analysis ) | Tracks individual vesicle scattering over time, as they diffuse and scatter under light illumination then it could determine vesicle concentration and size distribution. Analysis of size and concentration. Fast and easy. Low specificity for same size particles. |
| DLS | Measures bulk scattered light from EVs as the vesicles undergo continuous Brownian motion. The dynamic information on the vesicles is derived from an autocorrelation of the scattered intensity and could be used to determine vesicle size. As the original size distribution measured by DLS is intensity-weighted, the data is dominated by large vesicles. It is affected by the color, electrical, magnetic and other physical and chemical properties of the measured substance, and is very sensitive to dust and impurities. | |
| TRPS (Tunable resistive pulse sensing) | Two fluidic reservoirs, each connected to an electrode, are separated by a membrane with a pore. The ionic current between reservoirs is then measured. When a EV passes through the pore, it blocks the current flow, leading to a transient current decrease. | |
| SEA (Single EV analysis) | EVs are biotinylated and captured on a flat surface coated with neutravidin (Av). EVs are then stained with fluorescent antibodies and imaged. Subsequently, fluorophores are quenched, and the staining process is repeated for a different set of markers. | |
| SP-IRIS | The coherent light formed by the substrate and the particle is imaged, and the size of the nanoparticles is directly calculated by the brightness after imaging. Sp-iris technology has the advantages of high precision, high sensitivity and single exosome fluorescence imaging. | |
| Surface marker | Flow cytometry -Small particle flow cytometry | Highly sensitive flow cytometry instrument, termed vesicle flow cytometry. Fluorescent intensity from liposomes, labeled with di-8-ANEPPS, were calibrated for the vesicle diameter. Analysis of size, count and surface protein expression. Commonly found in facilities. Size limitation of conventional flow cytometers |
| Western blot | Conventional EV protein analysis. EV protein lysate is separated by SDS−PAGE, before being transferred over to a membrane for immunoblotting of specific EV protein targets (e.g., CD81, TSG101, CD9 and CD63). Analysis of protein components. Technique commonly performed in several laboratories. Time consuming processing. | |
| ELISA (Enzyme-linked immuno- sorbent assay) | In the specific “sandwich” configuration, vesicles or lysates could be applied to a solid support that has been pretreated with an immobilized capturing antibody. Captured vesicle targets are then exposed to a detecting target antibody. | |
| New Technologies for Analysis of EVs | Micronuclear magnetic resonance | (a) Assay schematics to maximize magnetic nanoparticle (NMP) binding onto EVs. A two-step bio- orthogonal click chemistry was used to label EVs with MNPs. (b) The microfluidic system for on-chip detection of circulating EVs is designed to detect MNP-targeted vesicles, concentrate MNP-tagged vesicles (while removing unbound MNPs), and provide in-line NMR detection. |
| Surface plasmon resonance | (a) The nPLEX sensing is based on transmission SPR through periodic nanohole arrays. The hole diameter is 200 nm with a periodicity of 450 nm. The structure was patterned in a gold film (200 nm thick) deposited on a glass substrate. (b) Finite-difference time- domain simulation shows the enhanced electromagnetic fields tightly confined near a periodic nanohole surface. The field distribution overlaps with the size of EVs captured onto the sensing surface, maximizing the detection sensitivity. (c) The sensing array can be integrated with multichannel microfluidics for independent and parallel analyses. (d) Assay schematic of changes in transmission spectra showing EV detection. The gold surface is prefunctionalized by a layer of polyethylene glycol (PEG), and antibody conjugation and specific EV binding were monitored by transmission spectral shifts as measured by sensor. (e) In comparison to gold standard methods, the nPLEX assay demonstrated excellent sensitivity, more sensitive than Western blotting and chemiluminescence ELISA, respectively. (f) Correlation between nPLEX and ELISA measurements. The marker protein expression level was determined by normalizing the marker signal with that of anti-CD63, which accounted for variation in exosomal counts across samples. | |
| Electrochemical detection | EVs are captured on magnetic beads directly in plasma and labeled with HRP enzyme for electrochemical detection. The magnetic beads are coated with antibodies against CD63(an enriched surface marker in exosomes). | |
| ExoScreen technology | This proximity assay requires two types of immunobeads: (1) donor beads, which are excited at 680 nm to release singlet oxygen, and (2) acceptor beads, which can be only excited by the released singlet oxygen when they are situated within 200 nm away from the donor beads. (b) Assay workflow. Biological samples are first treated with biotinylated antibodies and acceptor beads conjugated with a second antibody. Streptavidin-coated donor beads were then added to complete the proximity assay for data acquisition. (c) Correlation between ExoScreen measurements for CD9 positive EVs, CD63 positive EVs, or CD63/CD9 double-positive EVs and EV protein concentration in a dilution series. The addition of biotinylated antibodies and acceptor beads conjugated antibodies is denoted “bCD9/aCD9” or “bCD63/aCD63”. |
Cell interaction of exosome miRNA in cancers.
| miRNA | Donor cell | Recipient cell | Target gene | Disease | Function | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-25-3p | CRC | EC | KLF4 and KLF2 | CRC | metastatic | ( |
| miR-1247-3p | HCC | FIB | B4GALT3 | LUC | metastasis | ( |
| miR-423-5p | GC patients’ serum | GC | SUFU | GC | proliferation and migration | ( |
| miR141 | lung cancer patients’ serum | LUC cell and EC | GAX | LUC | angiogenesis and malignant | ( |
| miR103 | HCC | EC | VE-Cad, p120 and ZO1 | HCC | migration | ( |
| miR-1246 | BC | HMLE | CCNG2 | BC | migration and chemoresistance | ( |
| miR-19b-3p | CCRCC CSC | CCRCC | PTEN | LUC | EMT | ( |
| miR-210-3p | LUC CSC | LUC | FGFRL1 | LUC | metastatic | ( |
| miR21, miR-100-5p, miR-21-5p and miR-139-5p | Pca cells and CSCs | FIB | MMPs -2, -9 and -13 and RANKL | PCa | metastatic | ( |
| miR155 | PDAC cells resistance gemcitabine | PDAC | TP53INP1 | PDAC | chemoresistance | ( |
FIB, fibroblasts; EC, endothelial; CRC, colorectal cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CCRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; CSCs, cancer stem cells; GAX, homeobox gene; GC, gastric cancer; FGFRL1, fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1; Pca, prostate cancer; VE-Cad, VE-Cadherin; p120, p120-catenin; ZO1, zonula occludens 1; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; MMPs, metalloproteinases; BC, breast cancer; CCNG2, Cyclin-G2; LUC, lung cancer.
Figure 1Cancer cells especially cancer stem cells(CSCs)-derived exosome-mediated EMT during cancer progression. In tumor cells, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and transcription factors (EMT-TFs), especially tumor-derived exosomes, assign stem cell (SC) characteristics to dedifferentiated tumor cells that are called cancer stem cells (CSCs). The dissemination of tumor cells in the primary tumor and migration after the breakdown of the basement membrane (BM) can be achieved That cells initiates invasion when integrated necessary genetic aberrations and simulated by regarding signals from exosome origins at the tumor. Based on this, providing signals and maintaining the mesenchymal state of metastatic cells may be a positive contribution of EMT.EMT features may promote resistance in the period of anti-tumor therapy, leading to recurrence and poor prognosis. The imbalance between relevant regulatory networks and activated oncogenic approaches at different cancer stages may determine the extent of EMT. In particular CSC in tumor cells-secreted exosomes play an important role as messengers in the dynamic transition between EMT and MET in tumor cells. Cancer cells can activate transfer between EMT and MET while cancer cell invasion.
Figure 2Exosome play an important role in tumor invasion–metastasis cascade. This depiction of the invasion–metastasis cascade ascribes distinct steps to the overall process. The initial step in local invasion is for the in situ cancer cells to break through the basement membrane. They may then infiltrate into the lymphatic vessels or microvasculature. The latter may then transport these cancer cells through the systemic circulation to distant anatomic sites, where they may become trapped and subsequently exude, forming dormant micrometastases. Some micrometastases may eventually acquire the ability to colonize the tissue in which they land, allowing them to form macroscopic metastases. The final step - colonization - appears to be the least efficient of all. The little of successfully completing all steps of this cascade process explains why the likelihood of any individual cancer cell leaving the primary tumor and becoming the founder of a distant macroscopic metastasis is low. More suggestions proposed an alternative description involving two main stages: the first enables the physical dissemination of cancer cells from the core of the primary tumor to the parenchyma of a distant tissue, while the second—colonization—depends on the adaptation of disseminated cancer cells to the microenvironment of this tissue. Exosomes as an essential part taking into the messages during the whole process.