| Literature DB >> 35350101 |
Canxiao Li1, Han Zhang1, Shijie Li1, Daqi Zhang1, Jingting Li1, Gianlorenzo Dionigi2, Nan Liang1, Hui Sun1.
Abstract
Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW) have been used as prognostic biomarkers in various cancers. We aim to investigate the relationship between the above inflammatory indices, clinicopathological features, and postoperative calcitonin (Ctn) progression in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; calcitonin; clinicopathological characteristics; inflammation-based score; medullary thyroid carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35350101 PMCID: PMC8957807 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.861869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Flow diagram of the patients included in the current study.
Baseline clinicopathological characteristics of MTC patients.
| Features | N (%) | Features | N (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | Yes | 3 (4.4%) | |
| Female | 38 (59.1%) | euthyroid | 57 (83.8%) |
| Male | 30 (44.1%) | hypothyroid | 2 (2.9%) |
| 48.3 ± 11.3 | hyperthyroid | 0 (0%) | |
| 1.2 (0.6-2.2) | subclinical hypothyroid | 7 (10.3%) | |
| subclinical hyperthyroid | 2 (2.9%) | ||
| No | 57 (83.2%) | ||
| Yes | 11 (16.2%) | Lobectomy thyroidectomy+ CND | 6 (8.8%) |
| Lobectomy thyroidectomy+ CND+ Ipsilateral LND | 2 (2.9%) | ||
| No | 60 (88.2%) | Subtotal thyroidectomy+ CND | 4 (5.9%) |
| Yes | 8 (11.8%) | Subtotal thyroidectomy+ CND+ Ipsilateral LND | 9 (13.2%) |
| Total thyroidectomy+ CND | 10 (14.7%) | ||
| T1+T2 | 62 (91.2%) | Total thyroidectomy+ CND+ Ipsilateral LND | 28 (41.2%) |
| T3+T4 | 6 (8.8%) | Total thyroidectomy+ CND+ Bilateral LND | 9 (13.2%) |
| N0 | 34 (50.0%) | Remission | 39 (57.4%) |
| N1a | 7 (10.3%) | Stable | 8 (11.8%) |
| N1b | 27 (39.7%) | Progress | 21 (30.9%) |
| I+II | 34 (50%) | LMR | 5.2 ± 1.7 |
| III+IV | 34 (50%) | NLR | 1.7 ± 0.6 |
| PLR | 115.1 ± 31.2 | ||
| NO | 63 (92.6%) | MPV | 9 (8.1-10.0) |
| YES | 5 (7.4%) | PDW | 16.1 (15.5-16.5) |
| 72.0 ± 32.4 | |||
| No | 65 (95.6%) |
CND, central neck dissection; LND, lateral neck dissection; LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; MPV, average platelet volume; PDW, platelet distribution width.
Figure 2ROC curves for the preoperative LMR, PLR, NLR, MPV and PDW to predict (A) Capsule invasion, (B) LN metastasis, (C) central LN metastasis, (D) lateral LN metastasis, (E) calcitonin progression, and (F) recurrence in MTC patients. * Statistically significant P-values (P < 0.05). LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; MPV, average platelet volume; PDW, platelet distribution width; LN, lymph node; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma.
Area under the ROC curve.
| Features | AUC | 95%Cl | Cut-off | sensitivity | specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMR | 0.749 | 0.540-0.958 | 0.065 | / | / | / |
| PLR | 0.771 | 0.546-0.996 | 0.045 | 138.3 | 0.800 | 0.857 |
| NLR | 0.562 | 0.307-0.816 | 0.647 | / | / | / |
| MPV | 0.914 | 0.833-0.996 | 0.002 | 10.0 | 1.000 | 0.810 |
| PDW | 0.857 | 0.726-0.988 | 0.008 | 14.5 | 0.800 | 0.857 |
| LMR | 0.523 | 0.385-0.661 | 0.745 | / | / | / |
| PLR | 0.433 | 0.295-0.571 | 0.342 | / | / | / |
| NLR | 0.423 | 0.285-0.562 | 0.278 | / | / | / |
| MPV | 0.535 | 0.396-0.675 | 0.615 | / | / | / |
| PDW | 0.629 | 0.495-0.763 | 0.067 | / | / | / |
| LMR | 0.506 | 0.324-0.688 | 0.96 | / | / | / |
| PLR | 0.616 | 0.425-0.807 | 0.318 | / | / | / |
| NLR | 0.527 | 0.333-0.721 | 0.816 | / | / | / |
| MPV | 0.452 | 0.198-0.706 | 0.679 | / | / | / |
| PDW | 0.527 | 0.319-0.735 | 0.816 | / | / | / |
| LMR | 0.526 | 0.382-0.671 | 0.716 | / | / | / |
| PLR | 0.475 | 0.329-0.620 | 0.726 | / | / | / |
| NLR | 0.430 | 0.290-0.570 | 0.334 | / | / | / |
| MPV | 0.519 | 0.374-0.663 | 0.797 | / | / | / |
| PDW | 0.645 | 0.516-0.775 | 0.044 | 16.4 | 0.926 | 0.390 |
| LMR | 0.657 | 0.513-0.801 | 0.040 | 4.7 | 0.619 | 0.660 |
| PLR | 0.511 | 0.357-0.664 | 0.889 | / | / | / |
| NLR | 0.474 | 0.328-0.620 | 0.735 | / | / | / |
| MPV | 0.728 | 0.574-0.881 | 0.003 | 8.2 | 0.619 | 0.851 |
| PDW | 0.528 | 0.389-0.668 | 0.710 | / | / | / |
| LMR | 0.598 | 0.402-0.795 | 0.466 | / | / | / |
| PLR | 0.667 | 0.467-0.866 | 0.217 | / | / | / |
| NLR | 0.597 | 0.440-0.754 | 0.474 | / | / | / |
| MPV | 0.568 | 0.205-0.931 | 0.613 | / | / | / |
| PDW | 0.589 | 0.370-0.808 | 0.511 | / | / | / |
LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; MPV, average platelet volume; PDW, platelet distribution width.
For P ≤0.05, cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity are not shown.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors for lateral LN metastasis.
| Features | Non-N1b | N1b | Univariate | Multivariate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95%CI) | |||||
| 0.421 | |||||
| ≤55 | 18 | 31 | |||
| >55 | 9 | 10 | |||
| 0.649 | |||||
| female | 16 | 22 | |||
| male | 11 | 19 | |||
| 0.011 | |||||
| No | 20 | 40 | |||
| Yes | 7 | 1 | |||
| 0.035 | |||||
| No | 19 | 38 | |||
| Yes | 8 | 3 | |||
| >0.05 | |||||
| No | 25 | 38 | |||
| Yes | 2 | 3 | |||
| 0.003 | |||||
| ≤1 | 6 | 24 | 1 | ||
| >1 | 21 | 17 | 4.833 (1.514-15.427) | 0.008 | |
| 0.018 | |||||
| PDW ≤ 16.4 | 2 | 13 | 7.8 (1.532-39.720) | 0.013 | |
| PDW>16.4 | 25 | 28 | 1 | ||
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors for calcitonin progression.
| Features | Non-progressive group | Progressive group | Univariate | Multivariate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | |||||
| 0.938 | |||||
| ≤55 | 34 | 15 | |||
| >55 | 13 | 6 | |||
| 0.359 | |||||
| female | 28 | 10 | |||
| male | 19 | 11 | |||
| 0.024 | |||||
| ≤1 | 25 | 5 | |||
| >1 | 22 | 16 | |||
| 0.981 | |||||
| No | 42 | 18 | |||
| Yes | 5 | 3 | |||
| 0.942 | |||||
| No | 40 | 17 | |||
| Yes | 7 | 4 | |||
| 0.294 | |||||
| No | 42 | 21 | |||
| Yes | 5 | 0 | |||
| 1 | |||||
| No | 45 | 20 | |||
| Yes | 2 | 1 | |||
| 0.336 | |||||
| I+II | 45 | 18 | |||
| III+IV | 2 | 3 | |||
| 0.001 | |||||
| N0 | 30 | 14 | 1 | ||
| N1 | 17 | 17 | 45.890(3.879-542.936) | 0.002 | |
| 0.049 | |||||
| N0+N1a | 32 | 9 | |||
| N1b | 15 | 12 | |||
| 0.001 | |||||
| I+II | 30 | 4 | |||
| III+IV | 17 | 17 | |||
| <0.01 | |||||
| >8.2 | 10 | 14 | 1 | ||
| ≤8.2 | 37 | 7 | 13.999(2.842-68.965) | 0.001 | |
| 13/8 | 16/31 | 0.032 | |||
| >4.7 | 16 | 13 | 1 | ||
| ≤4.7 | 31 | 8 | 4.790(1.034-22.187) | 0.045 | |
Figure 3ROC curves for the combination of preoperative MPV and LMR to predict calcitonin progression. LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; MPV, mean platelet volume. MPV-LMR, MPV ≤8.2 or LMR ≤4.7; MPV+LMR, MPV ≤8.2 and LMR ≤4.7.
Area under the ROC curve.
| AUC | 95%Cl | Cut-off | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPV | 0.728 | 0.574-0.881 | 0.003 | 8.2 | 0.619 | 0.851 |
| LMR | 0.657 | 0.513-0.801 | 0.040 | 4.7 | 0.619 | 0.660 |
| MPV-LMR | 0.649 | 0.512-0.786 | 0.050 | 0.5 | 0.810 | 0.489 |
| MPV | 0.717 | 0.570-0.864 | 0.050 | 0.5 | 0.476 | 0.957 |
MPV-LMR, MPV ≤ 8.2 or LMR ≤ 4.7; MPV+LMR, MPV ≤ 8.2 and LMR ≤ 4.7.
LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; MPV, mean platelet volume.