Literature DB >> 3535004

Double-blind crossover study of ranitidine and placebo in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

K E Johansson, B Boeryd, K Johansson, L Tibbling.   

Abstract

The effect of 150 mg ranitidine twice daily was compared with placebo by the double-blind crossover technique (8 weeks twice) in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux (paired comparison in 38 patients). Ranitidine was superior to placebo with regard to effect on symptoms, improvement of oesophagitis as assessed by endoscopy and biopsy, and decrease of oesophageal acid hypersensitivity. The symptomatic response to ranitidine was, however, unsatisfactory in more than half of the cases. When symptomatic responders taking ranitidine (R) were compared with non-responders (NR), there was no difference with regard to the severity of oesophagitis or frequency of positive acid perfusion tests before or after the 8-week treatment. NR were younger and more often had endoscopic signs of incompetence of the cardia and gastric prolapse. Ranitidine is an efficient drug in patients with reflux disease. It cannot be expected that mechanical problems in the hiatal region will be influenced by ranitidine, which is probably why half the patients did not respond.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3535004     DOI: 10.3109/00365528609011116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine in treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with gastric acid hypersecretion.

Authors:  M J Collen; R M Strong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  A E Davies; B K Sandhu
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.

Authors:  N Sharma; C Donnellan; C Preston; B Delaney; G Duckett; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases.

Authors:  S M Grant; H D Langtry; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Double-blind comparison of cisapride and cimetidine in treatment of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  J P Galmiche; B Fraitag; B Filoche; M Evreux; J Vitaux; P Zeitoun; J Fournet; J C Soule
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  A proposition for the diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a report from a working group on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric Gastro-enterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN).

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; A Ashkenazi; D Belli; N Boige; J Bouquet; S Cadranel; J P Cezard; S Cucchiara; C Dupont; K Geboes
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  Role of gastric acid suppression in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  N J Bell; R H Hunt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, and mucosal acid sensitivity are three separate, though related, aspects of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  P J Howard; L Maher; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E C Klinkenberg-Knol; H P Festen; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Asia : birth of a 'new' disease?

Authors:  Ting K Cheung; Benjamin C Y Wong; Shiu K Lam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.