Literature DB >> 35348872

Risk prediction models incorporating institutional case volume for mortality after hip fracture surgery in the elderly.

Seokha Yoo1, Eun Jin Jang2, Junwoo Jo3, Hannah Lee1, Yoonbin Hwang1, Ho Geol Ryu4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While higher institutional case volume is associated with better postoperative outcomes in various types of surgery, institutional case volume has been rarely included in risk prediction models for surgical patients. This study aimed to develop and validate the predictive models incorporating institutional case volume for predicting in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery in the elderly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for all patients (≥ 60 years) who underwent surgery for femur neck fracture, pertrochanteric fracture, or subtrochanteric fracture between January 2008 and December 2016 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Patients were randomly assigned into the derivation cohort or the validation cohort in a 1:1 ratio. Risk prediction models for in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality were developed in the derivation cohort using the logistic regression model. Covariates included age, sex, type of fracture, type of anaesthesia, transfusion, and comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, and dementia. Two separate models, one with and the other without institutional case volume as a covariate, were constructed, evaluated, and compared using the likelihood ratio test. Based on the models, scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality were developed.
RESULTS: Analysis of 196,842 patients showed 3.6% in-hospital mortality (7084/196,842) and 15.42% 1-year mortality (30,345/196,842). The model for predicting in-hospital mortality incorporating the institutional case volume demonstrated better discrimination (c-statistics 0.692) compared to the model without the institutional case volume (c-statistics 0.688; likelihood ratio test p value < 0.001). The performance of the model for predicting 1-year mortality was also better when incorporating institutional case volume (c-statistics 0.675 vs. 0.674; likelihood ratio test p value < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The new institutional case volume incorporated scoring system may help to predict in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery in the elderly population.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case volume; Elderly; Hip fracture; Mortality

Year:  2022        PMID: 35348872     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04426-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  27 in total

1.  Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.

Authors:  Johan L Dikken; Anneriet E Dassen; Valery E P Lemmens; Hein Putter; Pieta Krijnen; Lydia van der Geest; Koop Bosscha; Marcel Verheij; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Michel W J M Wouters
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Effect of Hospital Volume on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Masaharu Ishida; Takeshi Naitoh; Yu Katayose; Shinichi Egawa; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Hospital Characteristics, Inpatient Processes of Care, and Readmissions of Older Adults with Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Nabil M Elkassabany; Molly Passarella; Samir Mehta; Jiabin Liu; Mark D Neuman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications of Pneumonia After Surgery for Geriatric Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Daniel D Bohl; Robert A Sershon; Bryan M Saltzman; Brian Darrith; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Jay Magaziner; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Dirk Vanderschueren; Koen Milisen; Brigitte Velkeniers; Steven Boonen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fangke Hu; Chengying Jiang; Jing Shen; Peifu Tang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  Hong X Jiang; Sumit R Majumdar; Donald A Dick; Marc Moreau; James Raso; David D Otto; D William C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) to predict the postoperative risk for hip fracture in elder patients.

Authors:  J Hirose; H Mizuta; J Ide; K Nomura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States.

Authors:  Carmen A Brauer; Marcelo Coca-Perraillon; David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Myocardial infarction after hip fracture repair: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jeanne M Huddleston; Rachel E Gullerud; Fantley Smither; Paul M Huddleston; Dirk R Larson; Michael P Phy; L Joseph Melton; Veronique L Roger
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.