Literature DB >> 35348718

Developing an algorithm across integrated healthcare systems to identify a history of cancer using electronic medical records.

Jennifer C Gander1, Mahesh Maiyani2, Larissa L White2, Andrew T Sterrett2, Brianna Güney1, Pamala A Pawloski3, Teri DeFor3, YuanYuan Olsen3, Benjamin A Rybicki4, Christine Neslund-Dudas4, Darsheen Sheth4, Richard Krajenta4, Devaki Purushothaman4, Stacey Honda5,6, Cyndee Yonehara5, Katrina A B Goddard7, Yolanda K Prado7, Habibul Ahsan8, Muhammad G Kibriya8, Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy8, Chun-Hung Chan9, Sarah Hague9, Christina L Clarke2, Brooke Thompson2, Jennifer Sawyer2, Mia M Gaudet10, Heather Spencer Feigelson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tumor registries in integrated healthcare systems (IHCS) have high precision for identifying incident cancer but often miss recently diagnosed cancers or those diagnosed outside of the IHCS. We developed an algorithm using the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify people with a history of cancer not captured in the tumor registry to identify adults, aged 40-65 years, with no history of cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The algorithm was developed at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, and then applied to 7 other IHCS. We included tumor registry data, diagnosis and procedure codes, chemotherapy files, oncology encounters, and revenue data to develop the algorithm. Each IHCS adapted the algorithm to their EMR data and calculated sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the algorithm's performance after iterative chart review.
RESULTS: We included data from over 1.26 million eligible people across 8 IHCS; 55 601 (4.4%) were in a tumor registry, and 44848 (3.5%) had a reported cancer not captured in a registry. The common attributes of the final algorithm at each site were diagnosis and procedure codes. The sensitivity of the algorithm at each IHCS was 90.65%-100%, and the specificity was 87.91%-100%. DISCUSSION: Relying only on tumor registry data would miss nearly half of the identified cancers. Our algorithm was robust and required only minor modifications to adapt to other EMR systems.
CONCLUSION: This algorithm can identify cancer cases regardless of when the diagnosis occurred and may be useful for a variety of research applications or quality improvement projects around cancer care.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithm; cancer; electronic health records

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35348718      PMCID: PMC9196704          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   7.942


  19 in total

1.  SMOKING IN RELATION TO MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY. FINDINGS IN FIRST THIRTY-FOUR MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY STARTED IN 1959.

Authors:  E C HAMMOND
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Validation of electronic data on chemotherapy and hormone therapy use in HMOs.

Authors:  Debra P Ritzwoller; Nikki Carroll; Thomas Delate; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rossetti; Paul A Fishman; Elizabeth T Loggers; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Mark C Hornbrook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer in men: the Physicians' Health Study II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Michael Gaziano; Howard D Sesso; William G Christen; Vadim Bubes; Joanne P Smith; Jean MacFadyen; Miriam Schvartz; JoAnn E Manson; Robert J Glynn; Julie E Buring
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the American Cancer Society prospective studies.

Authors:  L Garfinkel
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1985-05

5.  Building a virtual cancer research organization.

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Gene Hart; Jennifer L Ellis; Donald J Bachman; Gary Ansell; Sarah M Greene; Edward H Wagner; Roy Pardee; Mark M Schmidt; Ann Geiger; Amy L Butani; Terry Field; Hassan Fouayzi; Irina Miroshnik; Liyan Liu; Robert Diseker; Karen Wells; Rick Krajenta; Lois Lamerato; Christine Neslund Dudas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

6.  Precision Prevention and Early Detection of Cancer: Fundamental Principles.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Karen Burns-White; Andrew T Chan; Karen Emmons; Matthew Freedman; David J Hunter; Peter Kraft; Francine Laden; Lorelei Mucci; Giovanni Parmigiani; Deborah Schrag; Sapna Syngal; Rulla M Tamimi; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Matthew B Yurgelun; Judy E Garber
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Epidemiology of breast cancer. Findings from the nurses' health study.

Authors:  G A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The AGRIculture and CANcer (AGRICAN) cohort study: enrollment and causes of death for the 2005-2009 period.

Authors:  Noémie Levêque-Morlais; Séverine Tual; Bénédicte Clin; Annie Adjemian; Isabelle Baldi; Pierre Lebailly
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: A Public Data Model to Support Collaboration.

Authors:  Tyler R Ross; Daniel Ng; Jeffrey S Brown; Roy Pardee; Mark C Hornbrook; Gene Hart; John F Steiner
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-03-24

10.  Developing an Algorithm to Identify History of Cancer Using Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Christina L Clarke; Heather S Feigelson
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.