| Literature DB >> 35348468 |
Hiroki Tanaka1, Satoshi Nakamura2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social skills training by human trainers is a well-established method to provide appropriate social interaction skills and strengthen social self-efficacy. In our previous work, we attempted to automate social skills training by developing a virtual agent that taught social skills through interaction. Previous research has not investigated the visual design of virtual agents for social skills training. Thus, we investigated the effect of virtual agent visual design on automated social skills training.Entities:
Keywords: acceptability; chatbot; crowdsourcing; design; realism; simulation; social interaction; social skill; social skills training; training; virtual agent; virtual agent design; virtual assistant; virtual trainer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35348468 PMCID: PMC9006137 DOI: 10.2196/35358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Hum Factors ISSN: 2292-9495
Figure 1Images of the 9 virtual characters and representative measures collected from data set 1 and data set 2.
Figure 2Screen captures of videos of two of the virtual characters (A) and representative measures collected from data set 3 (B, C).
Figure 3Screen captures of the 6 virtual agents (A); acceptability as a trainer in data set 4 (error bars represent SE) (B); and the evaluation of likeability by high and low SRS score groups (C).
Figure 4Correlation matrix of measures.
Relationship between questionnaire items and gender, age, and SRS score.
| User characteristic | Questionnaire item | Trend | ||
|
| ||||
|
| Character G | Face | 0.29 (<.001) | Male > female |
|
| Character G | Likeability | 0.25 (<.001) | Male > female |
|
| Character G | Trainer | 0.25 (<.001) | Male > female |
|
| ||||
|
| Character I | Eyes | 0.21 (<.001) | High > low |
|
| Character I | Face | 0.19 (<.001) | High > low |
|
| Character A | Listener | 0.17 (.003) | High < low |
|
| ||||
|
| Character G | Eyes | 0.19 (.001) | High > low |
|
| Character G | Hair | 0.18 (.002) | High > low |
|
| Character G | Face | 0.16 (.009) | High > low |
Figure 5Realism measures collected from data set 4. Error bars represent SE.