Literature DB >> 35348084

Caudal Epidural Injections in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Comparison of Nonimage, Ultrasonography-, and Fluoroscopy-Guided Techniques. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Frideriki Poutoglidou1, Dimitrios Metaxiotis1, Angelo V Vasiliadis1, Dimitrios Alvanos1, Anastasios Mpeletsiotis1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Caudal epidural injections (CEIs) are widely used in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Imaging modalities, such as fluoroscopy and ultrasonography, are frequently employed to confirm proper needle placement and to prevent possible complications. This is a prospective, randomized, study aiming to compare the efficacy of nonimage, ultrasonography-, and fluoroscopy-guided CEIs for the management of LSS.
METHODS: A total of 45 patients were included based on their clinical symptoms and their magnetic resonance images indicative of LSS. Patients were randomized and allocated into 3 equal groups, the nonimage, the ultrasonography-guided, and the fluoroscopy-guided group. All patients received 12 mg betamethasone and 4 mg ropivacaine dissolved in 20 mL normal saline. The injections were administered twice, with a 30-day interval. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index were recorded before the injections and 1 month after the second injection. The procedure times for each group were also compared.
RESULTS: Visual Analogue Scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index values were improved in all the groups compared to the baseline values (p < 0.001). The intergroup difference in Visual Analogue Scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index values before and after CEIs was not statistically significant (p = 0.836 and p = 0.438, respectively). The mean procedure time was higher for the fluoroscopy-guided group, followed by ultrasonography-guided, but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.067).
CONCLUSION: CEIs are an effective analgesic method for patients suffering from LSS. Nonimage, ultrasonography-, and fluoroscopy-guided CEIs are similarly effective in terms of pain relief and functional improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35348084      PMCID: PMC8784067          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/20.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  21 in total

1.  Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?

Authors:  A M Kelly
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 2.  Surgical and nonsurgical treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-25

3.  Clinical classification criteria for neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis. The N-CLASS criteria.

Authors:  Stéphane Genevay; Delphine S Courvoisier; Kika Konstantinou; Francisco M Kovacs; Marc Marty; James Rainville; Michael Norberg; Jean-François Kaux; Thomas D Cha; Jeffrey N Katz; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections.

Authors:  Kenneth P Botwin; Santhosh Thomas; Robert D Gruber; Francisco M Torres; Constantine C Bouchlas; Joshua J Rittenberg; Sanjiv Rao
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  Fluoroscopically Guided Epidural Injections of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Euddeum Shim; Joon Woo Lee; Eugene Lee; Joong Mo Ahn; Yusuhn Kang; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Determine the Effectiveness of Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection in Lumbosacral Sciatica.

Authors:  Jaydeep Nandi; Abhishek Chowdhery
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations.

Authors:  M A Ciol; R A Deyo; E Howell; S Kreif
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Kavita Manchikanti; Mark Boswell; Vidyasagar Pampati; Joshua Hirsch
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01

Review 9.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Eugene Carragee; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiculopathy: A randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Arindam Kumar Hazra; Dipasri Bhattacharya; Sayantan Mukherjee; Santanu Ghosh; Manasij Mitra; Mohanchandra Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.