Literature DB >> 35348083

Comanagement of Rashes by Primary Care Providers and Dermatologists: A Retrospective Study.

Sangeeta Marwaha1, Jennifer R Dusendang2, Stacey E Alexeeff2, Eileen Crowley3, Michael Haiman4, Ngoc Pham5, Melanie J Tuerk6, Danny Wudka7, Michael Hartmann7, Lisa J Herrinton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a high demand for managing skin disease, and dermatologists are in short supply.
OBJECTIVES: To better understand how rashes and other specific skin conditions are co-managed by primary care providers (PCPs) and dermatologists, we estimated the frequency with which PCPs sought consultation with or referral to dermatology and the proportion of patients who had a follow-up dermatology office visit in the following 90 days. DESIGN AND
SETTING: The retrospective longitudinal study included 106,459 patients with a skin condition diagnosed by 3,830 PCPs, from January 2017 to March 2017.
METHODS: Comprehensive electronic medical record data with generalized linear mixed modeling accounted for patient factors including diagnosis and clustering by medical center and PCP.
RESULTS: PCPs escalated 9% of patients to dermatology through consultation or referral, while 5% required a follow-up dermatology office visit within 90 days. Patients with bullous, hair, or pigment conditions or psoriasis were most likely to be escalated. Clustering of escalation and follow-up visits was minimal in relation to medical center (intraclass correlation, 0.04 for both outcomes) or PCP (escalation, intraclass correlation, 0.16; follow-up visits, 0.09). DISCUSSION: Improving primary care education in skin disease and, for certain skin conditions, standardizing approaches to workup, treatment, and escalation may further streamline care and reduce pressure on the dermatologist workforce.
CONCLUSION: PCPs managed 91% of rashes without consultation or referral to dermatology, and the frequency of patients scheduled for dermatology office visits after primary care was similar from one PCP to another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35348083      PMCID: PMC8784066          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/20.320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  18 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness study of face-to-face and teledermatology workflows for diagnosing skin cancer.

Authors:  Sangeeta S Marwaha; Helene Fevrier; Stacey Alexeeff; Eileen Crowley; Michael Haiman; Ngoc Pham; Melanie J Tuerk; Danny Wukda; Michael Hartmann; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Electronic consultation impact from the primary care clinician perspective: Outcomes from a national sample.

Authors:  J Nwando Olayiwola; Anna Potapov; Alden Gordon; Jaime Jurado; Candy Magana; Margae Knox; Delphine Tuot
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  Cost Minimization Analysis of a Teledermatology Triage System in a Managed Care Setting.

Authors:  Adam Zakaria; Theodore A Miclau; Toby Maurer; Kieron S Leslie; Erin Amerson
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care store-and-forward teledermatology consultation workflow built within an existing electronic health record system.

Authors:  Grace E Kim; Olga K Afanasiev; Chris O'Dell; Christopher Sharp; Justin M Ko
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  Association of teledermatology workflows with standardising co-management of rashes by primary care physicians and dermatologists.

Authors:  Jennifer R Dusendang; Sangeeta Marwaha; Stacey E Alexeeff; Eileen Crowley; Michael Haiman; Ngoc Pham; Melanie J Tuerk; Danny Wudka; Michael Hartmann; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 6.184

6.  Presentation of Rash in a Community-Based Health System.

Authors:  Jennifer R Dusendang; Sangeeta Marwaha; Stacey E Alexeeff; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-11

7.  Benefits of Teledermatology for Geriatric Patients: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mara G Bianchi; Andre Santos; Eduardo Cordioli
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care.

Authors:  Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Ana Rita J Maria; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Gemma Villanueva; Marita S Fønhus; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Nicholas Henschke; Brian S Buckley; Garrett L Mehl; Tigest Tamrat; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18

9.  Improving cooperation between general practitioners and dermatologists via telemedicine: study protocol of the cluster-randomized controlled TeleDerm study.

Authors:  Roland Koch; Andreas Polanc; Hannah Haumann; Gudula Kirtschig; Peter Martus; Christian Thies; Leonie Sundmacher; Carmen Gaa; Leonard Witkamp; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Teledermatology in Norway using a mobile phone app.

Authors:  Syed Mohammad Husain Rizvi; Thomas Schopf; Amandip Sangha; Kim Ulvin; Petter Gjersvik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.