| Literature DB >> 35347670 |
Mohamed I A Ibrahim1, Mohamed S Amer1, Hassan A H Ibrahim1, Eman H Zaghloul2.
Abstract
In the current study, a significant amount of ulvan was extracted from Ulva lactuca collected from Alexandria coastline, Egypt, using a simple extraction method. According to the chemical analysis, the obtained polysaccharide content is estimated to be 36.50 g/100 g with a high sulfate content of 19.72%. Physio-chemically, the FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of sulfated groups attached to the carbohydrate backbone. The GC-MS results revealed the presence of various monosaccharides with relative abundances in the order: fucopyranose (22.09%) > L-rhamnose (18.17%) > L-fucose (17.46%) > rhamnopyranose (14.29%) > mannopyranose (8.59%) > α-D-glactopyranose (7.64%) > galactopyranose (6.14%) > β-arabinopyranose (5.62%). In addition, the SEM-EDX depicted an amorphous architecture with a majority wt% for the elements of C, O, and S. The partially purified ulvan demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity against some fish and human pathogenic microbes. The inhibition zone diameter ranged from 11 to 18 mm. On the other hand, the prepared ulvan-chitosan hydrogel significantly improved the antimicrobial activity as the inhibition zone diameter ranged from 12 to 20. Moreover, when compared to the controls, the extracted ulvan demonstrated anti-fouling properties and successfully disrupted the biofilm formed on a glass slide submerged in seawater.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-fouling; Antimicrobial activity; Sulfated polysaccharide; Ulva lactuca; Ulvan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35347670 PMCID: PMC9205838 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-022-03867-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Biochem Biotechnol ISSN: 0273-2289 Impact factor: 3.094
Fig. 1Sites of algal sample collection for ulvan extraction
Proximate chemical analysis of both ulvan crude and the extracted sulfated polysaccharide from U. lactuca
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| (%) | |
| Crude ulvan | |
| Moisture | 13.98 |
| Ash | 39.29 |
| Fibers | 3.22 |
| Carbohydrates | 24.27 |
| Proteins | 9.67 |
| Total lipids | 9.57 |
| Extracted ulvan (partially purified) | |
| Carbohydrates as glucose | 43.61 |
| Sulfated polysaccharides | 36.5 |
| Sulfate | 19.72 |
Fig. 2FTIR spectrum of the partial purified ulvan from U. lactuca
Fig. 31H NMR spectra of the extracted ulvan from U. lactuca
Fig. 4GC chromatogram representing the relative sugar compositions (%) for the partial purified ulvan from U. lactuca
Fig. 5SEM micrographs of the extracted ulvan from U. lactuca
Fig. 6SEM–EDX data of the extracted ulvan from U. lactuca
Average mass values (%) for the elemental analysis of the ulvan polysaccharide from U. lactuca
| Element | *Mass (%) |
|---|---|
| C | 26.92 ± 0.30 |
| O | 48.87 ± 0.51 |
| N | 1.48 ± 0.21 |
| S | 9.11 ± 0.13 |
| Na | 6.18 ± 0.15 |
| K | 3.30 ± 0.10 |
| Mg | 2.09 ± 0.08 |
| Ca | 2.00 ± 0.08 |
| Fe | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
*Mean values of three replicate readings for the ulvan polysaccharide from U. lactuca
Fig. 7Deconvoluted Gaussian bands for the SEC chromatogram of the ulvan from U. lactuca
Antimicrobial activity, and MICs, of extracted ulvan and prepared ulvan-chitosan hydrogel against different indicator pathogens
| Pathogen | Inhibition zone diameter (mm) | MIC (mg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ulvan | Ulvan-chitosan hydrogel | Ulvan | Ulvan-chitosan hydrogel | |
| Gram-positive strain | ||||
| - | - | - | - | |
| - | 18 ± 0.05 | - | 12.5 ± 0.0 | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| 15 ± 0.50 | 18 ± 0.11 | 12.50 ± 0.0 | 3.12 ± 0.0 | |
| 15 ± 0.21 | 15 ± 0.11 | 6.25 ± 0.0 | 0.78 ± 0.0 | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| Gram-negative strain | ||||
| 13 ± 0.30 | 20 ± 0.50 | 12.50 ± 0.0 | 1.56 ± 0.0 | |
| 12 ± 0.50 | 20 ± 2.00 | 12.50 ± 0.0 | 3.12 ± 0.0 | |
| 12 ± 0.10 | 18 ± 0.05 | 25.00 ± 0.0 | 3.12 ± 0.0 | |
| 11 ± 0.21 | 12 ± 0.50 | 6.25 ± 0.0 | 0.78 ± 0.0 | |
| 12 ± 0.00 | 12 ± 0.05 | 6.25 ± 0.0 | 0.78 ± 0.0 | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| Yeast strain | ||||
| 18 ± 0.10 | 18 ± 0.05 | 12.5 ± 0.0 | 3.12 ± 0.0 | |
| Fungus strain | ||||
| - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | |
*Indicate fish pathogens.
Fig. 8Antimicrobial activity of extracted ulvan and prepared ulvan-chitosan hydrogel against different indicator pathogens
Antibiotic suitability test for bacterial pathogens towards different types of antibiotics
| Antibiotic | Pathogen inhibition zone diameter (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin (AM)10 | 5 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tetracycline (TE)30 | 11 | 24 | 13 | 25 | 21 | 10 | - | 23 |
| Cephradine (CE)30 | 5 | - | 5 | - | 12 | 5 | - | - |
| Nalidixic (NA)30 | 10 | - | 9 | 19 | 10 | 10 | - | 20 |
| Amoxicillin (AX)25 | 5 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 15 | 6 | - | - |
| Ofloxacin (OFX)5 | 27 | 26 | 27 | 30 | 18 | 27 | 10 | 20 |
| Oxacillin (OX)1 | 5 | - | 5 | - | 15 | - | - | - |
| Erythromycin (E)15 | - | 10 | 5 | 23 | 14 | - | 17 | - |
| Ceftriaxone (CRO)30 | 5 | - | 5 | - | 11 | 5 | - | - |
| Tazobactam (TPZ)110 | 5 | - | 6 | - | 13 | - | - | - |
| Vancomycin (VA)30 | 6 | 27 | 6 | 26 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 12 |
Fig. 9Antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus ATCC 25,923 and A. hydrophila to different types of antibiotics using disc diffusion method
Fig. 10Anti-fouling activity of the purified ulvan. Macrographs show the biofilm under light microscope as dense collective (upper) in case of the control (without ulvan treatment), while the biofilm shown under light microscope as loose and disrupted (lower) when treated with ulvan