| Literature DB >> 35347587 |
Ankit Jana1, Arkadyuti Bhattacharjee1, Sabya Sachi Das2, Niraj Kumar Jha3, Avani Srivastava1, Akshpita Choudhury1, Rahul Bhattacharjee1, Swagata De4, Asma Perveen5, Danish Iqbal6, Piyush Kumar Gupta7, Saurabh Kumar Jha8, Shreesh Ojha9, Sandeep Kumar Singh2, Janne Ruokolainen10, Kavindra Kumar Kesari11, Ghulam Md Ashraf12,13.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most complex progressive neurological disorders involving degeneration of neuronal connections in brain cells leading to cell death. AD is predominantly detected among elder people (> 65 years), mostly diagnosed with the symptoms of memory loss and cognitive dysfunctions. The multifarious pathogenesis of AD comprises the accumulation of pathogenic proteins, decreased neurotransmission, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. The conventional therapeutic approaches are limited to symptomatic benefits and are ineffective against disease progression. In recent years, researchers have shown immense interest in the designing and fabrication of various novel therapeutics comprised of naturally isolated hybrid molecules. Hybrid therapeutic compounds are developed from the combination of pharmacophores isolated from bioactive moieties which specifically target and block various AD-associated pathogenic pathways. The method of designing hybrid molecules has numerous advantages over conventional multitarget drug development methods. In comparison to in silico high throughput screening, hybrid molecules generate quicker results and are also less expensive than fragment-based drug development. Designing hybrid-multitargeted therapeutic compounds is thus a prospective approach in developing an effective treatment for AD. Nevertheless, several issues must be addressed, and additional researches should be conducted to develop hybrid therapeutic compounds for clinical usage while keeping other off-target adverse effects in mind. In this review, we have summarized the recent progress on synthesis of hybrid compounds, their molecular mechanism, and therapeutic potential in AD. Using synoptic tables, figures, and schemes, the review presents therapeutic promise and potential for the development of many disease-modifying hybrids into next-generation medicines for AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Cellular pathways; Neuronal molecular targets; Pathogenesis; Targeted hybrid therapeutics
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35347587 PMCID: PMC9148293 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02779-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Neurobiol ISSN: 0893-7648 Impact factor: 5.682
Fig. 1Schematic showing various hypotheses and pathomechanism of AD
Fig. 2Hybrid multitargeted therapeutic compounds against multifactorial character of AD
Fig. 3The chemical structure of hybrid compounds along with their serial number
Role of different hybrid compounds against AD
| Hybrid compound | AChE inhibitor | β-amyloid antiaggregation | Antioxidant | Other activities | Clinical study | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridin-9-amine (Cpd1A) | ✔□ | BChE inhibitory activities | 51.3 nM | In vitro | [ | ||
| 6-Chloro-N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridin-9- amine (Cpd1B) | ✔□ | BChE inhibitory activities | 11.2 nM | In vitro | [ | ||
| Mixture of silibinin hemisuccinate and 6- aminohexamethylene tacrine (N1 -(1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridin-9- yl)hexane-1,6-diamine)Cpd2 | ✔□ | ✔□ | BChE inhibitory activities | 53.9 nM | In vivo, In vitro | [ | |
| Oxoisoaporphine-tacrine | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | nM range (41–57 nM) | In vitro | [ | |
| Tacrine–benzofuran hybrid Cpd 3 | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Metal chelation activity | 38.6 nM | In vitro | [ |
| Tacrine-melatonin hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | Able to cross BBB | 0.008 nM(40 000-fold more potent than tacrine) | In vitro | [ | |
| Tacrine-ferulic acid hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Inhibition of the PAS of AChE BChE inhibitory activities | 4.4 nM | In vitro | [ |
Donepezil and Ebselen hybrid Cpd 4 | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor ( | 0.097 μM | In vitro | [ |
| DNP based L-glutamic acid hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | BChE inhibitory activities, BBB permeation ability | 0.10–0.53 μM | In vitro | [ |
| N-Cbz-L-Glu(OEt)-[NH-2-(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)ethyl] (L-3) | ✔□ | Protected rat hippocampal slices against oxygen–glucose deprivation, becoming promising anti-Alzheimer's and anti-stroke lead compounds | 4.99 µM | In vitro | [ | ||
| N-Cbz-L-Glu(OEt)-[NH-2-(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)ethyl] (L-1) | ✔□ | Blocks the voltage-dependent calcium channels | 0.53 µM | In vitro | [ | ||
| Donepezil-N(1benzylpiperidin4yl)5 aryl isoxazole 3 carboxamide derivative | ✔□ | ✔□ | BChE inhibitory activities | 16.07 μM | In vitro | [ | |
| Donepezil-tacrine hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | BChE inhibition | Subnanomolar or low nanomolar range | In vitro and in silico | [ | |
| Donepezil-Benzylpiperidine hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Tau hyperphosphorylation inhibition, metal chelation activity | 4.0–30.0 μM | In silico | [ |
| Carbamate derivative Cpd 6 | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Penetrates BBB, offers benign safety, neuroprotection, and pseudo-irreversible BChE inhibition | 5.3 nM (for BChE) | In vivo and in silico | [ |
| Indanone–carbamate hybrid Cpd 7 | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | 4.64 μM | In vitro and in silico | [ | |
| Coumarin-dithiocarbamate hybrid Cpd 8 | ✔□ | ✔□ | Metal-chelating ability, good BBB permeability and low toxicity on SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell | 0.027 μM | In vitro and in vivo | [ | |
| Chromanone-dithiocarbamate hybrid Cpd 9 | ✔□ | ✔□ | Ability to penetrate the BBB and low neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells | 0.10 μM | In vitro, in vivo and in silico | [ | |
| Phthalimide-dithiocarbamate hybrid Cpd 10 | ✔□ | Anti BChE activity, possesses drug-like properties and able to cross the BBB | 4.6 μM | In vitro and in silico | [ | ||
| 4′-aminochalcone-revastigmine hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Selective monoamine oxidase B inhibitor and a selective biometal chelator | 4.91 μM | In vitro | [ |
| Scutellarein carbamate derivative Cpd 13 | ✔□ | ✔□ | Bio-metal chelating and neuroprotective properties | 0.57 μM | In vitro | [ | |
| 4′-aminochalcone-revastigmine hybrid Cpd 12 | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Selective monoamine oxidase B inhibitor (IC50 = 0.29 μM) and a selective biometal chelator | 4.91 μM | In vitro | [ |
| 2-methoxy-phenyl dimethyl-carbamate derivative Cpd 14B | ✔□ | ✔□ | Potent ABTS | 0.097 μM | In vitro | [ | |
| Apigenin-rivastigmine hybrid Cpd 15 | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Remarkable dyskinesia recovery rate and response efficiency | 6.8 μM | In vitro and in vivo | [ |
| Phenserine | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | 22 nM | In vitro and in vivo | [ | |
| Tolserine | ✔□ | NA | 0.01 µM | In vivo | [ | ||
| Galantamine (GAL) and curcumin (CU) hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | 7.91 to 52.53 µM | In vitro | [ | |
| Galantamine-camphane hybrid | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | 0.0029–0.0099 µM | In silico | [ | |
| Cpd 16 | ✔□ | ✔□ | Tau hyperphosphorylation inhibition | 2.39 nM | In vivo | [ | |
| Naphthyridine- and thienopyridine-based rhein-huprine hybrids | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Tau hyperphosphorylation inhibition | 3.60 nM | In vitro | [ |
Novel hybrid therapeutic compounds against AD
| Hybrid compound | AChE inhibitor | β-amyloid antiaggregation | Antioxidant | Other activities | IC50 value | Clinical study | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amentoflavone | ✔□ | NA | 0.26 µM | In vitro | [ | |||
| ✔□ | NA | 4.5 µM | In vitro and in silico | [ | ||||
| Cpd18, berberine linked to phenol by 4-carbon spacers | ✔□ | NA | 0.097 µM | In vitro and in silico | [ | |||
| Berberine-pyrocatechol hybrid (compound 19) | ✔□ | NA | 0.123 µM | In vitro | [ | |||
| Berberine-hydroquinone hybrid (compound 20) | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | 0.460 μM | In vitro | [ | |
| Ber-D Cpd 21 | ✔□ | Cu chelation, reduces cellulo multifaceted toxicity in AD | NA | In vitro and in silico | [ | |||
| Bis(9)-( −)-Meptazinol (B9M) | ✔□ | ✔□ | NA | 3.9 nM | In vitro | [ | ||
| Ferulic acid-memoquin hybrids, Cpd 22 | ✔□ | ✔□ | ✔□ | Can cross the BBB | 3.2 μM | In vitro | [ | |
Fig. 4Illustration shows specific role of each hybrid therapeutic compound against AD