| Literature DB >> 35347176 |
Xue-Fang Hu1, Xiang-Yue Zhao1, Yin-Wei Gu1, Shu-Ping Jin1, Yi-Ping Cui1, Chang-Gui Lu2.
Abstract
The manipulation of surface plasmon polaritons plays a pivotal role in plasmonic science and technology, however, the modulation efficiency of the traditional method suffers from the weak light-matter interaction. Herein, we propose a new method to overcome this obstacle by directly controlling the couple of photon and electron. In this paper, a hybrid graphene-dielectric- interdigital electrode structure is numerically and experimentally investigated. The plasmon is excited due to the confined carrier which is regulated by the potential wells. The frequency of plasmon can be tuned over a range of ~ 33 cm-1, and the obtained maximum extinction ratio is 8% via changing the confined area and the density of carrier. These findings may open up a new path to design the high efficiency all-optical modulator because the electrons can also be driven optically.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35347176 PMCID: PMC8960793 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09176-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1The 3D schematic of the modulator, the movement and density of carrier are controlled by the voltage applied on the interdigital electrode. The energy of excited SPPs will be absorbed in the graphene layer and result in a resonant dip in transmission, which can be collected by the detector.
Figure 2(a) The electrical potential of the proposed structure (b) surface charge density distribution on the graphene under the voltage of 6 V (c) the surface charge density distribution versus different voltage (d) the surface charge density distribution versus different period of electrode.
Figure 3The SEM image of the sample (a) in the center (b) at the bondary of interdigital electrode.
Figure 4The transmission spectra at different voltage of the sample (a) with a period of 12 um (b) with a period of 14 um (c) the maximum ER of the sample is about 8%.
Figure 5(a) The schematic of simulation. (b) The transmission versus the width at the frequency of 840, 825 and 807 cm−1 respectively (c). The transmission versus the width at different Fermi energy.