| Literature DB >> 35345381 |
Sri Susilowati1,2, Hermawan Istiadi3, Suhartono Suhartono4, Yan Wisnu Prajoko5, Ignatius Riwanto6, Neni Susilaningsih7, Catharina Suharti8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the role of beetroot extract in overcoming the chemoresistance of Neoadjuvant Adriamycin Cyclophosphamide (NAC) regimens with a target immune response in the tumour microenvironment at the pre-clinical stage.Entities:
Keywords: Beetroot; CD8 T cells; Chemoresistance; Myeloid Derivative Suppressive Cells; Neoadjuvant Adriamycin-Cyclophosphamide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35345381 PMCID: PMC9360944 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.1061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1Consolidation of Report Trial
Figure 2Comparison graph of CD8 Expression Levels (mean ± SD) between Treatment Groups. The results of ANOVA followed by Post Hoc-Test, were significant if p < 0.05: * : significantly different from Group C2 with p value = 0.000 for group P1 and p = 0.000 for group P2. @: significantly different from Group C1 with a value of p = 0.000 for group P1 and p = 0.000 for group P2. # : significantly different from the P1 group with p value = 0.000
Figure 3Comparison Graph of CD11b Expression Levels (mean ± SD) between Treatment Groups.The results of ANOVA continued with Post Hoc-Test, meaningful if p < 0.05: * : significantly different from Group C2 with p-value = 0.012 . @ was significantly different from Group C1 with p = 0.006 for Group P1 and p = 0.000 for Group P2
Pathological Response Evaluation Results
| Treatment Group | Pathologic Response (n) | Response | No response | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | PR | NR | (n) | (n) | |
| C1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| C2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| P1* | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| P2* | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Note: Group C1, negative control, without treatment, Group C2 : AC only control, Group P1 : AC+ Beetroot extract at a dose 25 mg/kg BW treatment, Group P2: AC + Beetroot Extract at a dose 100 mg/kg BW Treatment; CR,Complete Response, PR, Partial respon
Figure 4The Representative Image of H&E Staining from Tumor Sample in Each Group (magnification 400x). A, Group C1, negative control without treatment; B, Group C2, AC only treatment; C, Group P1, AC + Beetroot extract at a dose 25 mg/kgBW treatment; D, Group P2, AC + Beetroot extract at a dose 100 mg/kgBW treatment
Summary of Correlation Test Results on Pathological Response Variable
| Independent variable | Corellation value ( R ) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| CD8 | 0,542 | 0,009 |
| CD11b | -0,660 | 0,001 |
Note: Spearman's rho correlation test, significant if p <0.05. Spearman's rho correlation degree: very weak (0-0.25); enough (0.26-0.5); (0.51-0.75) strong; 0.76-0.99 is very strong; 1 perfect correlation.