Literature DB >> 35343350

Modeling Pulsatility Index nomograms from different maternal and fetal vessels by quantile regression at 24-40 weeks of gestation: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Giuseppe Rizzo1,2, Maria Elena Pietrolucci1, Ilenia Mappa1, Victoria Bitsadze1,2, Jamilya Khizroeva1,2, Alexander Makatsariya2, Francesco D'Antonio3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent evidences highlight a considerable heterogeneity in the methodology of previously published studies reporting reference ranges for maternal and fetal Dopplers, which may have relevant implications in clinical practice. In view of these limitations, a standardized methodology to construct Doppler charts has been proposed. The aim of this study was to develop charts for pulsatility index (PI) of maternal and fetal Dopplers based upon the recently proposed standardized methodology and using quantile regression.
METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study including 2516 low-risk singleton pregnancies between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation. The mean uterine, umbilical (UA), middle cerebral (MCA) and their ratio (cerebroplacental ratio, CPR) centile values were established by quantile regression in the considered gestational interval. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of each maternal and fetal vessel was also computed to assess the intra- and inter-observer agreement of the results.
RESULTS: There was a good intra- and inter-observer agreement for each of the explored vessels (ICC >0.92 and >0.91 for a single and two observers, respectively). The 5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 95th centiles of the reference range for gestation were constructed by quantile regression and compared to previously established reference charts. All the Doppler indices significantly changed with gestation. Second-degree polynomial regression models better described the changes with gestation in PCR and MCA PI values while a linear model better predicted the changes of other Doppler indices with advancing gestation. When compared to other studies reporting reference ranges for maternal and fetal Dopplers, the present charts showed similar median values but different distribution from the median.
CONCLUSIONS: We provided prospective charts of maternal and fetal Dopplers based upon a previously proposed standardized methodology and using quantile regression. When compared to previously published studies, these new charts showed similar median values but different deviations from the median which may help in better differentiating cases at higher risk of placental insufficiency and adverse perinatal outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler reference ranges; middle cerebral artery Doppler; placental cerebral ratio; umbilical artery Doppler; uterine artery Doppler

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 35343350     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1767060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  3 in total

1.  Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the second half of pregnancy on fetal growth and hemodynamics: A prospective study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rizzo; Ilenia Mappa; Pavjola Maqina; Victoria Bitsadze; Jamilya Khizroeva; Alexander Makatsarya; Francesco D'Antonio
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.544

Review 2.  Placental Volume and Uterine Artery Doppler in Pregnancy Following In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Serena Resta; Gaia Scandella; Ilenia Mappa; Maria Elena Pietrolucci; Pavjola Maqina; Giuseppe Rizzo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Middle cerebral arterial flow redistribution is an indicator for intrauterine fetal compromise in late pregnancy in low-resource settings: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sam Ali; Michael G Kawooya; Josaphat Byamugisha; Isaac M Kakibogo; Esther A Biira; Adia N Kagimu; Diederick E Grobbee; David Zakus; Aris T Papageorghiou; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Marcus J Rijken
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 7.331

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.