| Literature DB >> 35343073 |
Ching-Yu Lin1,2, Bi-Juan Wang1, Yu-Ke Fu1, Chieh Huo1, Ya-Pei Wang1, Bo-Chih Chen1, Wei-Yi Liu1, Jen-Chih Tseng1,3, Shih Shen Jiang4, Zong-Lin Sie4, Kelvin K Tsai5,6, Chiou-Hwa Yuh4, Wen-Ching Wang7, Hsing-Jien Kung2, Chih-Pin Chuu1,8,9.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35343073 PMCID: PMC8958350 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Med ISSN: 2001-1326
FIGURE 1KDM4C expression is higher in metastatic prostate tumours as compared to primary prostate tumours and knockout of KDM4C suppresses migration and invasion of PCa cells both in vitro and in vivo. (A) GEO profiling of KDM4C gene expression level in adjacent normal prostate tissues, primary prostate tumours and metastasis prostate tumours extracted from GEO profile dataset GDS 2547 (HG‐U95C) (reporter: GPL93, 60153_at; gene ID: 23081). (B) Chandran Prostate dataset included 10 primary site prostate tumours and 21 metastatic prostate carcinomas. Expression of KDM4C gene was detected by CodeLink UniSet Human 20K I Bioarray (reporter: GE84522). (C) Grasso Prostate dataset included 59 primary site prostate tumours and 35 metastatic prostate carcinomas. Expression of KDM4C gene was detected by Agilent Human Genome 44K (reporter: A_32_P38313). (D) LaTulippe Prostate dataset included 23 primary site prostate tumours and 9 metastatic prostate carcinomas. Expression of KDM4C gene was detected by Human Genome U95A‐Av2 Array (reporter: 34980_at). (E) Migration and invasion of control C4‐2B (sgControl) cells and C4‐2B cells with CRISPR KDM4C knockout (sgKDM4C) was determined by transwell assay. (F) Migration and invasion of control LNCaP cells and LNCaP cells with KDM4C siRNA knockdown was determined by transwell assay. Western blotting confirmed the knockdown of KDM4C while β‐actin was used as loading control. Migration (G) and invasion (H) of C4‐2B cells being treated with 0, 10, 30 μM SD70 (KDM4C inhibitor) was examined by transwell assay. Migration (I) and invasion (J) of LNCaP cells being treated with 0, 10, 30 μM SD70 was examined by transwell assay. (K) Zebrafish xenotransplantation metastatic distance assay was used to compare the metastatic ability of sgControl cells (n = 48) and sgKDM4C cells (n = 48). Cells were injected into zebrafish yolk sac and xenotransplantation metastatic distance assay was measured three days post injection or five days post injection. The distribution and migration of sgControl and sgKDM4C cells in fish on the day of injection, 3rd and 5th day were shown in photography images. The xenotransplantation metastatic distance assay was measured three days post injection (dpi) (L) or five days post injection (M). Asterisks *, ** and *** represent statistically significantly different between the two groups being compared with p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001, respectively
FIGURE 2Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) analysis and Micro‐Western Array (MWA) analysis revealed that knockout of KDM4C affected c‐Myc, c‐Myc target genes and proteins involved in metabolic pathways. (A) Top six pathways of upregulation and downregulation normalized enrichment score (NES) gene sets which fulfill the statistical criteria in sgKDM4C vs. sgControl cells were demonstrated. (B) Enrichment score plots of MYC target genes set was presented. Normalized enrichment score (NES) absolute value > 1, p < .05 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25 was considered as reliable enrichment. (C) MWA was performed to analyse the difference in expression level of 96 antibodies targeting epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) marker proteins, proteins involved in glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and protein regulating cancer stemness in control C4‐2B cells and sgKDM4C C4‐2B. The results of MWA for proteins with significant changes were shown. (D) Heatmap was shown to demonstrate the proteins expression level with 1.2 fold increase or decrease in CRISPR knockout (sgKDM4C) cells as compared to control (sgControl) C4‐2B cells. Protein level was demonstrated using log2 value. (E) MWA was performed to analyse the difference in expression level of 96 antibodies targeting EMT marker proteins, proteins involved in glycolysis, TCA cycle and OXPHOS and protein regulating cancer stemness in control LNCaP cells and LNCaP with KDM4C siRNA knockdown. The results of MWA for proteins with significant changes were shown. (F) Heatmap was shown to demonstrate the proteins expression level with 1.2 fold increase or decrease in KDM4C knockdown LNCaP cells as compared to control LNCaP cells. Protein level was demonstrated using log2 value
FIGURE 3KDM4C directly binds to promoter of MYC and regulates PCa migration via c‐Myc while knockout of KDM4C affected mitochondrial function. (A) Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysed of binding between KDM4C protein and MYC promoter or control GAPDH promoter in sgControl and sgKDM4C C4‐2B cells. (B) Gene expression level of KDM4C and MYC in control C4‐2B and sgKDM4C C4‐2B cells was examined by qRT‐PCR. (C) Activity of MYC promoter in control C4‐2B cells and C4‐2B cells overexpressing KDM4C was determined by reporter gene assay. (D) Activity of MYC promoter in C4‐2B cells being treated with 0, 10, 30 μM of SD70 was determined by reporter gene assay. (E) Migration of sgControl or sgKDM4C C4‐2B cells with or without c‐Myc overexpression was measured by transwell assay. (F) Western blotting confirmed the knockout of KDM4C and overexpression of c‐Myc in sgControl cells and sgKDM4C cells. Function of mitochondria metabolism in sgControl C4‐2B cells (blue color) and sgKDM4C C4‐2B cells (red color) was examined by Seahorse platform for oxygen consumption rate (OCR) (G) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) (H). (I) Basal respiration, ATP production and maximum respiration of the mitochondria in sgControl cells and sgKDM4C cells was calculated from OCR trace in (G). (J) The glycolysis, glycolytic capacity and glycolytic reserve in sgControl cells and sgKDM4C cells was calculated from ECAR trace in (H). Asterisks *, ** and *** represent statistically significantly different between the two groups being compared with p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001, respectively
FIGURE 4Knockout of KDM4C affects expression of metabolic genes and proteins as well as suppresses migration of PCa cells via repression of LDHA and decrease of lactate secretion. (A) Expression levels of metabolic genes, including genes regulating glucose transporter and glycolysis (ALDOA, GAPDH, GPI, HK2, LDHA, PFK, TALDO1), gene regulating TCA cycle (ACO1, IDH1, MDH1, PDHA, PDHB), gene regulating lipid synthesis (FASN, Mlycd), genes regulating glutamine metabolism (GGT1, GLS) and genes regulating pentose phosphate pathway (G6PD, PGD, PGLS) in sgControl and sgKDM4C cells was examined by qRT‐PCR. (B) Western blot analysis of expression levels of important proteins involved in metabolism and EMT in sgControl cells and sgKDM4C cells, including KDM4C, c‐Myc, GAPDH, HK2, PFK, TALDO1, ACO1, MDH1, FASN, GGT1, PKM2, PDH, G6PD, LDH, LDHA, LDHB, GLS, PGD, β‐catenin, E‐cadherin, Snail, MMP‐2. Zymography of MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 was examined. Expression level of β‐actin and α‐tubulin was used as loading control. (C) Gene expression of KDM4C, CDH1, SNAl1, CTNNB1, MMP2, CDH2 and VIM was examined in sgControl vs. sgKDM4C cells with qRT‐PCR. (D) Migration of sgControl cells, sgKDM4C cells and sgKDM4C cells with LDHA overexpression was examined by transwell assay. (E) Overexpression of LDHA was confirmed by Western blotting assay. (F) Migration of C4‐2B cells with or without LDHA siRNA knockdown was examined by transwell assay. (G) Knockdown of LDHA was confirmed by Western blotting assay. Secretion of lactate (H) and accumulation of pyruvate (I) was measured in sgControl cells and sgKDM4C ells. (J) Effects of KDM4C knockout on metabolites and proteins in glycolytic metabolism pathway were shown. Green arrows represent downregulation while red arrows represent upregulation in sgKDM4C cells as observed in our current study. Asterisks *, ** and *** represent statistically significantly different between the two groups being compared with p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001, respectively