Ying Yang1, Chang Zeng2, Kun Yang1, Shaohua Xu1, Zhou Zhang2, Qinyun Cai2, Chuan He3, Wei Zhang2, Song-Mei Liu1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Center for Gene Diagnosis & Program of Clinical Laboratory, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Department of Chemistry and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
Aim: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) has become the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in most countries. Elucidating novel epigenetic contributors to DN can not only enhance our understanding of this complex disorder, but also lay the foundation for developing more effective monitoring tools and preventive interventions in the future, thus contributing to our ultimate goal of improving patient care. Methods: The 5hmC-Seal, a highly selective, chemical labeling technique, was used to profile genome-wide 5-hydroxymethylcytosines (5hmC), a stable cytosine modification type marking gene activation, in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from a cohort of patients recruited at Zhongnan Hospital, including T2D patients with nephropathy (DN, n = 12), T2D patients with non-DN vascular complications (non-DN, n = 29), and T2D patients without any complication (controls, n = 14). Differentially analysis was performed to find DN-associated 5hmC features, followed by the exploration of biomarker potential of 5hmC in cfDNA for DN using a machine learning approach. Results: Genome-wide analyses of 5hmC in cfDNA detected 427 and 336 differential 5hmC modifications associated with DN, compared with non-DN individuals and controls, and suggested relevant pathways such as NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and tyrosine metabolism. Our exploration using a machine learning approach revealed an exploratory model comprised of ten 5hmC genes showing the possibility to distinguish DN from non-DN individuals or controls. Conclusion: Genome-wide analysis suggests the possibility of exploiting novel 5hmC in patient-derived cfDNA as a non-invasive tool for monitoring DN in high risk T2D patients in the future.
Aim: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) has become the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in most countries. Elucidating novel epigenetic contributors to DN can not only enhance our understanding of this complex disorder, but also lay the foundation for developing more effective monitoring tools and preventive interventions in the future, thus contributing to our ultimate goal of improving patient care. Methods: The 5hmC-Seal, a highly selective, chemical labeling technique, was used to profile genome-wide 5-hydroxymethylcytosines (5hmC), a stable cytosine modification type marking gene activation, in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from a cohort of patients recruited at Zhongnan Hospital, including T2D patients with nephropathy (DN, n = 12), T2D patients with non-DN vascular complications (non-DN, n = 29), and T2D patients without any complication (controls, n = 14). Differentially analysis was performed to find DN-associated 5hmC features, followed by the exploration of biomarker potential of 5hmC in cfDNA for DN using a machine learning approach. Results: Genome-wide analyses of 5hmC in cfDNA detected 427 and 336 differential 5hmC modifications associated with DN, compared with non-DN individuals and controls, and suggested relevant pathways such as NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and tyrosine metabolism. Our exploration using a machine learning approach revealed an exploratory model comprised of ten 5hmC genes showing the possibility to distinguish DN from non-DN individuals or controls. Conclusion: Genome-wide analysis suggests the possibility of exploiting novel 5hmC in patient-derived cfDNA as a non-invasive tool for monitoring DN in high risk T2D patients in the future.
Entities:
Keywords:
5-hydroxymethylcytosine; cfDNA; epigenetics; nephropathy; type 2 diabetes
Authors: Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jennifer Harrow; Adam Frankish; Jose M Gonzalez; Electra Tapanari; Mark Diekhans; Felix Kokocinski; Bronwen L Aken; Daniel Barrell; Amonida Zadissa; Stephen Searle; If Barnes; Alexandra Bignell; Veronika Boychenko; Toby Hunt; Mike Kay; Gaurab Mukherjee; Jeena Rajan; Gloria Despacio-Reyes; Gary Saunders; Charles Steward; Rachel Harte; Michael Lin; Cédric Howald; Andrea Tanzer; Thomas Derrien; Jacqueline Chrast; Nathalie Walters; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Baikang Pei; Michael Tress; Jose Manuel Rodriguez; Iakes Ezkurdia; Jeltje van Baren; Michael Brent; David Haussler; Manolis Kellis; Alfonso Valencia; Alexandre Reymond; Mark Gerstein; Roderic Guigó; Tim J Hubbard Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Anshul Kundaje; Wouter Meuleman; Jason Ernst; Misha Bilenky; Angela Yen; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Pouya Kheradpour; Zhizhuo Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Michael J Ziller; Viren Amin; John W Whitaker; Matthew D Schultz; Lucas D Ward; Abhishek Sarkar; Gerald Quon; Richard S Sandstrom; Matthew L Eaton; Yi-Chieh Wu; Andreas R Pfenning; Xinchen Wang; Melina Claussnitzer; Yaping Liu; Cristian Coarfa; R Alan Harris; Noam Shoresh; Charles B Epstein; Elizabeta Gjoneska; Danny Leung; Wei Xie; R David Hawkins; Ryan Lister; Chibo Hong; Philippe Gascard; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Eric Chuah; Angela Tam; Theresa K Canfield; R Scott Hansen; Rajinder Kaul; Peter J Sabo; Mukul S Bansal; Annaick Carles; Jesse R Dixon; Kai-How Farh; Soheil Feizi; Rosa Karlic; Ah-Ram Kim; Ashwinikumar Kulkarni; Daofeng Li; Rebecca Lowdon; GiNell Elliott; Tim R Mercer; Shane J Neph; Vitor Onuchic; Paz Polak; Nisha Rajagopal; Pradipta Ray; Richard C Sallari; Kyle T Siebenthall; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Michael Stevens; Robert E Thurman; Jie Wu; Bo Zhang; Xin Zhou; Arthur E Beaudet; Laurie A Boyer; Philip L De Jager; Peggy J Farnham; Susan J Fisher; David Haussler; Steven J M Jones; Wei Li; Marco A Marra; Michael T McManus; Shamil Sunyaev; James A Thomson; Thea D Tlsty; Li-Huei Tsai; Wei Wang; Robert A Waterland; Michael Q Zhang; Lisa H Chadwick; Bradley E Bernstein; Joseph F Costello; Joseph R Ecker; Martin Hirst; Alexander Meissner; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Bing Ren; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Ting Wang; Manolis Kellis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 69.504