| Literature DB >> 35342836 |
Takahiro Asai1, Eisuke Sakuma1,2, Tetsuya Mizutani1, Yohei Ishizaka1, Koji Ori1, Takatoshi Ueki2.
Abstract
Objectives: A precise anatomical understanding of the morphology of the spine is indispensable for neck and low back pain therapy including rehabilitation. However, few studies have directly addressed spinal morphology with a focus on the height of the vertebral body and discs. The aim of the current study was to analyze sex- and age-related changes in the spine by measuring the distance between adjacent centers of the intervertebral disc spaces from the posterior aspect in cadavers and by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements at the cervical and lumbar vertebral levels.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; anatomy; degeneration; gender difference; spine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35342836 PMCID: PMC8894105 DOI: 10.2490/prm.20220011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Rehabil Med ISSN: 2432-1354
Fig. 1.The distance between the adjacent centers of the intervertebral disc spaces [(i.e., the vertebral body and half adjacent disc height (VBAD height)] was measured as shown.
Cervical spine: age and number of subjects undergoing MRI analysis
| Age (years) | Men | Mean±SD | Women | Mean±SD |
| 30–39 | 21 | 33.7±3.89 | 20 | 33.7±2.64 |
| 40–49 | 67 | 45.0±2.74 | 50 | 44.6±2.93 |
| 50–59 | 34 | 54.0±2.37 | 28 | 53.7±2.81 |
| 60–69 | 30 | 64.3±2.92 | 25 | 64.9±3.17 |
| 70–79 | 31 | 74.9±3.18 | 38 | 74.4±2.49 |
| 80–89 | 13 | 80.7±1.38 | 13 | 84.1±2.33 |
MRI measurements of the cervical spine were performed in 370 patients (196 men and 174 women) with neck pain.
Lumbar spine: age and number of subjects undergoing MRI analysis
| Age (years) | Men | Mean±SD | Women | Mean±SD |
| 30–39 | 41 | 33.3±3.44 | 40 | 33.0±2.52 |
| 40–49 | 67 | 44.0±2.26 | 50 | 43.5±2.40 |
| 50–59 | 50 | 53.6±2.59 | 56 | 53.8±2.64 |
| 60–69 | 47 | 63.9±2.22 | 69 | 63.9±2.71 |
| 70–79 | 55 | 74.3±3.00 | 55 | 73.6±2.41 |
| 80–89 | 55 | 82.3±2.16 | 75 | 84.4±3.39 |
MRI measurements from the lower thoracic vertebrae to the lumbar vertebrae were performed in 660 patients (315 men and 345 women) with low back pain.
Fig. 2.In cadaveric measurements, the mean VBAD height was statistically greater (P<0.05) in men than in women from C3 to L5/S1; the exceptions were the C7 and Th12 vertebrae, for which there was no difference. Means and SEs are indicated.
Fig. 3.MRI measurements of the VBAD height of cervical spines in men with neck pain. Means and SEs are indicated.
Fig. 4.MRI measurements of the VBAD height of cervical spines in women with neck pain. Means and SEs are indicated.
Fig. 5.MRI measurements of the VBAD height of lumbar spines in men with low back pain. Means and SEs are indicated.
Fig. 7.Comparison of the cadaveric and MRI VBAD heights of the cervical spine. Means and SEs are indicated.
Fig. 8.Comparison of the cadaveric and MRI VBAD heights from the lower thoracic vertebrae to the lumbar vertebrae. Means and SEs are indicated.