| Literature DB >> 35342741 |
Simone Stella1, Erica Tirloni1, Cristian Bernardi1, Greta Acerbis1, Teresa Manginelli2.
Abstract
The study evaluated the outcomes of cattle liver postmortem examination (64,766 animals) obtained from three slaughterhouses (two located in Lombardy, Northern Italy, and one in Puglia, Southern Italy) through the period 2016-2020. The frequency of specific lesions determining liver condemnation was calculated and the influence of several factors (animal age/category, geographical area, season, plant) was considered. A mean prevalence of 8% was observed, with a significant difference among the plants (range 6.4-12.8%). A significant difference was observed among the animal categories and age classes, with higher condemnation rates in animals aged more than 30 months (mainly cows). Steatosis was the most frequent lesion observed in cows (about half of the total), whereas liver abscesses were the most diffused in younger animals (half of the total in young bulls). Other frequently observed lesions were distomatosis and perihepatitis. A different pattern was observed between the two geographical areas, with a higher prevalence of steatosis in Lombardy (mainly intensive dairy farming), and of distomatosis in Puglia (animals mainly grazed on pasture). The season influenced the prevalence of lesions, and especially of steatosis (higher in summer). A different lesion prevalence was also observed between the two plants on similar animal populations, suggesting a difference in the notification and classification procedure among the plants. This study highlights the importance of a proper sharing procedure of the information obtained from the post mortem inspection in order to facilitate an optimal use of Food Chain Information and a useful feedback for farmers. ©Copyright: the Author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Abscesses; Distomatosis; Liver lesions; Post mortem inspection; Steatosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35342741 PMCID: PMC8941309 DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2022.10035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Food Saf ISSN: 2239-7132
Composition of slaughtered animal population.
| Plant A | Plant B | Plant C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Age class | ||||||
| <8 months | 674 | 2.1 | n.a. | n.a. | 789 | 3.0 |
| 8-30 months | 8,721 | 27.5 | n.a. | n.a. | 22,592 | 87.0 |
| >30 months | 22,289 | 70.3 | n.a. | n.a. | 2,596 | 10.0 |
| Category | ||||||
| V (veals) | 575 | 1,8 | 585 | 8.2 | n.a. | n.a. |
| Z (young cattle) | 200 | 0,6 | 40 | 0.6 | n.a. | n.a. |
| A (young bulls) | 4,884 | 15.4 | 243 | 3.4 | n.a. | n.a. |
| B (bulls) | 187 | 0,6 | 57 | 0.8 | n.a. | n.a. |
| D (cows) | 22,392 | 70.7 | 5,346 | 75.2 | n.a. | n.a. |
| E (heifers) | 3,446 | 10.9 | 834 | 11.7 | n.a. | n.a. |
n.a.: information not available.
Bovine liver lesions prevalence in the three slaughtering plants.
| N condemned/total livers | Lesions prevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Plant A | 2,648/31,684 | 8.4B |
| Plant B | 906/7,105 | 12.8A |
| Plant C | 1,652/25,977 | 6.4C |
| Total | 5,206/64,766 | 8.0 |
A,B,CSignificant difference among the plants (P<0.01).
Prevalence of the specific liver lesions in the total animal population.
| Lesion | N condemned livers | % (total animal population) | % (total lesions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steatosis | 1,790 | 2.8 | 34.2 |
| Abscesses | 1,009 | 1.6 | 19.3 |
| Distomatosis | 790 | 1.2 | 15.1 |
| Hydatidosis | 204 | 0.3 | 3.9 |
| Fibrosis/cirrhosis | 135 | 0.2 | 2.6 |
| Perihepatitis | 678 | 1.0 | 12.9 |
| Telangiectasis | 362 | 0.6 | 6.9 |
| Other lesions | 268 | 0.4 | 5.1 |
Figure 1.Liver lesion prevalence in different age classes and bovine categories.
Distribution of the main liver lesions among age classes and categories.
| Steatosis | Abscesses | Distomatosis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % (animals) | % (lesions) | % (animals) | % (lesions) | % (animals) | % (lesions) | |
| Age class | ||||||
| <8 months | 0.2[ | 10.5 | 0.8b | 47.4 | 0.3[ | 15.8 |
| 8-30 months | 0.6[ | 13.5 | 1.8[ | 36.8 | 1.5[ | 31.4 |
| >30 months | 5.7[ | 50.6 | 1.0[ | 8.9 | 0.7[ | 5.9 |
| Category | ||||||
| V (veals) | 0.7[ | 80.0 | 0.2[ | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Z (young cattle) | 0.4[ | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| A (young bulls) | 0.3[ | 11.9 | 1.3[ | 48.9 | 0.2[ | 8.9 |
| B (bulls) | 0.0[ | 0.0 | 0.8 | 13.3 | 1.6[ | 26.7 |
| D (cows) | 5.8[ | 50.9 | 1.4[ | 11.9 | 0.3[ | 2.4 |
| E (heifers) | 0.0[ | 0.0 | 1.0[ | 21.5 | 0.0C | 1.0 |
A,B,CSignificant difference among the age classes or categories (P<0.01). a,bSignificant difference among the age classes or categories (P<0.05).
Figure 2.Seasonal variation in the detection rate of the three main liver lesions.
Figure 3.Prevalence of the main liver lesions – Comparison between geographical areas.
Figure 4.Prevalence of the specific liver lesions in cows slaughtered in plants A and B.