| Literature DB >> 35342738 |
Dhouha Alimi1, Azhar Hajri1, Selim Jallouli2, Hichem Sebai1.
Abstract
Background: Ticks and tick-borne diseases are a severe economic and public-health problem for cattle producers. The emergence of acaricide resistance to synthetic chemical treatments has prompted interest in developing alternative tick control methods. Aim: The main objective of the current research was to identify the chemical structure of Carthamus tinctorius and Nasturtium officinale seed oils and to assess their anti-tick properties against Hyalomma scupense ticks both alone and in combination (1:1).Entities:
Keywords: Acaracidal activity; Carthamus tinctorius; H. scupense; Nasturtium officinale; synergistic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35342738 PMCID: PMC8956231 DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i1.10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Vet J ISSN: 2218-6050
Composition of seeds oils from C. tinctorius and N. officinale obtained by GC-MS.
| RT(minutes) | Compounds | Molecular formula | Content (%) of total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 6.931 | Myristic acid | C14H28O2 | 0.09 | - |
| 9.511 | Palmitic acid | C16H32O2 | 6.54 | 8.02 |
| 12.876 | Linoleic acid | C18H32O2 | 84.48 | 10.58 |
| 12.773 | Linolenic acid | C18H30O2 | - | 50.78 |
| 13.265 | Stearic acid | C18H36O2 | 3.77 | 3.01 |
| 16.309 | Oleic acid | C18H34O2 | 0.33 | - |
| 16.795 | Oxiraneoctanoic acid | C10H18O3 | 0.50 | - |
| 16.870 | Eicosadienoic acid | C20H36O2 | - | 0.3 |
| 17.001 | Gondoic acid | C20H38O2 | 0.21 | 13.57 |
| 17.677 | Arachidic acid | C20H40O2 | 0.63 | 4.12 |
| 20.984 | Erucidic acid | C22H42O2 | - | 6.62 |
| 21.213 | Behenic acid | C22H44O2 | 0.31 | 1.24 |
| 22.700 | Nervonic acid | C24H46O2 | 0.17 | 1.05 |
| 22.912 | Lignoceric acid | C24H48O2 | 0.16 | 0.71 |
| Total | 97 | 100 | ||
Fig. 1.The major component of seed oil of C. tinctorius (84.48%).
Fig. 2.The major component of seed oil of N. officinale (50.78%).
Mean (± SE) standard deviation of biological activity of H. scupense engorged females after exposure to different concentrations of C. tinctorius, N. officinale and combination of seed oils.
| Treatment | Concentrations (mg/ml) | FW ± SE | MA15 ± SE | EW ± SE | RI ± SE | IO (%) | Hatching (%) (visual) | REI (%) | EP (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (2%) Tween 80 (negative control) | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.134 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 100 | 99.14 | 0 | ||
|
| 300 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 95.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 200 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 84.77 ± 5.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 125 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 63.16 ± 3.10a | 0.0118 ± 0.03a | 0.047 ± 0.001a | 67.16 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 100 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 34.11 ± 6.10a | 0.0121 ± 0.02a | 0.048 ± 0.005a | 63.88 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
|
| 300 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 88.68 ± 5.60a | 0.0060 ± 0.04a | 0.024 ± 0.005a | 82.09 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 200 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 63.37 ± 8.77a | 0.0106 ± 0.05a | 0.042 ± 0.001a | 68.36 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 125 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 50.82 ± 7.44a | 0.0115 ± 0.05a | 0.046 ± 0.002a | 65.67 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 100 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 20.66 ± 2.66a | 0.02 ± 0.06a | 0.08 ± 0.004a | 40.30 | 80 | 46 | 53.61 | |
|
| 300 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 0.000 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 200 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 0.000 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 125 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 58.69 ± 5.13a | 0.0100 ± 0.02a | 0.042 ± 0.005a | 68.91 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 100 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 47.11 ± 6.12a | 0.0114 ± 0.06a | 0.046 ± 0.002a | 65.97 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
|
| 12.5 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 82.10 ± 3.66 | 0.00 ± 0.000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
(FW): Mean of female weights; (SE): Standard error; (MA15): Mean % adult mortality within 15 days; (EW): Egg weights; (REI): Reproductive efficiency index; (EP): Efficacy of the product.
Three replicates each having 15 adult females ticks were used for each treatment.
aSignificant difference in relation to the negative control.
(ANOVA one way p =< 0.0001)..
The activity of seed oils from N. officinale, C. tinctorius and in association on larval mortality of H. scupense.
| Concentration (mg/ml) | Mortality (%)[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Association (%) | |||
| (2%) Tween 80 (negative control) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 25 | 25.31 ± 3.58 | 4.57 ± 1.44 | 36.33 ± 6.81 |
| 50 | 44.51 ± 5.73 | 40.72 ± 2.99 | 52.57 ± 3.10 |
| 100 | 66.05 ± 3.07 | 57.48 ± 5.72 | 69.33 ± 4.58 |
| 125 | 73.46 ± 2.14 | 64.02 ± 4.24 | 83.13 ± 3.38 |
| 200 | 87.71 ± 5.23 | 75.89 ± 4.37 | 99.69 ± 0.53 |
| 300 | 91.88 ± 0.00 | 83.36 ± 3.50 | 100 ± 0.00 |
Mortality in control groups was calculated as dead larvae/total larvae × 100;
Mortality in groups treated with seed oils was calculated as abbott.
p < 0.0001 and
p < 0.01 compared with negative control.
Lethal concentrations required to cause 50% or 90% mortality (LC50 and LC90) of H. scupense engorged females and larvae after exposure to C. tinctorius, N. officinale and their combination with a 95% confidence interval.
| Acaricidal test | Treatment | LC50 | IC | LC90 | IC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality of engorged females (%) (AIT) |
| 120.11 | 108.17–123.10 | 210.37 | 191.10–228.53 | 0.91 |
|
| 124.08 | 115.26–134.64 | 341.16 | 339.21–365.44 | 0.97 | |
| Association | 117.40 | 95.22–120.33 | 152.08 | 151.02–166.36 | 0.95 | |
| Mortality larvae (%) (LPT) |
| 61.78 | 60.68–82.72 | 280.09 | 238.84–291.03 | 0.98 |
|
| 84.16 | 81.71–97.59 | 318.37 | 311.08–322.81 | 0.97 | |
| Association | 47.96 | 44.77–66.11 | 132.01 | 128.11–1471 | 0.93 |
SF for plant seed oils.
| Plants | Seed oil combination | SF against | SF against | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engorged females | Larvae | Engorged females | Larvae | ||
| 1:1 | 1.02 | 1.28 | 1.05 | 1.75 | |
(SF): Synergistic factor.
(SF > 1): additive; (SF < 1): antagonism; (SF = LC50): individual extract/LC50 combined extract.
Synergism.