| Literature DB >> 35342710 |
A S Stensgaard1,2, M E Sengupta1, M Chriel3, S T Nielsen3, H H Petersen3.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii is a zoonotic protozoan parasite capable of infecting possibly all warm-blooded animals including humans, and is one of the most widespread zoonotic pathogens known. Free-ranging wildlife can be valuable sentinels for oocyst contaminated environments, as well as a potential source for human foodborne infection with T. gondii. Here we aimed to determine the sero-prevalence of T. gondii in Danish wild deer populations and examine risk factors associated with increased exposure to the parasite. Blood samples were collected from 428 cervids (87 fallow deer (Dama dama), 272 red deer (Cervus elaphus), 55 roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and 14 sika deer (Cervus Nippon) from 23 hunting sites in Denmark. The animals were shot during the hunting season 2017/2018, and screened for antibodies against T. gondii using a commercial ELISA kit. One hundred and five (24.5%) cervids were sero-positive. Sero-prevalence was significantly different between species (p < 0.05), with odds of sero-positivity being 4.5 times higher in roe deer than fallow deer, and 3.0 times higher in red deer than in fallow deer. A significant increase in sero-prevalence with age was observed, driven by a significant increase in risk in adult red deer compared to calves (OR: 13.22; 95% CI: 5.96-33.7). The only other significant risk factor associated with wild cervid T. gondii sero-positivity was fencing, with the highest exposure associated with deer from non-fenced hunting areas (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.05-4.99). This study documented a widespread exposure to T. gondii in Danish cervids. Therefore the meat of the wild deer, in particular from roe deer and red deer, should be considered a significant risk of T. gondii infections to humans, if not properly cooked. Further, molecular studies to confirm the presence of infective parasitic stages in the muscles of deer used for consumption is recommended.Entities:
Keywords: Deer; Denmark; Game; Toxoplasma gondii; Wildlife; Zoonoses
Year: 2022 PMID: 35342710 PMCID: PMC8943336 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1The geographical distribution of wild cervids included in the study and the number of animals tested positive for antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in the hunting season 2017–2018 in Denmark (n = 428). Shown by region and proportion of species sampled (roe deer, fallow deer or red deer) in each region. Pie charts indicate proportion of samples from each cervid species. Note Sika deer was only sampled in Mid-Jutland (n = 14), and hence not included in the map. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Overview of Danish wild cervids sampled for Toxoplasma gondii, shot during the hunting season 2017–2018 and associated apparent sero-prevalence and confidence intervals (CI). Results from univariate logistic regression analysis for possible associations between positivity status and individual level risk factors sex and age, performed for each deer species separately, are shown in the last two columns. Information for Sika deer is only shown as total due to the low sample size. Significant associations highlighted in bold.
| Cervid species | Variable | Category | Positive/No. tested | Sero-prevalence (95% CI) | OR* (95% CI**) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/87 | 13.8 (7.34–22.9) | |||||
| Age | Calves | 1/25 | 4.0 (0.1–20.4) | 1.00 | ref | |
| Yearlings | 6/34 | 17.7 (6.8–34.5) | – | 0.142 | ||
| Adults | 5/28 | 17.9 (6.1–36.9) | – | 0.145 | ||
| Sex | Male | 4/27 | 14.8 (4.2–28.2) | 1.00 | ref | |
| Female | 8/60 | 13.3 (5.9–24.6) | – | 0.8530 | ||
| 74/272 | 27.2 (22.0–32.9) | |||||
| Age | Calves | 7/103 | 6.8 (2.8–13.5) | 1.00 | ref | |
| Yearlings | 14/61 | 23.0 (13.2–35.5) | ||||
| Adults | 53/108 | 49.1 (39.3–58.9) | ||||
| Sex | Male | 13/83 | 15.7 (8.1–25.3) | 1.00 | ref | |
| Female | 60/187 | 32.1 (25.5–39.3) | ||||
| 18/55 | 32.7 (20.7–46.7) | |||||
| Age | Calves | 3/14 | 21.4 (4.7–50.8) | 1.00 | ref | |
| Yearlings | 8/28 | 28.6 (13.2–48.7) | – | 0.621 | ||
| Adults | 7/13 | 53.9 (25.1–80.8) | – | 0.089 | ||
| Sex | Male | 3/18 | 16.7 (3.6–41.4) | 1.00 | ref | |
| Female | 15/36 | 41.7 (25.5–59.2) | – | 0.0759 | ||
| 1/14 | 7.1 (0.4–30.5) | – | – | |||
*OR: Odds ratio.
Results from risk factor logistic regression analyses for possible associations between positivity status and individual and location (estate level) risk factors for all deer species, using a two-level hierarchical logistic regression model (with estate ID as random effect). Results from initial exploratory univariate logistic regression analyses, are shown in the first two columns. Results from the final multivariate logistic regression model (after a backward selection procedure) of predictor variables found to be significantly associated with overall Toxoplasma gondii sero-positivity in all sampled deer, are shown in the last two columns. Significant associations highlighted in bold (P < 0.05). σ2; variance of location (estate) level random effect.
| Variables | Univariate regression | Final multivariate regression model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR*(95% CI**) | OR*(95% CI**) | |||
| Age (calves <1 year) | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Species (Fallow deer) | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
| 0.031 | 0.001 | |||
| Sex (Male) | 1.00 | – | ||
| 0.013 | – | – | ||
| Fencing (yes) | 1.00 | – | 1.00 | – |
| 0.032 | 0.037 | |||
| Co-grazing (domestic animals) (no) | 1.00 | |||
| 0.76 (0.33–1.72) | 0.506 | – | – | |
| Supplementary Feeding (yes) | 1.00 | |||
| 1.19 (0.51–2.77) | 0.691 | – | – | |
| Estate size (km2) | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.601 | – | – |
| Nature type (dry) | 1.00 | |||
| 0.78 (0.27–2.21) | 0.641 | – | – | |
| Annual precipitation 2017 (mm) | 1.01 (1.00–1.01) | 0.482 | – | – |
| Annual precipitation 2018 (mm) | 1.01 (1.00–1.01) | 0.340 | – | – |
| Max. annual temperature 2017 (C°) | 1.58 (0.77–3.24) | 0.210 | – | – |
| Max. annual temperature 2018 (C°) | 1.30 (0.74–2.29) | 0.354 | – | – |
| Min. annual temperature 2017 (C°) | 0.84 (0.64–1.10) | 0.214 | – | – |
| Min. annual temperature 2017 (C°) | 0.044 | – | – | |
| 0.93 (0.87–1.00) | 0.067 | – | – | |
| 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.641 | – | – | |
| 1.01 (0.99–1.03) | 0.073 | – | – | |
| 0.96 (0.92–1.02) | 0.156 | – | – | |
| 0.92 (0.84–1.02) | 0.147 | – | – | |
| σ2 (random effect variance) | – | – | 0.05 | 0.01–0.24 |
*OR: Odds ratio; **CI: Confidence interval.