Literature DB >> 35342519

Prevalence of Radiographic Signs of Pincer Deformities in Asymptomatic Indian Individuals: A Retrospective Analysis.

Vishal Raina1, Pravin U Jadhav2, Sudhir Sharan2.   

Abstract

Objective: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is the result of abnormal contact between the proximal femur and the acetabulum rim. Pincer impingement is the result of a globally deep acetabulum, focal anterior overcoverage or less commonly posterior overcoverage. The presence of radiological signs of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is not necessarily associated with symptoms. The study aims to find the prevalence of such signs in asymptomatic adult individuals.
Methods: Data of 714 patients (1428 hips) who have undergone PBH-AP (Pelvis Both hip- Anterior-Posterior view) radiograph for conditions unrelated to the disorders of the hip were taken for study. We evaluated the images for the presence of a cross-over sign (COS) and ischial spine sign (ISS) and measured Lateral Central-Edge (LCE) angle (Wiberg) and Tonnis angle (TA).
Results: Mean age was 33.4 ± 9.8 years. Positive cross-over signs and ischial spine signs were seen in 26.6% and 13.9%, respectively; LCE angle > 40° in 25.5% and Tonnis angle ≤ 0° in 13.5% patients. 36.7% of patients showed atleast one radiological sign of acetabulum overcoverage. There was a significant difference in means of the values of LCE angle and Tonnis angle between males and females (2.9 and - 1.2, respectively). There was no significant difference in prevalence of COS and ISS among the two genders.
Conclusion: This study shows that there is higher prevalence of radiographic signs (36.7%) of pincer deformity among asymptomatic adults. Therefore, new clinical studies are required to clarify the actual significance of these findings. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptomatic; Cross-over sign; Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); Ischial spine sign; Lateral Central-Edge angle; Pincer; Prevalence; Radiograph; Tonnis angle

Year:  2021        PMID: 35342519      PMCID: PMC8921424          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00566-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  19 in total

1.  Standardized AP radiographs do not provide reliable diagnostic measures for the assessment of acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Georgi I Wassilew; Markus O Heller; Gerd Diederichs; Viktor Janz; Markus Wenzl; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Paul E Beaulé; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Femoral head-neck junction deformity is related to osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Hilton José Melo Barros; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Antônio Carlos Bernabé; Marcelo Bordalo Rodrigues; Luiz Eugênio Garcez Leme
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  An examination of the association between different morphotypes of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic subjects and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  G Hartofilakidis; N V Bardakos; G C Babis; G Georgiades
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

5.  Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Alan C L Kang; Andrew J Gooding; Mark H Coates; Tony D Goh; Paul Armour; John Rietveld
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stephan Reichenbach; Peter Jüni; Stefan Werlen; Eveline Nüesch; Christian W Pfirrmann; Sven Trelle; Alex Odermatt; Willy Hofstetter; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Javad Parvizi; Vincent Boutier; Daniel Wyss; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in radiographs of asymptomatic subjects: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Cristiano Valter Diesel; Tiango Aguiar Ribeiro; Rodrigo Benedet Scheidt; Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo; Carlos Roberto Galia
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 9.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Javad Parvizi; Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Hubert Nötzli; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Prevalence of Cam and Pincer Deformities in the X-Rays of Asymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Steffen Thier; Daniel Gerisch; Christel Weiss; Stefan Fickert; Alexander Brunner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.