Literature DB >> 35342518

How Safe is Antegrade Femoral Nailing in Ipsilateral Acetabulum Fractures Requiring Kocher-Langenbeck Approach? An Analysis of 23 Fractures.

Ramesh Perumal1, Durga Prasad Valleri1, Rakesh Kiran Yalavarthi1, Shanmuka Babu Tumati1, Dheenadhayalan Jayaramaraju1, Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan2.   

Abstract

Objective: The ipsilateral acetabulum and femur fracture (IAFF) is an uncommon entity. This combination challenges the surgeon in the optimal management of each injury component, fixation sequence, surgical approaches, implant choices and complications. Inappropriate approach for one fracture may affect the fixation of another or modify the overall outcome. In this perspective, we aim to analyze our results in patients who underwent acetabulum fixation with Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach and antegrade femur nailing (AFN), emphasizing the incidence of infection, skin necrosis and heterotopic ossification (HO).
Methods: During the five years, 22 patients with 23 IAFF (mean age of 36.5 years) were treated operatively. All the patients underwent K-L approach for acetabulum fixation and AFN for femur fracture. All the patients were treated under the supervision of a pelvi-acetabular trauma consultant. Demographic data, injury, surgical, and postoperative details were collected. The quality of acetabular reduction was evaluated using Matta's criteria. The radiological outcome, obtained at final follow-up, was graded according to Matta's criteria. Functional outcome was evaluated by Merle d'Aubigné and Postel system. HO was graded according to the Brooker system. Complications recorded were DVT, skin necrosis, infection, arthritis, HO, AVN and need for additional surgery.
Results: Out of 23, 11 had posterior dislocation, 6 had quadrilateral plate injury with central protrusion and six without dislocation. Femur fractures include 9-midshaft, 4-proximal third, 3-distal third, 3-trochanteric fractures and 4-segmental fractures. There were 11 elementary and 12 associated acetabulum fractures. 21 fractures underwent staged-fixation. Single-stage fixation was done in 2. In all cases treated with staged-fixation, AFN was done first. The mean duration of follow-up was 28 months (16-57). All femur fractures united with a mean union time of 21.3 weeks (11-37). The radiological outcome was excellent in 13, good in 4, fair in 3 and poor in 3. The functional outcome was excellent in 3, good in 11, fair in 4 and poor in 4 patients. None had skin necrosis. Three patients had infection. 14 (60.8%) hips had HO, with clinically significant HO (grade 4) in 2(8.6%). Six (26%) patients had arthritic changes. Four (17.3%) hips had avascular necrosis.
Conclusion: AFN is a viable option in IAFFs requiring a K-L approach under the supervision of a pelvi-acetabular surgeon. This combined approach per se does not demonstrate an increased risk of infection, wound healing problems or HO. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00544-w. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum; Femur; Heterotopic ossification; Infection; Ipsilateral; Kocher–Langenbeck; Nailing

Year:  2021        PMID: 35342518      PMCID: PMC8921365          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00544-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  20 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  N Briffa; R Pearce; A M Hill; M Bircher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

2.  Ipsilateral fractures of the pelvis and the femur--floating hip? A retrospective analysis of 42 cases.

Authors:  E J Müller; K Siebenrock; A Ekkernkamp; R Ganz; G Muhr
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018

Authors:  Eric G Meinberg; Julie Agel; Craig S Roberts; Matthew D Karam; James F Kellam
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses.

Authors:  R B Gustilo; J T Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Treatment and Complications of Patients With Ipsilateral Acetabular and Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Lisa K Cannada; Justin M Hire; Preston J Boyer; Heidi Israel; Hassan Mir; Jason Halvorson; Gregory J Della Rocca; Bryan Ming; Brian Mullis; Chetan Deshpande
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Unusual combination of femoral head dislocation associated acetabular fracture with ipsilateral neck and shaft fractures: A case report.

Authors:  Fuat Duygulu; Mustafa Calis; Mahmut Argun; Ahmet Guney
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-12

8.  The floating hip. Ipsilateral pelvic and femoral fractures.

Authors:  M Liebergall; J Lowe; G P Whitelaw; M J Wetzler; D Segal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-01

9.  The floating hip: complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy A Burd; Michael S Hughes; Jeffrey O Anglen
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-02

10.  The floating hip injury: patterns of injury.

Authors:  M Liebergall; R Mosheiff; O Safran; A Peyser; D Segal
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.