Literature DB >> 35342515

Past, Present and Future of Arthroscopic Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Research Frontiers in Arthroscopy.

Ashwin Gobbur1, Vijay Kumar Konkathi2, Gangireddi Suresh Babu3, Girinivasan Chellamuthu4, Sathish Muthu4,5, Madhan Jeyaraman4,6.   

Abstract

Purpose: Active research in arthroscopy in all its domains has been transcending into evidence-backed clinical practice over years. A look-back at the research developments in arthroscopy using scientometry for the past thirty years will help the researchers identify what has been investigated so far, and what needs to be done in the future.
Methods: We used the Web of Science-core collection database as the source for data retrieval. We used CiteSpace (5.7.R1) for scientometric and visualization analysis Visualization of the structure, regularity, and distribution of research domains in the arthroscopy was done with the analysis of the article co-citation data to mine the knowledge clustering and citation space distribution. We also analyzed the co-occurrence between the additional research units such as cooperation among authors, institutions, and countries in the field of arthroscopy.
Results: We recovered 383 RCTs and 11,853 non-RCT articles in the field of arthroscopy from the global literature of 15,766 arthroscopy-related publications from 1990 to 2019. Research co-operation group with the top contribution to the arthroscopic literature was from BG Domb, MJ Philippon, and SJ Nho for non-RCT articles and Casati A, Pluta A, and Lund B for RCTs. Weaker collaboration exists among the institutions globally, but the network of domestic institutions seemed stronger in co-institution analysis. USA and England have been the pioneers in research particularly the RCTs. The current hotspots were around the outcome analysis, particularly in the knee and shoulder pathologies. In the hip the main area of focus was the Femoro-Acetabular Impingement (FAI). The other areas of arthroscopy remain relatively less explored. Conclusions: Research in arthroscopy is rapidly progressing. Poor international collaboration, the concentration of research only in certain areas of arthroscopy, and conduction of most RCTs only by certain institutes seem to be gross problems in arthroscopic research. Setting up of an International authoritative body for arthroscopic research is the way forward for arthroscopy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00586-0. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; CiteSpace; Randomised Controlled Trials; Research frontiers; Research trend; Scientometry

Year:  2022        PMID: 35342515      PMCID: PMC8921402          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00586-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  6 in total

Review 1.  Randomized controlled trials: part 17 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Maria Kabisch; Christian Ruckes; Monika Seibert-Grafe; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Eleni I Pitsouni; George A Malietzis; Georgios Pappas
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America's scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal & Country Rank.

Authors:  Grisel Zacca-González; Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez; Benjamín Vargas-Quesada; Félix de Moya-Anegón
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The Current Research Landscape of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Managing Cerebrovascular and Heart Diseases: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Giang Thu Vu; Huong Lan Thi Nguyen; Son Nghiem; Ming-Xuan Tan; Zhi-Kai Lim; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Trends of arthroscopy publications in PubMed and Scopus.

Authors:  Srinivas B S Kambhampati; Abhishek Vaish; Raju Vaishya; Mohit Kumar Patralekh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-29
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Scientometric analysis of Indian Orthopaedic Research in the last two decades.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Brij Mohan Gupta; Mallikarjun Kappi; Abhishek Vaish
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Evolution of evidence in spinal surgery - past, present and future Scientometric analysis of randomized controlled trials in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Sathish Muthu; Madhan Jeyaraman; Naveen Jeyaraman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.