Keming Gao1, Marzieh Ayati1, Mehmet Koyuturk1, Joseph R Calabrese1, Stephen J Ganocy1, Nicholas M Kaye1, Hillard M Lazarus1, Eric Christian1, David Kaplan1. 1. Gao, MD, PhD, Calabrese, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Ayati, PhD, Department of Computer Science, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX. Koyuturk, PhD, Department of Computer and Data Sciences, Center for Proteomics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. Ganocy, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. Lazarus, MD, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; CellPrint Biotechnology, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. Kaye PhD, Christian, PhD, Kaplan, MD, PhD, CellPrint Biotechnology, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if enhanced flow cytometry (CellPrint™) can identify intracellular proteins of lithium responsiveness in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes from patients with bipolar disorder. Methods: Eligible bipolar I or II patients were openly treated with lithium for 16-weeks. Baseline levels of Bcl2, BDNF, calmodulin, Fyn, phospho-Fyn/phospho-Yes, GSK3β, phospho-GSK3αβ, HMGB1, iNOS, IRS2, mTor, NLPR3, PGM1, PKA C-α, PPAR-γ, phospho-RelA, and TPH1 in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes of lithium responders and non-responders were measured with CellPrint™. Their utility of discriminating responders from non-responders was explored. Protein-protein network and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted. Results: Of the 24 intent-to-treat patients, 12 patients completed the 16-week study. Eleven of 13 responders and 8 of 11 non-responders were available for this analysis. The levels of the majority of analytes in lithium responders were lower than non-responders in both cell types, but only the level of GSK3β in monocytes was significantly different (p = 0.034). The combination of GSK3β and phospho-GSK3αβ levels in monocytes correctly classified 11/11 responders and 5/8 non-responders. Combination of GSK3β, phospho-RelA, TPH1 and PGM1 correctly classified 10/11 responders and 6/7 non-responders, both with a likelihood of ≥ 85%. Prolactin, leptin, BDNF, neurotrophin, and epidermal growth factor/epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways are involved in the lithium treatment response. GSK3β and RelA genes are involved in 4 of 5 these pathways. Conclusion: CellPrint™ flow cytometry was able to detect differences in multiple proteins in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes between lithium responders and non-responders. A large study is warranted to confirm or refute these findings.
Purpose: To determine if enhanced flow cytometry (CellPrint™) can identify intracellular proteins of lithium responsiveness in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes from patients with bipolar disorder. Methods: Eligible bipolar I or II patients were openly treated with lithium for 16-weeks. Baseline levels of Bcl2, BDNF, calmodulin, Fyn, phospho-Fyn/phospho-Yes, GSK3β, phospho-GSK3αβ, HMGB1, iNOS, IRS2, mTor, NLPR3, PGM1, PKA C-α, PPAR-γ, phospho-RelA, and TPH1 in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes of lithium responders and non-responders were measured with CellPrint™. Their utility of discriminating responders from non-responders was explored. Protein-protein network and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted. Results: Of the 24 intent-to-treat patients, 12 patients completed the 16-week study. Eleven of 13 responders and 8 of 11 non-responders were available for this analysis. The levels of the majority of analytes in lithium responders were lower than non-responders in both cell types, but only the level of GSK3β in monocytes was significantly different (p = 0.034). The combination of GSK3β and phospho-GSK3αβ levels in monocytes correctly classified 11/11 responders and 5/8 non-responders. Combination of GSK3β, phospho-RelA, TPH1 and PGM1 correctly classified 10/11 responders and 6/7 non-responders, both with a likelihood of ≥ 85%. Prolactin, leptin, BDNF, neurotrophin, and epidermal growth factor/epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways are involved in the lithium treatment response. GSK3β and RelA genes are involved in 4 of 5 these pathways. Conclusion: CellPrint™ flow cytometry was able to detect differences in multiple proteins in monocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes between lithium responders and non-responders. A large study is warranted to confirm or refute these findings.
Authors: Rose Oughtred; Chris Stark; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Jennifer Rust; Lorrie Boucher; Christie Chang; Nadine Kolas; Lara O'Donnell; Genie Leung; Rochelle McAdam; Frederick Zhang; Sonam Dolma; Andrew Willems; Jasmin Coulombe-Huntington; Andrew Chatr-Aryamontri; Kara Dolinski; Mike Tyers Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Yian Lin; Adam X Maihofer; Emma Stapp; Megan Ritchey; Ney Alliey-Rodriguez; Amit Anand; Yokesh Balaraman; Wade H Berrettini; Holli Bertram; Abesh Bhattacharjee; Cynthia V Calkin; Carla Conroy; William Coryell; Nicole D'Arcangelo; Anna DeModena; Joanna M Biernacka; Carrie Fisher; Nicole Frazier; Mark Frye; Keming Gao; Julie Garnham; Elliot Gershon; Kara Glazer; Fernando S Goes; Toyomi Goto; Elizabeth Karberg; Gloria Harrington; Petter Jakobsen; Masoud Kamali; Marisa Kelly; Susan G Leckband; Falk W Lohoff; Andrea Stautland; Michael J McCarthy; Melvin G McInnis; Francis Mondimore; Gunnar Morken; John I Nurnberger; Ketil J Oedegaard; Vigdis Elin Giever Syrstad; Kelly Ryan; Martha Schinagle; Helle Schoeyen; Ole A Andreassen; Marth Shaw; Paul D Shilling; Claire Slaney; Bruce Tarwater; Joseph R Calabrese; Martin Alda; Caroline M Nievergelt; Peter P Zandi; John R Kelsoe Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Damian Szklarczyk; Alberto Santos; Christian von Mering; Lars Juhl Jensen; Peer Bork; Michael Kuhn Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 16.971