| Literature DB >> 35341205 |
Vinit Kumar Gunjan1, Y Vijayalata2, Susmitha Valli2, Sumit Kumar3, M O Mohamed4, V Saravanan5.
Abstract
To improve the quality of knowledge service selection in a cloud manufacturing environment, this paper proposes a cloud manufacturing knowledge service optimization decision method based on users' psychological behavior. Based on the characteristic analysis of cloud manufacturing knowledge service, establish the optimal evaluation index system of cloud manufacturing knowledge service, use the rough set theory to assign initial weights to each evaluation index, and adjust the initial weights according to the user's multiattribute preference to ensure that the consequences are allocated correctly. The system can help counselors acquire psychological knowledge in time and identify counselors with suicidal tendencies to prevent danger. This paper collected some psychological information data and built a knowledge graph by creating a dictionary and generating entities and relationships. The Han language processing word segmentation tool generates keywords, and CHI (Chi-square) feature selection is used to classify the problem. This feature selection is a statistical premise test that is acceptable when the chi-square test results are distributed with the null hypothesis. It includes the Pearson chi-square test and its variations. The Chi-square test has several benefits, including its distributed processing resilience, ease of computation, broad information gained from the test, usage in research when statistical assumptions are not satisfied, and adaptability in organizing information from multiple or many more group investigations. For improving question and answer efficiency, compared with other models, the BiLSTM (bidirectional long short-term memory) model is preferred to build suicidal tendencies. The Han language processing is a method that is used for word segmentation, and the advantage of this method is that it plays a key role in the word segmentation tool and generates keywords, and CHI (Chi-square) feature selection is used to classify the problem. Text classifier detects dangerous user utterances, question template matching, and answer generation by computing similarity scores. Finally, the system accuracy test is carried out, proving that the system can effectively answer the questions related to psychological counseling. The extensive experiments reveal that the method in this paper's accuracy rate, recall rate, and F1 value is much superior to other standard models in detecting psychological issues.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35341205 PMCID: PMC8947904 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3604113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1The representative framework for psychological question answering system.
Examples of marked suicidal tendencies and normal questions.
| Cat-id | Cat | Question |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tendency to self-harm | How to relieve the unreal feeling of depersonalization? In junior high school, my mood fluctuated a lot, and I cut myself with a knife because of some things and even suffered from severe depression |
| 2 | Normal | Ever since I reconciled with my boyfriend, he has always been hot and cold, and he does not want to admit that we are together. What does he mean? |
| 3 | Tendency to harm | Am I mentally ill? Ever since I was a child, I have had the idea of killing people and killing people around me. |
| 0 | Suicidal tendencies | I want to jump off a building, but I am afraid of heights |
Figure 2represents the accuracy of tendency classification model.
Figure 3The F1-Score of tendency classification model.
Evaluation results of three-word segmentation tools.
| Word segmentation tool | Accuracy | Recall | F1 value | Word segmentation time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jieba | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 12.480 |
| HanLP | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 04.478 |
| Academy of Sciences word segmentation NLPIR | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 30.0598 |
Classification performance of model.
| Model | Accuracy | F1-score | Precision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Naïve Bayes | 79.65 | 80.56 | 69.56 |
| Decision tree | 74.52 | 81.26 | 65.25 |
| SVM | 75.62 | 76.85 | 70.62 |
| XGBoost | 80.54 | 82.54 | 72.56 |
| BiLSTM | 85.63 | 89.85 | 75.65 |
Figure 4Representation of the precision of the tendency classification model.
Figure 5The accuracy of suicidal tendency classification by BiLSTM model.
Figure 6The F1-Score of suicidal tendency classification by BiLSTM model.
Figure 7Representation of the F1-Score of suicidal tendency classification by BiLSTM model.
Suicidal Tendency classification by BiLSTM Model.
| Question | Accuracy | F1-score | Precision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suicidal tendencies | 81.26 | 79.56 | 75.62 |
| Tendency to self-harm | 82.62 | 80.54 | 85.61 |
| Tendency to Hurt | 85.68 | 84.56 | 90.25 |
| Normal | 95.62 | 97.56 | 98.56 |