Literature DB >> 353405

[Comparative study on single layer and two layer anastomoses of small intestine (author's transl)].

G Müller, G Kieninger, G Breucha, I Bustamante, W Neugebauer.   

Abstract

The one layer anastomosis after Gambee is compared with the two layer anastomosis after Dick at the small bowel of 20 minipigs. The end-to-end anastomosis after Gambee consists of an interrupted, inverting suturing of the bowel wall. Dick suggested a closed method, applying bronchial clamps before resecting the bowel. Seromuscular sutures and inner all layer sutures are inserted interrupted. Experimental studies have been done after 4, 7, 14 and 21 days. In Histology two layer anastomoses caused delayed wound healing after 4 days. Twenty-one days after the operation histological findings in both groups were equal. Microangiographic studies showed, that in single layer anastomoses revascularization began 3 days earlier than in two layer anastomoses. Measuring of the bursting strength showed no significant differences. All parameters suggest equal value of both techniques. In our opinion the two layer anastomosis after Dick combines the advantages of a closed method with a simple, easy performable technique. We therfore apply it all over the gastrointestinal tract with exception of esophagel and rectal anastomoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 353405     DOI: 10.1007/bf01261768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  10 in total

1.  Studies on the healing of anastomoses of small and large intestines.

Authors:  L Wise; W McAlister; T Stein; P Schuck
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-08

2.  HEALING OF COLONIC ANASTOMOSES IN THE RAT.

Authors:  J B HERRMANN; S C WOODWARD; E J PULASKI
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1964-08

3.  Ten years' experience with a single layer anastomosis in colon surgery.

Authors:  L P GAMBEE; W GARNJOBST; C E HARDWICK
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Suture strength and healing strength of end-to-end intestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  N M FELLOWS; J BURGE; C S HATCH; P B PRICE
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1951

5.  [Clinical and animal-experiment studies on technique of anastomosis in adominal surgery (author's transl)].

Authors:  S Langer; H Pesendorfer; H Breining; M Cen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1974

6.  [Microangiographic studies on rat intestine in the testing of various types of anastomosis].

Authors:  B Herzog
Journal:  Helv Chir Acta       Date:  1971-04

7.  [Experiences and complications in double- and single-layer enteroanastomoses].

Authors:  K Reichel; R Nagel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1969

8.  A comparative study of small-bowel anastomoses by angiography and microangiography.

Authors:  H B Abramowitz; W H McAlister
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength.

Authors:  T S Nelsen; C J Anders
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1966-08

10.  Comparative study of intestinal anastomotic healing in inverted and everted closures.

Authors:  L C Getzen; R D Roe; C K Holloway
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1966-12
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Revascularization of colonic anastomoses].

Authors:  K Schäfer; M Göller; P Stanka; R Ernst; V Zumtobel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

2.  Impact of intraoperative temperature and humidity on healing of intestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Johannes Boldt; Sylvia Timme; Birte Kulemann; Gabriel Seifert; Philipp Anton Holzner; Sophia Chikhladze; Jodok Matthias Grüneberger; Simon Küsters; Olivia Sick; Jens Höppner; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Goran Marjanovic
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.