Literature DB >> 35340287

A Behavioural Assay to Investigate Judgment Bias in Zebrafish.

Felipe Espigares1, Raquel R Martins1, Rui F Oliveira1,2,3.   

Abstract

In this protocol, we describe for the first time a judgment bias paradigm to phenotype the way zebrafish assess ambiguous stimuli. We have developed and validated a protocol for a judgment bias test based on a Go/No-go task, and performed using a half radial maze. After a habituation phase, fish are trained to discriminate between two reference arms [positive (P) and negative (N)]. For this purpose, they experience a positive event (food reward in P), when presented with a specific location/color cue, and a negative event (chasing with net in N), when presented with a different location/color cue. Acquisition of the discrimination learning between P and N is revealed by the latencies to enter the experimental arms of the behavioral maze being significantly lower for the P arm than for the N arm. Once zebrafish are able to discriminate between P and N arms, their latency to enter other maze arms spatially located between P and N [(Near Positive (NP), Ambiguous (A) = half-way between P and N, and Near Negative (NN)] is analyzed. Latencies (L) to enter NP, A and NN maze arms are interpreted as indicating the individual expectancy to experience a reward/punishment on each of them. A judgment bias score (JBS) is calculated from the latencies to enter the P, N, and A arms for each fish [JBS = (LA-LP)*100/(LN-LP)], based on which fish can be classified into an optimistic/pessimistic axis. A JBS below 50 indicates that fish perceive the ambiguous stimulus as a positive one (optimistic bias), while JBS above 50 indicates that fish perceive the ambiguous stimulus as a negative one (pessimistic bias). However, for classification criteria, it could be advantageous to use the method of selecting extreme phenotypes (e.g., upper and lower quartiles of the JBS), since JBS in zebrafish falls into a bimodal distribution (unpublished data). Therefore, this protocol provides a unique, inexpensive, and effective alternative to other methods of measuring affective states in zebrafish that might be of great interest to a broad target audience and have a large number of applications. Graphic abstract: Flow chart of the judgment bias protocol in zebrafish.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective state; Judgment bias; Optimism; Pessimism; Welfare; Zebrafish

Year:  2022        PMID: 35340287      PMCID: PMC8899554          DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bio Protoc        ISSN: 2331-8325


  14 in total

1.  Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state.

Authors:  Emma J Harding; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Dogs showing separation-related behaviour exhibit a 'pessimistic' cognitive bias.

Authors:  Michael Mendl; Julie Brooks; Christine Basse; Oliver Burman; Elizabeth Paul; Emily Blackwell; Rachel Casey
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Unexpected rewards induce dopamine-dependent positive emotion-like state changes in bumblebees.

Authors:  Cwyn Solvi; Luigi Baciadonna; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Zebrafish models for translational neuroscience research: from tank to bedside.

Authors:  Adam Michael Stewart; Oliver Braubach; Jan Spitsbergen; Robert Gerlai; Allan V Kalueff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  A test to identify judgement bias in mice.

Authors:  Hetty Boleij; José van't Klooster; Marla Lavrijsen; Susanne Kirchhoff; Saskia S Arndt; Frauke Ohl
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Suzanne Desire; Sarah E Gartside; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Telomeres in aging and disease: lessons from zebrafish.

Authors:  Madalena C Carneiro; Inês Pimenta de Castro; Miguel Godinho Ferreira
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 8.  Zebrafish cancer: the state of the art and the path forward.

Authors:  Richard White; Kristin Rose; Leonard Zon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Short telomeres drive pessimistic judgement bias in zebrafish.

Authors:  F Espigares; D Abad-Tortosa; S A M Varela; M G Ferreira; R F Oliveira
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Pain and pessimism: dairy calves exhibit negative judgement bias following hot-iron disbudding.

Authors:  Heather W Neave; Rolnei R Daros; João H C Costa; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.