| Literature DB >> 35340216 |
Chenchen Yu1, Ying Liu1, Zhang Xuemei2, Aijin Ma3, Tan Jianxin1, Tian Yiling1.
Abstract
It was the focus of attention that probiotic control drink was packed with prebiotic nutrients and lactic acid bacteria. So, this study is aimed at revealing that the fermented carrot pulp regulation and protection function to the intestinal microecological disorders usually induced by antibiotic treatment. First, we study on lactobacillus fermentation conditions and effects on the secondary metabolism of fermented carrot juice, get its phenolic acids up, and get its flavonoids down. Then, establishment of the dysbacteriosis mouse model was used to validate the fermented carrot pulp prevention and treatment of intestinal microbiota imbalance. After the antibiotic treatment, the mice showed impotence, laziness, slow movement, weight loss, thin feces, dull hair, and anal redness, while the mice in the control group were all normal in terms of the mental state, diet, weight, and bowl movement. Along with the treatment, the abnormal conditions of the mice in the model group and natural recovery group improved in different degrees, indicating that the fermentation treatment is of help to the intestinal microbiota recovery. The fermentation-treated group of mice recovered close to normal that the diarrhea disappeared, and the weight gain, mental state, and the feces became normal. The serum antioxidant (SOD, GSH, and MDA) levels of the mice were checked. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels and glutathione (GSH) levels in the ordinary fermentation-treated group and probiotic fermentation-treated group were significantly increased compare to the natural recovery group. The malondialdehyde (MDA) levels showed great differences between the fermentation-treated groups and the blank group. At last, the 16sRNA analysis revealed that the microbiota richness and diversity in probiotic fermentation (J) are much higher than those in the model group (H), ordinary fermentation group (I), and blank group (G). Groups J and I are of significantly higher antioxidant level than group H; however, only the glutathione (GSH) level in group J increased dramatically but not those in the other three groups. Antibiotic treatment-induced mouse intestinal microecological disorder reduce the microbiota richness and diversity. Prebiotics fermented carrot pulp treatment can help in the recovery from the microbiota richness and diversity level prior to the antibiotic treatment, which suggests it can regulate and protect the murine intestinal microbiome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35340216 PMCID: PMC8942650 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2479956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1(a) Validation of the dysbacteriosis mouse model. (b) Mouse anatomy analysis. The cecal wall of the MX1 is thinned, 2-4 times swelled compare to the KB1, and the contents were watery.
Effect on polyphenol and flavonoids in fermented carrot.
| Component | Carrot puree | Fermented juice | Variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total polyphenol (mg/100 g) | 29.54 ± 0.0033 | 67.55 ± 0.0007 | +38.01 |
| Total flavonoids (mg/mL) | 0.19 ± 0.0609 | 0.06 ± 0.0005 | -0.13 |
The weight change of mice in different experimental groups (, g).
| Group | 3 d (before molding) | 1 w | 2 w | 3 w | 4 w |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 20.16 ± 0.42 | 31.25 ± 3.44 | 38.80 ± 2.37 | 44.21 ± 1.61 | 48.18 ± 1.20 |
| Model | 20.14 ± 0.38 | 28.33 ± 2.19b | 34.84 ± 1.87b | 40.76 ± 1.14b | 45.20 ± 1.71 |
| Fermentation | — | 27.19 ± 2.39b | 34.59 ± 1.46b | 42.79 ± 1.43 | 45.41 ± 1.77 |
| Probiotic fermentation | — | 28.58 ± 2.00b | 35.64 ± 1.51b | 42.90 ± 1.61 | 45.80 ± 0.97 |
a P < 0.01; bP < 0.05.
General condition changes in mice.
| Group | Weight increased | Mental state | Hair | Feces | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before molding | All | Normal | Normal | Smooth-coated | Dry, brown-black |
| Molding | Blank | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Model | Slow | Dispirited | Lusterless, yellowing | Diarrhea | |
| Treatment | Blank | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Model | Slow | In-normal | Luster, yellowing | Diarrhea relief | |
| Fermentation | Normal | Normal | Luster | Diarrhea abated | |
| Probiotic fermentation | Normal | Normal | Luster | Diarrhea abated |
The effect of fermentation liquor on antioxidant levels in serum of mice ().
| Group | SOD (U/mg) | GSH ( | MDA (nmol/mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 172.39 ± 23.16b | 30.85 ± 7.53d | 18.38 ± 11.04d |
| Model | 132.19 ± 12.90 | 16.84 ± 6.83 | 31.04 ± 19.06 |
| Fermentation | 161.76 ± 10.11c | 23.99 ± 5.68d | 11.82 ± 6.06d |
| Probiotic fermentation | 154.80 ± 12.40c | 16.47 ± 3.39af | 10.13 ± 1.68d |
Compared with the blank group, aP < 0.01 and bP < 0.05. Compared with the model group, cP < 0.01 and dP < 0.05. In comparison between experimental groups, eP < 0.01 and fP < 0.05.
Effects of fermented liquid tablets on serum lipid levels in sera of mice ().
| Group | TC ( | TG (mmol/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Blank | 4.30 ± 0.79 | 2.32 ± 0.56 |
| Model | 4.18 ± 0.77 | 2.35 ± 0.48 |
| Fermentation | 3.54 ± 0.71 | 2.02 ± 0.78 |
| Probiotic fermentation | 4.59 ± 0.88 | 2.13 ± 0.42 |
Compared with the blank group, aP < 0.01 and bP < 0.05.
The result of OTU.
| Sample | Blank | Model | Fermentation | Probiotic fermentation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | 156 | 157 | 170 | 167 |
Figure 2(a) Venn diagram of the strain types from OUT analysis (G and H: model group, I: fermentation group, J: probiotic fermentation group). (b) Heatmap diagram of the top 30 strains abundance in OUT result. OTU44 is Bacillus, OTU11 is Pseudomonas, OTU22 is Alcaligenes, OTU10 is Bacteroides and Klebsiella, OTU12 is a fecal sterol-producing bacterium, OTU9 is Lactobacillus, OTU15 is Lactobacillus genus, OTU26 is Helicobacter, OTU18 is Rosporia, OTU6 is polymorphic rod, OTU14 is Helicobacter Bacillus, and OTU45, 30, 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 74, 17, 21, 16, 102, 37, 24, and 19 are Bacteroides.
The result of alpha analysis.
| Group | Sample | ACE | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | Good's Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | KB2 | 147.362 | 162.2 | 4.342 | 0.864 | 1 |
| Model | MX2 | 162.396 | 167 | 4.981 | 0.819 | 1 |
| Fermentation | EI1 | 157.549 | 158.875 | 4.086 | 0.843 | 1 |
| — | EII1 | 157.876 | 156.6 | 4.357 | 0.895 | 1 |
| Probiotic fermentation | EI2 | 146.382 | 144.125 | 4.742 | 0.94 | 1 |
| — | EII2 | 139.563 | 139 | 4.567 | 0.927 | 1 |
Figure 3Heatmap diagram of beta diversity.
Figure 4Principle Component Analysis (PCA).
Figure 5Phylum analysis.
Figure 6Genus analysis.